Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: vickers k14 Mar 2022, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2022, 14:33 PMKatukov if you take 1 vickers and 1 bren, you are intentionally losing the game for yourself and you should leave the game, unless you lost by the time you realized your complete blunder Answer a simply question, if you are facing Assault grenadier charging with sprint would rather have 2 Bren on your IS or 1 Vicers K and 1 Bren? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers k14 Mar 2022, 14:32 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2022, 14:16 PMminhuh064 The only thing Vicker K good at is scaring enemies with their loud noice. Usually it takes year to see the dmg ramp up even when close range. I take Bar over VK anyday And that is by definition "perception bias" since the two weapon are practically identical. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers k14 Mar 2022, 14:11 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2022, 14:06 PMteckins But when grenadier have their G43 they became assault long range/short range infantry that worked similar to fallschirm but when tommies have vickers k they became crippling assault infantry with penalty out of cover its not the same I dont deny the fact that vickers k works on officer and RE but piat suited RE better. The vickers k is doctrinal and should be specialized, yes, but this treatment doesn't mean anything G43 grenadier are not assault long range/short range infantry and have very little to do with fallschirm. There is plenty of cover especially in late game battlefield. In the end they of day if you do not like vicker K on infatry section do not use them M5 call is still a useful ability. If you have another design suggestion for Vickers K that in your opinion it is better feel free to share it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers k14 Mar 2022, 14:09 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2022, 14:04 PMaerafield "meh" at all ranges you mean. With this weapon combo you would probably equally lose against A-move grenadiers, G43 fusiliers and get totally stomped by Elite squads If you mean losing at long range from long infatry yes If you mean losing by more expensive squad yes If you mean by losing by AI special elite infatry yes but that would mean simply using them in unfavorable situation and imagine how broken it would be if they could win those. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers k14 Mar 2022, 13:27 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2022, 12:59 PMteckins I dont desires such kind of squad i do aware how balance works. Its just that "BAR copy" is so weird on a defensive long range squad with penalty out of cover, BAR works on riflemen because they are...riflemen. and using a doc that offers ability to skip teching racks but teching racks anyway is not so stonks If one equips infatry section with "BARs" they are no longer a "long range defensive infatry" and should not be used as one. This is similar G43 grenadier upgrade with which they are no longer a "long range defensive infatry". And UKF have other infantries like the Officer and the R.En. that can also use the Vickers K The original issue was that Vcicker's K and Bren's overlapped and did not offered anything different. Making the weapon work differently was an improvement over the original design (although bren should be the "assault rifle" weapon and Vicker the LMG, since the Vickers K ). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers k14 Mar 2022, 12:54 PM Vickers K is not a long range weapon it actually a BAR. If one wants long range weapons one should use a Brens if one want a mid range weapons that can fire on the move one should use a Vickers. If one want a squad that can perform good at all ranges one can use +1 +1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: At the end the modding team didn’t balance the game.13 Mar 2022, 09:25 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2022, 07:47 AMEsxile Which days? thats a 7 years old game patched constantly every 6 months? Imo balance was better couple of years ago. When you could see variety of factions during tournaments. The flipping coin to me was when the modding overbuffed JLI and we had to suffer it for 6 months. Then from that point balance just went bad to worst. That is another gross exaggeration JIL where fixed within a couple of months. In: Lobby
Thread: Two questions9 Mar 2022, 20:47 PM You are welcomed. It always help to play all factions since one can better understand strengths and weakness. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Two questions9 Mar 2022, 19:57 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2022, 19:49 PMTrubbbel Allies can plant a mine that completely immobilises a tank resulting in almost certain death. Which mine is that? M6 Anti-Tank Mine that can be planted by the USF M20 Utility Car Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2022, 19:49 PMTrubbbel Allies used Katyushas and arty call-ins to bomb my base but I cannot do the same to them. What's going on with that? On map artillery like Katyusha can target base sector. Off map artillery can not target base sector although some off map abilities with large AOE can be target outside base sector and still deliver payloads inside the base sector. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: At the end the modding team didn’t balance the game.9 Mar 2022, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2022, 17:54 PMEsxile Then you misunderstood what I said. The modding team has Arranged team matches in mind while balancing the game, not trying to balance arranged team vs random. AT vs random is a necessary evil that can't be balanced. Sturmpanther can say they primarily balanced the game for 1vs1, true is countless of changes they made had nothing to do with 1vs1. So what you are saying is that because the game was balanced for 4vs4 it mess up 1v1? What does arranged team have to do with anything? In: Lobby