So in a real game, T3 comes about 10 fuel and 50 MP earlier at best and 5 fuel and 25 MP earlier at worst (depending on when you purchase AT nades), whereas you pay 25 MP less and 5 fuel more for T4. This is a minimal buff to teching.
That are not the only change, look 1220 for the changes.
Changes include faster T1, lower cost and better healing, faster T3 with, better Mobilize reserves that is available 40 fuel earlier from t3...
But what is the argument? Teching for just teching is complete bullshit. There is no point in teching for its own sake.
T3 units come earlier, which is likely a necessary buff for the SU76 and the M5 which at least might have the chance to make them more attractive), while the T70 got a rightful nerf to justify it coming a bit earlier. The only issue that can still arise is if the T70 were STILL too strong, which to be honest I cannot judge.
Otherwise you are arguing for keeping the SU76 and M5 as units that are not even niche, but absolutely useless.
The only point I have made is that Soviet tect does not need to become cheaper as some users have suggested. Check post 1183
After I See Soviet PTRS Have buff Lower Ready Aim Time Form 1.25 To 0.5 Second
Boys AT Rifle should have benefit too ?
in live Boys AT Rifle have 2 second Ready aim time longer than live ptrs 0.75 second if New patch update Ready aim time have longer 1.5 second compare PTRS From now
Main difference is Boy are AI weapons also while Penal PTRS is less effective. That would increase Boys AI also.
Imo it at rifles should start firing faster so that they work better vs light vehicles but there AI should be looked at. It would far better if the AI for these weapons was move to a timed ability like hit the dirt.
Passenger firing from inside moving vehicles get accuracy penalty.
Since there are weapons that are less affected by accuracy how about splinting the DPS drop to accuracy CD and reload making the DPS drop more even across all weapons.
No reason to make the commander less viable in 1v1 just to make it less useful in 4v4 unless its too strong which I don't think it is.
No. He was complaining about having to get the PRIEST commander to counter the Lefh. If the only thing he needed was an off map artillery strike he could have taken armor for the 240mm strike or mechanized for the 155mm or just have an ally with IL2 bombs etc.
At the beginning of his post he says "arty is essential", and given the units he's brought up I don't think he means off maps.
I suggest you actually read what BlueKnight has actually posted before you start disagreeing with me.
Ah, I see now. In the original post I wrote that as USF you have to play Priest commander (to have time on target to be able to destroy enemy leFH). Other USF offmaps can't reliably kill a leFH.
...
The medics will certainly be nice, especially how they won't get caught up on a single model and not heal anything at all unless you micro your units at base, no argument there. But you still have to retreat to have heals, which desires a slight increase in effectiveness. The only change medics in my memory have ever received was they lost a medic, and that was back when the game was slower.
Moli/at nade isn't a reduction in cost if you never it the molitov, which Noone did because they are garbage. At any rate I would GLADLY trade the combination in favor of knocking some manpower off t1/t2 if the other is built so that penals can be less oppressive as they would have support.
Earlier t3 is technically a buff but worse T70 is a significant nerf. You sre arguing paper costs I'm arguing impact.
If soviet teching is already being reduced then it's in scope and there is no reason not to be discussing alternatives that might have better synergy with the faction.
And my point remain Soviet do not need further tech discounts.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
Heartless Jäger 
