Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback6 Jan 2021, 07:57 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 06:52 AMvgfgff with panther acc buff it should counter su-85 more easier than before cause it won't make a missing shot. I think multiple TD are easier to counter than multiple panther in team mode. example 4x panther vs 5x su-85 if panther run though them I think only 1 panther will lose .since su-85 have no turret they have no chance when panther can closed. That is simply incorrect: A Panther firing on SU-85 at range 50 has 72% chance to score direct hit if stationary. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Run and Gun6 Jan 2021, 07:51 AM The need for this has already been recognized and implemented and certain vehicle has a bigger penalty for passenger. Imo it would better if all vehicle had the same multiplier but the multiplier included other more variables to reduce the squad wipe capability of certain weapons while keeping the DPS of other weapon to similar levels. In: Lobby
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 22:19 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 22:18 PMHannibal You are deflecting. I responded to all these claims already in post 1235, you are free to respond. Is medic cheaper? yes or no "Medics Given the high manpower cost of the Soviet tech structure, which does not grant new abilities or units like the other factions, the cost of medics is being reduced. This change should make it easier for Soviet players to afford vital healing for both tech routes. Manpower cost from 250 to 200" Is T3 cheaper? yes or no Tankiovy Battalion Soviet tech costs are being adjusted with the Soviet Tankiovy Battalion having its price reduced while the price of the Mechanized Armor Kampenya has been increased. With the nerf to units such as the T70, there is no longer a reason for Soviet LVs to arrive much later than their counterparts "Cost from 240 manpower and 85 fuel to 200 manpower and 75 fuel" Is Mobilize reserves at T3 unlock cheaper? yes or no No longer requires Conscript Molotov and AT Grenade upgrades Does Mobilize Reserves provide extra utility with no additional cost? yes or no In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 22:15 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 21:26 PMHannibal No, I never said this a even single time. I disprove your point that Soviet tech is getting cheaper. You can simply answer my points, that's all there is. You can repeat that it were cheaper, that's not in line with the changes of the preview though. Is medic cheaper? Yes Is T3 cheaper? Yes Is Mobilize reserves at T3 unlock cheaper? Yes Does Mobilize Reserves provide extra utility with no additional cost? Yes You want to argue that AT grenade is now more expensive? it is fine by we can agree to disagree. Do you disagree with my original point that Soviet tech has already gotten buffs and does not need to be cheaper? Is this issue worth all these pages? certainly not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 21:23 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 21:08 PMHannibal ... I am not sure what you are arguing, that live tech gives better bonuses and is cheaper? What I have said and will say it again is that Soviet tech does not need to become cheaper the preview already has buffed Soviet tech. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 20:32 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 19:38 PMHannibal Yes, minimally faster T1 that will affect the first unit only and only if you do not build a second engineer. Better healing - true that, similar to other factions Soviet unit with larger number of entities benefit the most from healing and it also cheaper only for soviet. Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 19:38 PMHannibal Faster T3 - minimally faster with a nerfed/retimed T70. There is no added power to this as long as the T70 nerf compensates for 5 fuel, which it does. As I said, the option is to keep the M5 and SU76 useless, which you seem to be arguing for if you want to keep the old system. There is since 5 arrives earlier and can heal up very fast. Soviet get faster on field and healing and still have merge Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 19:38 PMHannibal MR: How is it 40 fuel earlier? At the very best, it comes 5 fuel from the AT/molo bundle + 10 fuel from T3 earlier, or did I miss something? Also calling it "better" is misleading. Conscript builds do not benefit at all (these builds rather got nerfed), so the "better" MR does not add any benefit. Penals now get benefit of reinforcement cost and veterancy gain (if I am not mistaken since I find the notes quite confusing about this). But I assume that this is not worth it spending resources at T3 (heck, the reinforcement benefit will never pay MR back until T4). So at this point it is more like a global buff to Penals at T4, similar to Ostheer. Penals needed some kind of buffs (or technically yes you could nerf everything else, but let's face the facts and work with buffs since this is what we got and get), since they were just not viable and bleed even harder than grenadiers. The T3 tech has been reduce by 20 and AT grenades/molotovs no longer required. The upgrade is superior since now it includes Penal and it has become available earlier in T3 from live Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 19:38 PMHannibal And please show how Soviet tech became cheaper. There was a bit of fuel shuffling, but even that not in large amounts. If you seriously want to count in molotovs to end up at a 5 fuel cheaper cost, than this discussion about that is rather pointless since those were simply not worth getting. Healing is cheaper and molotov/AT grenade bundle now has a discount. The tech is superior (faster T1/MR affects Penal for free/Healing is faster and cheaper/T3 earlier) and cheaper. Tech for certain is not less strong or more expensive. Is that a major buff? probably not but will see. Adding more buffs making even cheaper as suggested is simply not needed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Run and Gun5 Jan 2021, 18:52 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:45 PMHannibal Flamers I could see, but I don't think it is worth the effort since we are basically talking about only 3 units (M3, WC51 or how the dodge truck is called, and 250), two of which are doctrinal. SMGs are already 100% affected since their accuracy never reaches above 1. Where is the benefit of that? You forgot M3A3 M3 M5. Smgs are effected by accuracy but they are still more effective than other weapons in drive by due to high fire rate. In: Lobby
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback5 Jan 2021, 18:48 PM Unless I am mistaken PTRS ready aim times effect Guards PTRS also and increase the units AI. Given the PTRS has a range of 40 and 42.5 with "firing" positions out ranging infatry, PTRS fire destroys cover maybe it would better if the AT rifles used different firing modes vs soft and hard targets? AI in AT mode could then be reduced while the range in AI could be reduced to 35 without destroying cover while the damage and ROF could be adjusted so that damage does not come in big chunks. As an added bonuses it will be allot easier for user to know if the PTRS they are using has AI or not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback5 Jan 2021, 18:32 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 17:39 PMwandererraven PTRS Ready aim buff not benefit to Guard PTRS ? It is unclear from the patch notes. It seem that it applies to guards PTRs from test. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Run and Gun5 Jan 2021, 18:24 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jan 2021, 18:04 PMHannibal I assume you mean PTRS? This would mean a complete rework of many weapon delays. Otherwise Schrecks for example would suddenly not be touched at all. I mean flamer, smg,... The changes has to do with penalties that apply to the passenger (which is mostly accuracy) not the weapon themselves. In: Lobby