Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: is 2 needs buff6 Aug 2018, 18:03 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2018, 17:47 PMYRon²y ... i had an IS2 go to vet3 verry quickly but it doesn't do shiet. the only thing i see good about this tank is that it vets super fast, but the veterancy is useless. ... You are actually contradicting yourself, in order for the IS-2 to vet "verry quickly" it has to do damage and allot of it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Shocks6 Aug 2018, 13:49 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2018, 12:23 PMMaret IIRC shocks have only in 5 commanders: ... Actually 6. Anti-Infantry Tactics Counterattack Tactics Shock Motor Heavy Tactics Shock Rifle Frontline Tactics Soviet Shock Army Terror Tactics In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Shocks6 Aug 2018, 07:47 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2018, 06:49 AMThe amazing Chandler Dhsk is only available in 2 not so great commanders, Shocks are available in so many and good commanders. Actually most commanders with shock troops have a better equivalent with the superior Guards or the cheaper Ppsh conscripts. One of the few thing one does not get with Guards is the IS-2, but on the other hand you do not get the T-34/85, a very good medium tank, with shock troops. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About USF early game, how about finally buffing RE a bit?5 Aug 2018, 13:52 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2018, 13:37 PMNorthFireZ ...What ability in the game also have so much drawback? Seriously I’m asking since I can’t think of one. (Maybe the officer draw fire or maybe the KT locking turret? Idk) ... Storm troopers tactical advance get half speed and x150% target size Smgs Thompson tactical movement reduced speed and x150% target size Fire up reduced speed after effect TWP less damage Stun shot less damage and so on. Once more the ability is difficult to use and balance, remember it get better the longer it last and it get better with the vet 1 vet bonus and when BARs and Lmg are equipped. (edited to make number more clear, thanks sander93) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Shocks5 Aug 2018, 12:46 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2018, 12:13 PMThe amazing Chandler ... If they are so good why is nobody using them? Dhsk was OP for about 2 years, why nobody was using it? Shock may need a buff or redesign but the argument simply does not hold much water. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About USF early game, how about finally buffing RE a bit?4 Aug 2018, 13:52 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 13:37 PMNorthFireZ Thanks for clarifying I thought it was a vet two bonus. What is their base accuracy though and how does it compare to other units of the same category? (Like for example Combat engineers) Happy that I could be of help. R.E. have superior DPS than C.E. at all range and they are allot better at ranges closer than 10. Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 13:37 PMNorthFireZ Volley Fire can be a potent ability if it’s not hindered by an extreme and odd penalty. The suppression effect is very slow to take effect too and the negatives causes RE squads that actually uses the ability to bleed more FOR using one of their abilities. Volley fire has proven difficult to balance and there was a time that it was OP, what makes thing more complicated is that becomes allot better when R.E. pick up weapons. Currently the best way to use it without a weapon is when is garrison. Generally is a difficult ability to balance and it should probably be available only when equipped with m1919a6. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About USF early game, how about finally buffing RE a bit?4 Aug 2018, 09:57 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2018, 06:15 AMNorthFireZ ...Then again the RE never had good accuracy until vet 2 anyways so..... sniper will remain a problem until M20 pops out aye ... Actually RE get a x120 accuracy bonus at vet 1. Which quite a high bonus for vet 1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Paratrooper support squad bazookas3 Aug 2018, 06:57 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2018, 00:48 AMLoopDloop Must be because I'm comparing them to vetted rear echelons. I've noticed the panzerschreck misses a fair amount too. keep in mind Paras get x125% accuracy at vet 2. In addition Bazookas 100 damage each, 160/150/140 penetration First strike bonus 125 damage and 200/187.5/175 penetration on ambush on bazookas In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AI Grenade ratio usage per faction from GCS2 quali2 Aug 2018, 13:36 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2018, 13:24 PMEsxile ... 3 over 5 factions have the upper hand and it appears they all use free-tech nades (OKW and OS) or Meta (SOV with Penal/Guards).... If you want to establish the connection of grenades, winrates and early access I would suggest you watch the first 5 minute of all games and see how much damage/casualties can be attributed to grenades. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: AI Grenade ratio usage per faction from GCS2 quali2 Aug 2018, 11:15 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2018, 10:54 AMEsxile Nop, Sanders93 did. My opinion is if USF/UKF had a better Access to grenade, this could bring more balance in the fight between early and late game. ??? Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2018, 12:14 PMEsxile .... And one question for the debate: Does it exists a pattern between grenade usage and winrate? ... UKF have actually very cheap access to grenades. In addition OKW and Ostheer grenades access is completely different. Ostheer need to spend allot in research even for doctrinal units. Imo grenades should not be the determining factor in early engagements since they can be effected by RNG and Lag. Finally OKW Flame grenade access was introduced as the "lesser evil" in countering Maxim spam and imo flame-grenades should not be available stock to mainline infantry. I would be tempted to swap Ostheer mortars (and mg42) with Leig (and mg34). In: COH2 Gameplay