Profile of Tiger Baron

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 15:41 PMjagd wölfe

Or, balance patches could rework OKW so that it doesn't need to go for specific tiers for healing base and it has actual light vehicles counter besides Mech hq units (something, something, something USF tech rework and unit switch).

But we gotta rework volks mp40 for the third time and lock actually viable infantry at behind doctrines.
#priorities

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 03:46 AMJae For Jett

I think it would be good if you had an "other" option for each of the polls - some people might have a different idea than either of the two options provided.

As for the point about bundling, I get the sentiment behind it. Some abilities are bundled or not bundled seemingly arbitrarily (ie: why is the dozer bundled with 76mm shermans in mech, but a stand alone ability in the new urban assault company?). But I do personally think that the raw "5 abilities per commander" design is restricting for no real purpose. Bundling allows more control over the commander's design. It allows relatively lackluster abilities that aren't worth a slot alone to be in doctrines (like vipper pointed out with tank traps), but it also allows the power level of a commander to be more finely tuned. If a commander is lacking, but the abilities in it are all interesting and thematically appropriate, then bundling serves as a way to put more power into the commander without getting rid of the other interesting abilities.

Basically, I think commander's having 5 and always 5 slots unnecessarily limits the design space (and I think a lot of people agree). With the dozer ability, I think it's clear the ability hasn't hit its mark, and now that there's a better idea of where sentiments are on that doctrine, we're less scared to put more power into the doctrine and have the commander's abilities do more.

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 04:11 AMdistrofio

I wouldnt trust at all this poll, since these are really hot topics, i see people biased towards a faction to come and vote just the opposite of people wanting to play such faction.

Also allied polls have 2 options between changes but axis have a do/dont poll. The latter is obviously sabotaged. People hating OST can stop KT from being in OST as an example.

Sry OP, i find your curiosity and will to help as good as it can be, but people voting do not have such good will.

Edit: I find really curious that 14 people voted for E8 on USF to be bundled with dozers but also (The same) 14 people voted for OKM to keep the "normal" Tiger. Its no coincidence. I abstained my vote since i noticed this flaw.
Proof picture:
Show Spoiler

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 09:13 AMVipper

The Mech Logic is simply flawed.

First the buffed the WC51 to be worth a single slot then the bundle with the also buffed m3.

First the bundle dozer with the Sherman 76mm then the buff the Sherman and combine the vet 1 ability of the USF tanks with the superior T-34/76 vet bonuses.

The bundle should be used but only to fine tune commander and bring the at same power level. Not to create OP commanders and try to fix balance issues of factions.

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 10:13 AMaerafield

I like how that Poll doesnt have a "change nothing" option for the allies commanders. Do you want to imply here that these 2 things MUST be changed?

Rigged imo

Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2019, 10:21 AMSander93

Or the option to replace it with something else entirely.