Profile of Tiger Baron

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback3 Apr 2019, 19:56 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 18:54 PMSmartie A mechanized vehicle (250 HT with flamer upgrade) for Battlegroup HQ would be very welcome if you want to get rid of the Luchs /Puma into Heavy call-in. I can understand your opinion about the Sturmtiger but the unit is imo just not reliable thats why i would prefer the Brumm even above the much better reworked Sturmtiger version. Part of the reason they removed Radio Relay from Strategic Reserves was the lack of voice lines for the ability so yeah... I think the StuG III E will be your best bet for a new assault gun for OKW to be honest, again, just an opinion. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback3 Apr 2019, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 18:14 PMSmartie Some people will probably hate me but why not replace the Tiger I with the Brummbaer? I know of course that the Tiger was an integretal part of Kpen's submission and i can fully understand if you wanna stick to it. But in my eyes the Tiger offers more problems than solutions. So read at least my arguments for the Brummbaer before you call me a heretic Advantages of the Brummbaer: Brummbaer available in "Schweres HQ" Brumm fits to the theme Gives OKW elite and reliable AI, unit is much cheaper (65 fuel!!!)than the Tiger Unit would be awesome in combination with JP4, Brumm + JP4 = 290 fuel, Tiger I=230 fuel OKW players have to tech and cant be saved by a call-in heavy No offense dude but I would rather they reworked/fixed the Sturmtiger, OKW already has a doctrinal assault gun and it doesn't need another one, just my opinion. Plus there's voice lines for the Tiger and StuG call ins, and I think the MG crew mentions something of "loading up in a halftrack" so there's that as well. Maybe a StuG III E would fit in more tho, not to replace the Tiger I hope but it's a nice idea. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback3 Apr 2019, 17:47 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 17:35 PMVipper I would simply add a the Dozer and replace the Blades with a timed ability increasing the DPS from and against garrison or a some sort reckon. Reckon could anything from a plane to flares from mortars and pack howitzers. Easy8 simply belongs to another commander like armor. It really does probably belong in another commander but sadly we're not sure if they'll have a 3rd commander revamp or if they'll make new commanders after these so this might be the last chance for probably both Rifle Company and the E8. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback3 Apr 2019, 17:31 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 16:21 PMVipper USF - Urban Assault ver. 3 In my opinion: CP 0 Rear Echelon Rifle Grenades The ability is simply too strong for Rear echelons who no longer feel like rear echelons. They currently have Rifle-grenades, smoke and volley fire. R.E. are now turned into a more mobile mortar able to attack provide smoke and attack ground while being able to suppress... Once in garrison they difficult to dislodge, while in pit they can fire 2 rifle-grenades and can squad wipe. They are very effective vs lmg grenadier forcing them to move and lose DPS or cover. Suggestions: Upgrade should take up all weapon slot Move ability to riflemen and swap it with flamers from riflemen company CP 0 Renamed Urban Assault Kit Incendiary Grenades too strong in riflemen. M4A3 Shermans can now fire a single WP shell at the target position for 20 munitions. This ability seem very strong vs Paks. Suggestions: Move molotov to Rangers WP should be redesign to do damage vs garrison and not vs units in the open. CP 3 Rangers Unit is OP compared to PG for about the same manpower cost. Suggestions: Consider removing the damage reduction, reducing the Thompson DPS at range 15-20, removing extra slot. Or one can tone them down and move them to CP 2. CP 5 Cover to Cover Ability seems a better version of tactical movement. Could increase the power level of USF blobs, far better ability than fire it up. CP 10 Calliope The unit is rather difficult to counter and not really good in urban map. Suggestions: Replace with Dozer Agreed with most, but the doctrine already has the dozer blade upgrade so adding the 105 with the dozer would be an overlap. Maybe they could replace the Calliope with the E8 and give it the dozer upgrade? In: Lobby
Thread: British - Lend Lease Assault - Feedback3 Apr 2019, 17:30 PM Agreed on the Assault Section, might be easier to balance and tweak. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Which Tiger should OKW have？3 Apr 2019, 15:48 PM This poll doesn't make sense, in my one people voted for OKW keeping their Tiger instead of it being replaced by the Ace. But in my opinion the current Tiger should be put in the HQ and then locked behind 2 setup HQ trucks like it was done for the KT a long time ago. In: Lobby
Thread: NEW COMMANDER PREVIEW - Version 3.0 changes3 Apr 2019, 06:39 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 02:44 AMAiborne82 I still don’t understand why the British haven’t been given the standard Sherman yet. They are in desperate need of a better medium tank rather than a tank destroyer. After several testing periods the M10 is really just too fragile and although it can reliably penetrate the Panzer IV it can’t do so on the Panther which would have players buying the AEC or an antitank gun instead saving their fuel for a tank that can actually produce some offensive results. It’s really just somewhat irrelevant in the British roster and I’d really rather get a tank that can dish out a bit of both as opposed to the M10 which is incredibly circumstantial and dies to 3 anti-tank rounds You do realize that the shell switching is probably not gonna carry over to the UKF, right? In: Lobby
Thread: NEW COMMANDER PREVIEW - Version 3.0 changes2 Apr 2019, 23:11 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 22:54 PMJae For Jett And I wouldn't say that's a bad thing. Most of the posts are constructive, and it really helps when there is a clear majority that expresses there is an issue with an ability (as long as it does reach JLI levels of dead horse beating). When feedback from multiple people is consistent with each other, it's a useful indicator that the change isn't panning out (or that the intent of the change wasn't properly communicated...or something similar). I know I sound defensive since it's "my baby" but I really do believe that with some similar changes that were implemented in the previous commander revamp it could be something very practical and beneficial. I love Ostheer but they are simply outclassed when it comes to armor and repair or at least vastly overshadowed by OKW, with this commander and it's abilities that might drastically change. In: Lobby
Thread: NEW COMMANDER PREVIEW - Version 3.0 changes2 Apr 2019, 22:30 PM People are starting to sound like a broken record repeating the same issue over and over again. Just reduce the amount of repair pioneers to like 3 or 4 or however much the other Armies have, give it an upgrade that unlocks forward retreat point and the Radio Relay ability and give them to the command post bunker as well. There problem solved. In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback2 Apr 2019, 22:18 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 22:13 PMSmartie Some toughts about the changes: As much as i try to make my peace with the Forward Supply Station, i just cant.. 1. The whole theme of this commander is based on strong recon. If "Radio" has to be replaced because of technical issues... please replace it with "Early Warning Flares" (Ammoless recon for ammoless recon) but not with the Forward Supply Station. 2. Forward Supply Station is a unique ability for Wehrmacht. Thats why it should be given to a 2nd tier wehr commander like Festung Support doctrine who would be a lot more attractive with 1 simple change. It fits thematically 10 times better to this doctrine than to "Strategic Reserves". Just replace "Relief infantry" with the "Forward Supply Station" and you not only have given Wehr players a Forward Supply Station but also 1 more revamped commander. 3. Besides that i really like the doctrine and feel that no other changes are needed. Why not just go the 223 route and have an upgrade for the FSS that gives it the forward retreat point and Radio Relay? I mean it's what they literally did a couple of months ago, I don't see the problem of integrating it like that here as well. In: Lobby