Profile of Tiger Baron

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Schwerer Flak Truck Balance ideas15 Aug 2016, 08:24 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2016, 07:41 AMKatitof UKF forward assembly is fragile. Soviet FHQ is fragile. USF major+ambu combo is fragile. Wehr command+medic bunkers are fragile. Trucks are anything but fragile. None of those are 650 man power and 40 fuel when fully upgraded, well maybe except for the Soviet FHQ but nobody uses that anyway. The med HQ is a tech building that also produces your units unlike any of the ones you mentioned. Plus you can move the Major and Ambi, unlike any of the others. I'm forgetting the cost of the truck itself, so 100 mp and 15 fuel on top of that, so 750 and 55 fuel in Total, any of those cost as much? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Schwerer Flak Truck Balance ideas15 Aug 2016, 07:37 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2016, 20:28 PMaaa There is no such thing as axis side tech. Unit unlock is already so cheap that its beyond words. I was thinking that they just missed it So the medic and repair pioneer unlocks aren't side tech? The amount of resources you lose once you lose your fragile and static med truck? I can buy a KT for that man power or a Panther and some Volks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove the flamer from penals or14 Aug 2016, 16:34 PM Strange, a topic about Soviets and Misscommissar hasn't commented yet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Schwerer Flak Truck Balance ideas14 Aug 2016, 06:53 AM If you put a price on it you'll have to nerf the other side techs' costs so it's fair. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly <313 Aug 2016, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2016, 11:05 AMZombiFrancis It's like 2013 v 2016. Lmao. But on a side note, I should use it more with Croc, Hammer and Vanguard, been going Anvil and Special Weapons heavy these past games for the heavy sappers and half-track combo (mobility wise it's awesome on a big/long map) to get those quick repairs out. And besides, wanted to try that Screen with the regular Churchills, see how it goes, with their reduced price and all. Still shit tho. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Idea: Mortars vs. Tank Destroyers13 Aug 2016, 20:40 PM I believe it would be hard to implement if possible at all, but yeah. I know for sure you could make flamethrowers do damage to the crew in CoH tho. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Blobbing is so Prominent in Coh211 Aug 2016, 20:04 PM You're typically viewing this from a competitive standpoint tho. But I totally agree about the support weapons thing. An Army should have core Army features such as a mobile in-direct fire support unit (something which the Brits lack non-doctrinally), a good MG/suppression platform (MG34 and Maxim to some extent come to mind) and so forth. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Let's Test! 45mm ATG, Sd.Kfz 222, andISG performance11 Aug 2016, 12:29 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2016, 12:19 PMFiresparks being able to build your own is different from spoils of war. soviet mg42 crew get a 6 men crew, but most people accept it as result of soviet winning the fight. Oh gee, because capturing an enemy mortar and actually building one is going to be a huge fucking difference on it's performance, right? -.- In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Test! 45mm ATG, Sd.Kfz 222, andISG performance11 Aug 2016, 11:54 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2016, 11:02 AMFiresparks mortars (and artillery) in general get accuracy bonus firing at sighted target. (technically it's a penalty firing into FOW). scout units are generally fragile and specialized. Most of the time, artillery support is either barraging inaccurately into FOW or when your own troops is in a firefight. the british get sight bonus upgrade on its line infantry and medium tank. this make it easier for british to get sight without risk of return fire or needing to get specialized unit. British with mobile mortar can basically creep their way without coming under fire. and I've always said that that autofire range on the mortar emplacement need a nerf. I've already suggested in the somewhat old thread I posted Wait so every time I capture a German mortar as a Brit I'm actually OP? lmao More often than not you'll get it to vet 2 and it will die before you can reach vet 3, I've tried that numerous times and can even prove it. The only thing the mortar pit has it going for it is it's survivability compared to other mortars and it's range, damage wise as well but since it's 2 mortars instead of just 1 it's not really a big factor, stray mortar rounds wipe as it is, not saying how more often that happens with double mortars. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Test! 45mm ATG, Sd.Kfz 222, andISG performance11 Aug 2016, 09:40 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2016, 09:15 AMFiresparks a mortar would be problematic for the british. They have easy access to scout. their tommies get cover sight bonus at vet 1 and the bonus stack with spotter upgrade. The cromwell and comet also get sight upgrade as well. You mean to tell me a clone of the German GranatWerfer 34 would break the balance more than the 115 range double mortar pit? You've got to be kidding me, you are aware that mobile mortar crews die like flies to anything that touches them, right? Like fucking seriously ask any Wehr, Soviet or now USF player on how easy mortar crews die. No sorry I'm not going to take you seriously on this one, I'm done. In: COH2 Balance