Profile of tenid

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 232

General Information


Thread: Company Of Heroes 317 Dec 2015, 11:38 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2015, 08:43 AMKreatiir THQ went bankrupt while they were processing it. I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. As far as I know, only Relic ever held the engine rights - not THQ. They may have lost quite a bit of programming talent as staff left around the bankruptcy, but they are trying to replace them: http://hire.jobvite.com/CompanyJobs/Careers.aspx?k=Job&c=qds9Vfwt&j=o1jY1fw3 In: Lobby
Thread: British Medics buildable in the Forward Observation Post17 Dec 2015, 11:34 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2015, 06:22 AMRMMLz haha. snap. Neat example. More like a false comparison and yet another straw man that wasn't worth replying to, but whatever. There does seem to be a bit of confusion in terms here though. Some talking about the forward assembly and some talking about the forward observation post from tactical support. I'd support both personally. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Company Of Heroes 316 Dec 2015, 23:34 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Dec 2015, 11:20 AMKreatiir Can't be done. They use a certain engine, they don't make nor change it. I don't know where you get this from. Company of heroes (and Dawn of War 2) are based on the essence engine, which is Relic's proprietary engine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essence_Engine If they can't modify their own engine I'd be very surprised. In: Lobby
Thread: Why didn't I know the Road to Kharkov map has changed a lot?16 Dec 2015, 01:41 AM I'm not a huge fan of the open middle so far. It just feels a bit... plain, featureless. A few pieces of cover would make it look a bit more interesting for me. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Medics buildable in the Forward Observation Post16 Dec 2015, 01:33 AM I don't see why there's so much hostility here. It was a perfectly reasonable suggestion. And to deal with the straw man, at no point did anyone say the IS healing was bad. The only change I'd suggest is that they shouldn't be able to cap points. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Medics buildable in the Forward Observation Post15 Dec 2015, 22:41 PM Why not both? I don't think it would be massively game breaking, and it would mean you might actually see the british medics. I personally just don't like that they're locked behind a premium commander. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Enough is enough, fix the volks15 Dec 2015, 21:47 PM If they keep shrecks, remove the flame nade. They don't need that much utility. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50. Cal and Vickers vs OKW15 Dec 2015, 12:29 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2015, 12:20 PMFiresparks the m2hb in the game is more of a stand in for the much lighter and common m1919a4. if you just change the model and sound it actually wouldn't make much of a difference. Now that makes much more sense, thanks. Still a bit odd that they didn't change the name/model, but guess that's to do with unit lines etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Royal Artillery Regiment15 Dec 2015, 12:24 PM It really does seem like this commander is in their blindspot. I had thought the restrictions on concentrated barrage were because it could be blind fired (and even then it sucked a massive amount of resources for little effect). Then they just removed the blind fire. I still really want an explanation for this, since it was never a listed change. For all I know it could have been a mistake. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50. Cal and Vickers vs OKW15 Dec 2015, 12:17 PM I have to admit I find the idea of the M2HB as a "fast" machine gun a bit funny. Not for gameplay reasons, but historical. I know it's not a historically accurate game, but the M2HB was heavy. Very heavy. For example, the numbers I can get put the MG42 at 32 Kg, 20Kg of which was the tripod. The M2HB weighed 38 Kg for the gun alone. On the other hand, the M2HB had enough punch to be a threat to light armour. I'm by no means an expert on this, so if anyone knows more I'd like to hear their opinion. Again I'm not saying the game has to be perfectly historically accurate, just that sometimes the design decisions seem a bit odd in a historical context. In: COH2 Balance