Profile of MissCommissar

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 673

General Information


Thread: April 20th Update18 Apr 2016, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 19:53 PMDullahan If you build all the tiers.... Sov: 15 + 20 + 85 + 90 + 80 = 290 fuel for the first T-34/76 Ost: 15 + 40 + 20 + 35 + 75 + 125 = 310 fuel for PzIV OKW: 15 + 25 + 15 +60 + 15 +120 + 15+ 150 = 415 Fuel for PzIV Get rekt son. Someone forgot to add some fuel from M5 car from T3, cos you often need replacer on frontline and maybe 75-150 fuel for SU-76 for to keep enemy vechiles, cos you know what - USSR doesn't have panzerschrecks for those purpouses. So, while Ostheers and OKW can keep fuel for their tanks just spending ammo on shrecks, I have to spend fuel on tanks, cos I don't have any other effective AT. Specially, if I started with T1, not T2. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 20th Update18 Apr 2016, 19:43 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 19:40 PMDullahan The reason the t-34/76 is great is because of its cost effectiveness. It's only 80 fuel. The main gun is perfectly competent against both infantry and vehicles. Don't you understand why it cost 80 fuel? It is actuall T3 unit (like Pz4), which is putted in T4. That small price is not compensation of lack of power, but compensation of such late come. Just calculate, how much fuel you have to spend for to call first T-34-76 in combat and when it happens, compared with same Ostheers and Pz4. T-34-76 is real useless middle tank. No armor, no penetration, no accuracy, nothing. Calling that equial to throwing your fuel and MP in black hole. For that reason, people more rare build T4, cos it has only 1 usefull unit - Katysha. Su-76 is good equialent of Su-85 and T-34-76 is shitty tank. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 20th Update18 Apr 2016, 19:34 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 19:31 PMDullahan Actually yes. T-34/76 is a great unit. Then... maybe MG-34 is a great HMG or KV-1 is great heavy tank... And then axis tanks should be not just great, but outstanding, lol. Axis and UK's. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 20th Update18 Apr 2016, 19:27 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 19:25 PMDullahan Penals are great right now. Yea, I guess that's a reason, why almost nobody use them and even don't build T1, prefering T2 with those Maxims... Right now both tiers are useless, well done Relic, well done. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 20th Update18 Apr 2016, 19:24 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 19:20 PMTheSleep3r no penal batallion changes Yea, just understand it: "We made Maxim worse, so it won't replace mainline infantry anymore". Ok dudes, what about BUFFING DAMN MAINLINE INFANTRY!? It still sux! Why are you nerfing one unit for to make another more attractive? Buff Conscripts, buff Penals. Nerfing Maxims won't make Cons/Penals more popular - they still bad. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 20th Update18 Apr 2016, 19:17 PM I like it, really. Make Maxim cost 260 MP and set-up longer. Without buffing arc of fire or suppression... I just don't understand, they last time buffed 222 scout car without increasing cost or something like that, but Maxim they nerfing without any buffs in back... Is that some kind of joke - we will buff axis without balancing and nerf soviets without compensation... Just don't understand... want to cry. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: One "Major" problem - USF reconnaissance18 Apr 2016, 14:57 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 14:49 PMInsanePriest If one of you forum warriors and balance "experts" would only dedicate half the time you waste on creating new balance threads and actually play & enjoy the game: 1) you would actually get something out of your time (playing / having fun / making own strats work) 2) you would not waste our time 3) this forum would be less flooded and more enjoyable Ok, I got it, not try to tell us something about topic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: One "Major" problem - USF reconnaissance18 Apr 2016, 12:59 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 12:54 PMbert69 What? Major recon useless? LOL What if I tell you major recon is probably THE only useful ability the major has? Read it again. Major recon is cool, but what for they added pretty same recon in doctrines? If I have it already without any, maybe they will put in doctrines something really useful? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: One "Major" problem - USF reconnaissance18 Apr 2016, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 11:15 AMCadianGuardsman They were changed because they were clear no trainers. Vet Riflemen with access to flame throwers while awesome and thematic were broken as hell. Elite Troops led to massive rage as you weren't punished for loosing veteran units late game, Soviet Industry allowed T-34 Spam, enough said. That's offtop, but anyway: Vet riflemans weren't broken at all. With vet 1 they only gained AT-grenade - very needed against those days kubels. Vet 2 or even 3 were pretty rare... Elite troops worked nicely and weren't broken again. You making you unit vet, but making your Tier progression slower, so while you have entire army of vet-grenadeers - your enemy already making Shermans or T-34-76s. So, it was very nice balanced with high fuel cost of vet-ability. And soviet industry allowed T-34 spam... is bad? No, seriously? Bro, it is not Panther, it is damn T-34-76. It only can be effective in numbers more than 3. So, that's a real reason, why T-34-76 become so bad right now. Before it was more or less useful with Industry. Without it - there are no way to spam enough T-34-76 for to outnumber your enemies. So, I guess they should make doctrines back as they were - cool and uniqe. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call of USSR: Modern Warfare18 Apr 2016, 11:59 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2016, 09:22 AMOsinyagov You know what? You should duplicate this theme on official forum. You can do it then. I can't enter in offcial forums, some kind of bug maybe. And also, Im banned there for 2-3 years already, so... In: COH2 Gameplay