Profile of aerafield

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2021, 01:02 AMCreativeName

What i dont understand is why seeking or in this case Kimbo is the one who had to deliver the context for this clip. Isnt it the job of those who accuse him of cheating to prove that the situation doesnt allow anything else than a maphack to be the explaination before Seeking has to defend his position?
How many of those clips can be explained with the context of the situation instead of Seeking writing an essay about why, when, how and what his feelings, hopes and dreams were in an intense game?

Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2021, 23:58 PMCreativeName

?

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2021, 20:37 PMaerafield

The biggest problem for me are still all the clips where it was argued "it happened on the edge of FoW, and FoW is badly synced in replays". Those are the katyusha clip, the volks sandbag vs pathfinder clip and the assgren sprint clip mainly.

In all of them, Seeking repeatedly said (even on stream), that he reacted that way because he saw the units. Which is kind of 100% debunked at this point as others mentioned... on top of the fact that there is still 0 proof yet that fog of war is poorly synced in a replay.

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2021, 19:57 PMVonIvan

Ah I thought it was because of the il2 overhead, I see the timing of it now actually. Not sure how he saw that blob incoming then

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2021, 15:30 PMRosbone

The one issue I have with this clip is that the unit capping the fuel was moving towards the sandbag volks also. Seeking may have reacted to that unit, not the approaching paths. Is that possible?

Asking you cause I am noob.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 23:31 PMPip

There's a bare minimum amount of input lag that literally any player will have simply due to how networking functions, and there's 1/5th of a second (or thereabouts) of reaction time to take into account, even if Seeking has "very fast reactions". If the replay isnt significantly desynched, then I don't think it's a reasonable thing for him to have "Reacted" to. FoW would have to be quite different in the replay to how it was in the live game for it to really make sense.

If there's an inconsistency with the replay, I'd have thought it more logical that the opposing player would appear to react slightly /slower/ than they "actually" did, rather than more quickly?

I think we need more data points/a thorough examination of Replays to know for sure one way or another tbh.