Profile of Stark

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1

General Information
Timezone: UTC


Thread: New Commander concepts.12 Jul 2018, 09:38 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jul 2018, 17:36 PMnigo My ideas: ... Soviet commander Valentine at 6 cp is way too late unless you buff this version of a tank (like Crecer13 wrote) Recon Soviet tools is kinda useless imo. Takes slot for something late game. In this design commander wouldn't be used becouse it simply not effective late game (teamgames) and expect probably opie upgrade for cons no effective tools and call ins. British land lease though is a good idea of a commander for soviets. Just needs diffrent design. OKW Command King Tiger - don't add/make units that can be potensially OP like old tiger ace. It's not needed. Generally this commander proposition is meh. Brings nothing new (expect ostheer sniper) and it's mix of low cp abilies and units with potensially really opieOP unit OKW lacks of AT weapon in their commander lists. Tank Hunter OKW doctrine would be perfect for it. Adding hetzer tank destroyer (available in T0 after teching T1 and T2), new infantry squad with shrecks (4 model jeager with panzerbushe and upgradable 2 shrecks), some call in arty - that's what okw needs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander concepts.9 Jul 2018, 14:42 PM I would prefer 1st Polish Armoured Division #Say_No_USSR In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M4A3E8 "Easy Eight" Sherman versus M4A3 (76) Sherman9 Jul 2018, 11:23 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2018, 07:22 AMmondeogaming1 E8 is much much better than 76 mm gun standar shemran . E8 is my favourite tank in the game but some revamps at the commander wouldnt hurt who knows, maybe new USF commander will include a e8s In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander concepts.9 Jul 2018, 09:45 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2018, 09:43 AMQvazar Panzer Elite, OKW commander Light Vehicle Support: Call-in one or both of: * SdKfz 250/10 Light AT Halftrack (Stuns vehicles. Is this in the game files somewhere?) Hull Down SdKfz 250/3 or SdKfz 223, Funkwagen "Vampire" Halftrack Jagdpanther I miss CoH1's PE faction.. We can use units abilities and models that are already in game... @GJ I really like idea of French resistent commander. But shouldn't it be in USF commander? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commander Rework approach7 Jul 2018, 15:22 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2018, 12:44 PMVipper Hezter/Ostwind should not require T3 since they are specialized tanks or should be call-ins from base similar to KT and thus available even in T3 is lost. Eh, more uniquness. T3 has already tank destroyer - jp4, hetzer is similar to jp4 so why put it there? Make it buildable from a T0 but after require a T1 and T2 (med and mech). This allow player to diffrent strats without going t4. Unique and special... To not make this strat opieOP Hetzer will have low penetration therefore it won't be good vs heavies and that's gonna be his counter. If you put hetzer (like ostwind right now) you will kill that unit at release. It's already plenty of units in that tech, there is no need to put anymore which won't act better on battlefield than jp4. You will get m10/jakson situation one more time. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger balance fix: smoke launchers7 Jul 2018, 10:33 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2018, 06:28 AMGI John 412 How about this, if it is underperforming for its cost then just reduce its cost until it performs the same, but isn’t UNDER performing FOR COST. You won’t break the balance, but you will see it more often because it is more accessible. Reduce fuel and manpower cost a little. Reduce popcap cost a little Improper veterancy rate a little This way you get it more often and it gets better if you can keep it alive to earn its veterancy bonuses, which it now could actually get because of its lower veterancy requirements. Keep it simple. Reduce cost. Boost veterancy. Have a beer. Cheers! +1 simple solutions usually are the best. Do it and see what happen In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to nerf Mobile Defense without it becoming CAS6 Jul 2018, 20:25 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2018, 13:20 PMVipper C p. is also available to other commander it should not be nerf more just because it in M.Defense. The commander should be redesign and the C. P4 removed from the commander since it has both AI and AT vehicle call-ins. It the same story with Elephant and stuka dive bomb that should not exist in the same commander. What about ISU, guards and IL-2 bombing strafe? KV-1, ml-20, guards and il-2 strafe in guard combine commnader? Are they fine? becouse i don't think so In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Second Commander Rework6 Jul 2018, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2018, 12:39 PMSneakEye I wonder how you would change them. Are shocks that bad? They are hard to use in open maps, but I read that many people think they're bad everywhere. Ps. I don't play 1v1, but I'm curious They aren't bad. They just not worth getting. Look at soviet commander design. In guard rifle commander you can have guards as a long range elite infantry better than any ostheer infantry and most okw squads, you have kv-1, ml20, il-2 strafe and ppsh upgrade for cons (making then small shocks squad with extra snare and ohraa). This commander is so perfect that you don't need anything else. Most of the players will pick long range elite squad above close range and that's the simple true. Zombii and Lago gave good arguments too. How to balance shocks to make them more atractive without making them a walking tank shock troops... i have no idea In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Second Commander Rework6 Jul 2018, 11:14 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2018, 11:05 AMKatitof And shock troops commanders aren't bad in themselves, shocks are. Exactly Changing shocks will bring new light on all of these commanders. No point touching them right now, better see how they work after shocks rework In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Second Commander Rework6 Jul 2018, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2018, 18:34 PMAarotron OKW: id add stug to this doctrine. I see stug as good choice as it would work for commander focusing on improving vehicles, as cheaper at vehicle that can take basic tank duties would be decent addition. I notice there is a mistake in that post You wrongly texted word ~~Stug IIIG~~ -> Hetzer tank destroyer In: COH2 Gameplay