Profile of Zyllen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 770

General Information


Thread: OH recent buffs. Justification?18 Oct 2015, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 20:30 PMTheSleep3r Pardon me, but nearly complete refusal of Soviet tier 1 and T-34/76 isn't really valid. I am aware that these are implications of his points and not exactly those. WTF tier 1 was always countered by the 221/222 . so that argument is stupid. and t-34? who gives a fuck. a fine tank for its cost but allied fanboys want to spam it. second part the su76 makes ostheer mediums even less relevant. All his arguments are simply shit all the while the okw and ost are doing very poorly because of the recent buffs to the allies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OH recent buffs. Justification?18 Oct 2015, 20:11 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 18:24 PMTheSleep3r Some of his points are correct though. But still invalid because the soviets and USF got some major buffs themselves. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?17 Oct 2015, 10:54 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 10:24 AMVaz I think the 76 has always been marred by this issue of how effective it is vs how quickly it gets lost. German AT knocks this thing out in a single second sometimes. The armor is absolutely worthless. The gun does not wreck infantry or tanks. The tank itself is not really that fast. It's just good at nothing. On top of that, you can't really spam it, because the pop cap is high enough to where you can only get about 3 or 4 of these sub par tanks. Newsflash : AT is meant to destroy medium tanks. And what low lever are you playing where you think its a good idea to spam generalist medium tanks? no faction spams generalist medium tanks any more. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?17 Oct 2015, 10:52 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 09:58 AMHat Its in the game and costs more than a Panzer V and is weaker in everyway. The 85 needs a buff along with the 76 The amount of stupid bias in your posts is really starting to irk me. the 85 is superior to the p4 in both hp and penetration and unless the rng god is pissed at you the 85 will win any engagement with the p4. also the 85 is better at AI because of lower scatter In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?16 Oct 2015, 16:07 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 11:33 AMdasheepeh its quite easy with the puma imo a vet t34/76 is borderline a miracle same as KV1 / 8 Ni it isnt, but even so vet 4/5 for the puma is not useful anyway In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?16 Oct 2015, 16:05 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 10:30 AMOmega_Warrior If soviets want grenade, snare, and healing and reach a T-34 that will be 1190mp. For ostheer to have the same it's only 700mp + 60muni. That's not a lot USF needs 690mp + 25 fuel to get Major and ambulance and that's with 0 upgrades. Point being we can shave off around 100 manpower to tech to T4 to premote T4 play. Seeing as it's rather weak and undesirable at the moment. Would still not change a thing. all medium tanks have fallen out of favour for the dedicated ones. Tier 4 soviets is pretty much the same as the ostheer tier 4. utility but not mandatory. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?15 Oct 2015, 15:28 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 15:15 PMGecko2k3 +1 There is no point on teching tier 3 + tier 4 to do the useless t34 that fails in general AI and AT. Need several rework, hard to see the most common tank in WW2 never used on every high level game. To be honest every medium tanks does that. these days its all about the specialised TD's and AI tanks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak Halftrack13 Oct 2015, 00:17 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 23:16 PMelchino7 Stuff Lets just say i dont approve of using bugs ever. And since we both agree that this units need to be buffed lets leave this behind us. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak Halftrack12 Oct 2015, 22:14 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 20:55 PMImagelessbean I think elchino7 has demonstrated he is more than competent with this game. The comment is rude and his point still stands. You don't attack move into their base, you attack move slightly ahead and it rolls forward to deal with infantry while setting up. If his infantry are able to gobble up your Flak HT you already need to be on the defensive with it. Set up time will not change that. No his point doest stand. he is abusing a bug . furthermore if you dont position your atht perfectly you risk that the damn thing fires on something that blocks its shot. The advice is worthless and coming from someone that doesn't use this unit at all or he would have known. past accomplishments not withstanding but eclhino is simply talking shit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak Halftrack12 Oct 2015, 20:15 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2015, 19:46 PMWingZero No, I would rather keep the set up time. This HT can suppress instantly, high dps and splash damage. Why fix something that is not broken? Same thing for the m5 quad and usf aa track they are all mobile however. In: COH2 Balance