Profile of JoeH

Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2016, 23:02 PMGhostTX

Not so much overperforming, but now it's been buffed to perform better against light vehicles (ex M20). So, for USF, the ONLY non-doc anti-sniper vehicle has MORE units to be wary of. Do tell, what counter-sniping tactic are you going to use now since 222 chase down the M20 and kill it faster/easier?

Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 13:43 PMferwiner

If we are talking 3v3 an 4v4 there is no need for usf to have at gun at all, brits and soviets can do this if players arent competent enough to use usf at guns to full potentiall. But on the other hand thanks to 70 range it should be the best at gun on open spaces that happen to exist only in team games. Will it bounce? Ofc, but other at guns wont even shoot at this range. Also dont tell me that all you have when kts arrive is one at gun

Also mind that even without ap shells it still has better pen than p4. And you use p4s to kill tanks, dont you?

Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 08:01 AMvarunax

The combined arms ability actually makes the Pershing shoot slower at Vet 3. It also uses MG42 sounds when it should be using .30 cal machine gun sounds.

Other than that, it costs too much fuel for what it does. It's worse than a Tiger, but costs the exact same as a Tiger. IMO the fuel cost should be reduced to around 205. Which is in between a Panther and Tiger.

The saddest part of it all, is that this Pershing is actually weaker/worse than the Pershing in vCoH. The Pershing in vCoH could consistently win against a Tiger and even take on 2 Panthers at once. This Pershing can barely take on 1 Tiger depending on RNG and will lose to 2 Panthers.

Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 20:56 PMPanzerschützen

Yeah and reduce it's anti infantry capabilites to the same degree too, uh?