First 6 DLC commanders for WFA (3 for USF and 3 for OKW) were released with release of WFA. Then, with release of UKF were released 3 DLC commanders for UKF. Then, were released two packs (each include 1 commander for USF and another 1 for OKW).
And in the end were released two UKF commanders, but you need to remember, that UKF didn't get commanders, when each of USF and OKW get two commanders.
If you don't understand, what i said (because my English not good enough):
Normally, Relic released commanders by two. So, if you want Red Army commander, you need also to release Ostheer commander.
And if you want USF commander, you need also to release OKW commander, and optionaly UKF commander.
What does it mean? It means, that Relic should first to make new commanders for Ostheer, OKW, and optionally for UKF, and then releasing Red Army commander with Ostheer commander, or releasing USF commander with OKW and UKF commanders
Didnt they release a bunch of USF and Brit commanders without axis counterparts?
Sadly the same as most things axis the panther is very bad at the moment. It is just there so allied fanboys can get off on "MUH TACTICS" when they click move their blob into your army. Paks and Stugs are by no means much better but you will live if you lose a Stug. Also you might even be able to win with a Stug + P4 combo but you have to be REALLY lucky.
American aircraft dropped leaflets with Japanese messages saying to leave Hiroshima or Nagasaki respectivly as well as 33 other cities as a warning to the entire populus of those cities. The Japanese superiors forbid the Japanese populus from reading these notes with threats of treason and execution. Japan also did not surrender prior to the American nuclear bombings OR inbetween the 2. Was it horrendous? yes. But I'd rather 100,000 people die instantly than having 200,000 American soldiers die fighting for every inch of the Japanese mainland. Not even including possible Soviet casualties or other nations. The Japanese also commited perfidy which is the intentional deceit of soldiers to lure into traps. As a reason to why your grandfathers friend was possibly killed.
They could have easily dropped the nuke on one of the island they were fighting over. Or you know drop it into the ocean. The after effects of nuclear contamination were hugely unknown at the time (You could get an x-ray in a mall without any form of protection till the 60s). So do not give me that bullshit excuse of "but they would have contaminated the oceans". Also the bombs killed 200,000 civilians and the expected casualties of an ongoing campaign were estimated to be 40,000. So there goes your justification. Truman knew this and still ordered it to be done. On the other hand why are you trying to justify this shit in the first place. This post was meant to show that no matter the side atrocities were committed. Would the holocaust been less horrible if they "only" killed 200,000 jews? Heck no. Rounding up people based on race/religion and killing them is wrong no matter how many you kill. Knowingly killing innocents and surrendering soldiers is wrong no matter how many you kill. That is why its dumb to demand any kind of unit not to appear in a game. If you dig hard enough you can find dirt on most militaries in the world and we would be left with a game that is bland as fuck. If it offends you play a fantasy or scifi rts.
American soldiers shoot and killed my grandpas best friend when they approached on of their outpost with white flags, just out of spite. Calling the dropping of not one but two nukes on civilian a "military necessity" is a very cheap excuse and you should be deeply ashamed as a human being to use that argument (to me you are utterly despicable). If you do so go and reevaluate your life choices, you clearly need a lessen in human decency.
Germany did commit atrocious war crimes but you must have your head buried very deep where the sun dont shine if you think that justifies allied war crimes. On the human misery scale all factions were pretty close.
Relic gave these units ominous names so they avoid the controversy that comes with it and we should not go around and make vague connections to try to stir up unneeded discussions. If they wanted to portray the actual Brandenburg division they would have named them that.
On topic - In my opinion ostruppen are fine currently, they're durable early game, cheap and cost effective. Of course late game they fall off but that's a fair exchange for the early game power they game. You can use them as supporting infantry in the late game and use them for capping, scouting etc..
Off-Topic
By that logic we need to nerf Cons, hard. Swarm and cap map early game and get insane received acc and utility late game.
I dont know about buffing them but giving them more utility would be nice. Kinda like Cons, even though Cons dodge bullets better then Neo in late game. So maybe do the same for Osttruppen?
Rudog999
cel.metsu
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
