Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Rak 43 proposal10 Mar 2019, 02:08 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2019, 23:44 PMVipper Anti-Tank Gun Ambush Tactics (affects all relevant Soviet Commanders) AT Gun Ambush Tactics is being given a First-Strike Bonus to improve the ability’s potency when firing from stealth. First Strike bonuses to -25% reload, +20% accuracy, +20% penetration CP requirement from 5 to 3 So is it just the vehicle part thats unique to Tank Hunter? Some part of that ability is unique to that Commander I swear. The changelog is confusing cause I can only find it in the revamp In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rak 43 proposal9 Mar 2019, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2019, 21:29 PMthedarkarmadillo Also I just Che ked the ability guide, it says the zis camo doesn't grant a bonus can someone confirm? I know for a fact that it gives a first strike bonus on Tank Hunter Commander. His camo also works for vehicles though, so I believe the version of the ability on all other commanders does not provide the bonus In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rak 43 proposal9 Mar 2019, 20:30 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2019, 12:11 PMVipper Actually Zis get a huge buff with first strike bonus and Zis camo would be buff to Rak. ATGs should simply not be able to move when cloaked only to rotate Isn't that only on Tank Hunter Tactics? Because his ambush tactics also applies to vehicles, but other commanders have it just for the ZiS In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rak 43 proposal9 Mar 2019, 02:39 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2019, 02:31 AMFarlon Garrisoning raketen is completely useless because it won't prioritize vehicles anymore. Well that sounds like something that should be fixed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rak 43 proposal9 Mar 2019, 02:04 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2019, 00:42 AMKoRneY raks are more durable than paks? I feel like if you sneeze on them their volksturm crew will run for the hills *They would be if they had a 5th man. This is in the context of the suggestion I made in the OP, but I think people favor a different route anyway Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2019, 20:10 PMVipper 1) Veterancy overhaul so that bonuses do not revolve mostly around cloak and also benefit garrison I very much agree with this especially the garrison part. I don't know if it's not functional enough or there's not a lot of maps where it's effective, but I don't see/use this feature enough. My hunch is that camo makes using buildings with the Rak not worth it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rak 43 proposal8 Mar 2019, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2019, 20:18 PMFlyingsmonster but changing its range to 60 and making it unable to retreat just turns it into a slightly weaker Pak40 with 10 less penetration. That option included an extra man, so it would be more durable than the Pak and it can still be garrisoned. But I included different options for that exact reason, I don't think it's good for the game if it all the units slowly become more similar. I think retreat should maybe be disabled when camoflauged. Give removing camo a 5 second timer, and now you can't have people just hitting "T" everytime they get discovered. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rak 43 proposal8 Mar 2019, 19:38 PM I think the camo and creeping has broken this AT gun. Some tweaking is needed, meaning nerfs and buffs. My idea would be give it a 5th man and 60 range. In exchange it loses camo and the ability to retreat. If people want camo to stay for the flavor of assymetry, than you shouldn't be able to move while camo'd and the pack-up time should be longer while it's active. I also think it should need cover to camo like a stealth squad The retreat function is what enables this agressive creeping because otherwise you'd be giving away a free Rak to your opponent everytime you did it. Hence why no one ZiS creeps even if they have ambush tactics In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks Incendiary Grenade8 Mar 2019, 18:38 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2019, 21:17 PMFarlon We can do that if the trucks become free to call in. I want to add a 15 fuel cost and you want to take away 45 fuel in costs. Explain that to me? One upgrade of 150mp and 15 fuel for both stgs and flame nades. Don't see how that makes OKW unplayable. Volks are too cost effecient, here's an increase to their cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks Incendiary Grenade7 Mar 2019, 20:45 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2019, 09:39 AMblvckdream Locking Volks out of STG44s for flame nade access and removing Stuka would make OKW a trash tier faction. Why? Why would forcing them to spend a whopping 10-20 fuel and 100-150mp to force them to unlock stuff for their mainline make them a trash tier faction? No one's locking anyone out of anything, were forcing some actual decision making on OKW... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the Firefly have to suck so much? 7 Mar 2019, 20:37 PM It's very telling that you included most stats except damage per shot. Firefly is the only non-heavy TD that does above 160 from the get-go. It even gets more damage with vet. DPS is always a strange choice for measuring TDs. If they're taking damage then you're either going for a dive or making a mistake. TDs aren't trying to kill tanks faster than the tank can kill them, they're trying to kill the tanks without taking fire at all. In: COH2 Balance