Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 05:57 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 00:10 AMVipper I am glad that we got past the theories that is comparable to rocket arty and MHTs. By we do you mean you? Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2019, 17:23 PMVipper You are truing to described the Scott as a fragile vehicle, it is not. It actually one of the most difficult to kill indirect fire unit. The Scott is extremely durable, very mobile while being more effective than the majority of "mortar" weapons having able to hit moving target and having a kill radius of 1.25. The Scott is great. But the last thing I would nerf is it's durability. Its range is the reason it's durable. Just lengthen the reload of auto-fire, and maybe increase it's on-the-move penalty In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?3 Mar 2019, 17:40 PM I keep reading people who say getting 2 of these is nasty. The only thing nasty here is the micro of the person using two scotts. That's a lot of fuel AND attention being given to anti-infantry. It's not like a kv8 or Brumbarr that can tank shots, you have to babysit 2 really fragile units for this to work. Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2019, 17:23 PMVipper You are truing to described the Scott as a fragile vehicle, it is not. It actually one of the most difficult to kill indirect fire unit. Yes it's very durable when compared to mortar half-tracks and werfers. What exactly is that saying? Not a whole lot. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why artillery pieces don't fire smoke shells?1 Mar 2019, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 17:38 PMSeductiveCardbordBox Not if it takes the same time to fire a barrage. A few huge shells or a much quicker fire/load/ready time would be needed to offset the usual slow, steady punch that a howie gives. I think 3 or 4 smoke shells would get the job done. They'd presumably be larger than your average smoke shells. Could put white phosphorus on the priest. I find the creeping barrage pretty useless unless I'm missing something In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Conscript Utility1 Mar 2019, 19:23 PM Anyone ever thought about delaying penals later? Feel like that gives more flexibility for improving cons, and you could even rework penals a bit. Put a weapon upgrade for cons behind t1, any maybe mollys too. Move penals to t3 or 4 and adjust accordingly. Would be drastic but just an idea In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer MG/Early1 Mar 2019, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 15:55 PMJulianSnow Isn't making a single unit more expensive a nerf to the whole faction? Pretty sure it is.. No it really isn't. Here's a list of Ostheer units that won't be affected: Literally all of them except the mg42 "Oh but it will effect timing and it delays other units" Very VERY slightly yes. If you think this will be a critically debilitating change than you have an unhealthy bias towards Ostheer. Then of course there's the fact I've already said I want to increase the cost of all MGs. And the performance of most of them too In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer MG/Early1 Mar 2019, 15:39 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2019, 02:46 AMdistrofio Is that hard to say: "OST DOESNT NEED A NERF"? Can you stop whining about Ostheer? This isn't about Ostheer, its about 1 unit in their headquarters compared to the equivalent units on other factions. It's as much about Ost as it is about anyone else Stop talking about "all you people wanting to nerf ostheer." Stop. Please ****ing stop. I want to increase the price of one unit. If you can't handle a discussion about that, you don't belong on the forums. If I'm talking about 1 unit. And then you say "nope can't touch it the faction is UP" then there's no point in discussing anything. This game is way too good for factions to be flatly overpowered. There's certain units and strats that are, on all 5 rosters In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer MG/Early28 Feb 2019, 21:04 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2019, 18:49 PMkdragoonD MG42 has been like that for a few years. Most people are fine with it, so if you are not able to deal with it, it is really a you problem instead of the game's. Also, please take the asymmetrical balancing into the consideration. Maxim isn't shit. It's shit compared to the 42, which has the same price but doesn't need a building. No one's ignoring assymetry, the gap just doesn't need to be this big. Very tired of people saying "assymetrical balance" like it ends the conversation. It doesn't, look at AT guns. Aside from the Rak their performance is all much more consistent, and the Rak is still very capable just in a different way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Anyone else meet this joker from time to time?27 Feb 2019, 23:14 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2019, 21:55 PMvonAsten +1, pretty sad that anno 2019 there are still so many retards that use it to insult others. You mocking me? This isn't some PC thing, I have autism in my family. It's wildly misunderstood, because of people using it situations like this In: Replays
Thread: Anyone else meet this joker from time to time?27 Feb 2019, 21:15 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2019, 16:07 PMJoshua85 Amazing level of Atism What's the asterisk for? So you didn't actually type Autism? It's not a curse word, just a medical condition that is wildly misunderstood by asshles like you In: Replays
Thread: Discuss for the votes26 Feb 2019, 19:43 PM Am I the only one who's terrified of this patch? We just got done fixing the the issues from the last commander patch, and those weren't even new commanders. Hate to be a pessimist but adding/tweaking JUST commanders seems like it makes balance a whole lot worse. In: Lobby