Profile of TheSleep3r

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 670

General Information


Thread: Call ins: The overlooked problem6 Jan 2017, 16:51 PM This is actually a very good idea. Bulletins for call-in units would finally have some use In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Best single player realism mods/tuning & experience?27 Dec 2016, 19:12 PM Try the Iron Hearts campaign Link to chapter 1, played it for a while. You have several soldiers to your disposal, might wanna check it out. http://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=471901240 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.3 Update25 Dec 2016, 11:58 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2016, 08:59 AMMrSotkoGaming historically they were given the worst equipment, often times given sticks and told to run directly across minefields and at defensive positions. the only rifles they got were the ones they beat out of the hands of germans if they could. murrica and enemy at the gates is strong in this one In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WHY are soviets the center of winter balance patch18 Dec 2016, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2016, 17:51 PMTheMachine Don't take the vocal minority of people whining on the forums who haven't played the mod as word that nobody likes the changes. People who are neutral or positive about the changes are less likely to comment, angry/negative people are always more likely to engage with any internet thing. Especially as those people are probably actually playing the mod instead of endlessly theory crafting on the forums. 10 people commenting on a thread isn't representative of the entire community. So you're working as you wish, implementing ideas heard never before that everyone (anyone?) that is positive about them is silent, ignoring the <<vocal minority>> completely despite so many solid counterarguments I've read. I've played your balance mod and I hope after the tournament your team will admit the direction of these changes is wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WHY are soviets the center of winter balance patch18 Dec 2016, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2016, 17:30 PMTheMachine But now I think we're happy with where Soviet T1 is too bad there are about 3 of people who like this change In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.3 Update17 Dec 2016, 09:52 AM AT penals were a mistake. They were supposed to be used alongside conscripts, expensive enough so you literally had to make some cons which also provided AT support. Now it's a molotov-ptrs penal clusterfuck. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M42 change ideas - Winter Patch 1.2 / 1.3 / 1.413 Dec 2016, 22:06 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2016, 21:59 PMBudwise Why is access to one of the better AT guns in the game at T2 not enough? Please just stop this agenda of giving Soviets more and more AT. I really feel like you guys are just f-ing with stuff just to f with stuff. Aside from saving the M-42 from the UP abyss, the whole thing is about not letting the horrible idea of PTRS penals (at least for now, without said AI upgrade) to happen In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WinterBalance 1.213 Dec 2016, 16:39 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2016, 14:59 PMMr.Smith To give you an idea about what a hopeless team weapon looks like, try to imagine yourself, playing as OST and coming across 3 abandoned Soviet PM-41 mortars. Would you ever waste the manpower needed to recrew them? I bet not. You probably wouldn't even bother destroying them, so that your enemy can waste more of their manpower to recrew them. M-42 shouldn't be such a hopeless unit. Why are you talking about a hopeless team weapon with no intention of fixing it just before a patch as one of the guys repsonsible for it? It's not like it doesn't affect infantry scaling at all, which is in scope I'm not nagging just genuinely curious In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PTRS penals informative poll11 Dec 2016, 09:01 AM Conscripts were always supposed to be Soviet core infantry. Like Wehrmacht and OKW, they had to have some utility infantry (cons) to throw nades and things like that, and some elite infantry to take care of infantry. Now PTRS penals completely shits on that design, removing conscripts from the equation. Player can either go conscripts, at nades and doctrinal infantry or go T1 and go full penal, reducing variety and infantry combined arms. This is something to consider In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS penals informative poll10 Dec 2016, 13:18 PM [third poll option was supposed to be: giving other Soviet infantry precisely designated role and tools is an option] This is a purely informative poll created to let know how many players are for/against PTRSes for Penal Battalions. It is not connected to the balance mod team in any way. +PTRS gives a strategic decision, should penal battalions be upgraded and lose some of their anti-infantry power like panzergrenadiers or stay purely AI +Undoctrinal T1 light vehicle counter -PTRS conscripts now obsolete; conscripts overall obsolete -sliding away from penal battalions' initial design; penals now provide similar AT support as Guards, leading to role overlap like when penals with ppshes overlapped with shock troops Opinions welcome In: COH2 Balance