Profile of Ful4n0

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 345

General Information


Thread: Too much units lost... 11 Aug 2016, 13:20 PM pretty sure I lost more units than you xD, but in addition to what Danyek already pointed, I use control groups, and that help me with the unit preservation thing, as doble click over a control group, in example "1" and screen jump directly to the units in that group....so you can jump from one fight to another in no time... anyway, I think unit preservation is a matter of practice....the more games you play, the more sense you will have about wich of your units need more babysitting in a game....I mean, if in a side of the map you have a volks in cover in a long range fight againts a IS squad in cover, and at same time, you have other volks behing cover fighting an aproaching RIFLE squad trying to close the gap, then you know you need to keep an eye on this second volks squad becasue, once, the rifle squad is on short range you know your volks will start to die really fast.... That is kind of things I think when having more than one fight running at same time... Excuse my bad english, studying to improve it..... In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Raketenwerfer is awful5 Aug 2016, 14:20 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2016, 13:29 PMTiger Baron Just give it the raketens retreat, garrison, pupchen penetration, puchen arc of fire, fast reload cycle of the pupchen, and maybe even camo and problem will be solved. fixed for you. Not even talking about garrison capabilities of the pupchen... Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2016, 13:39 PMCartoonVillain Tbh I've never liked the raketen concept. It has so many gimmicks when all we need is a Pak40. So imo they should just replace it with the wehr Pak40 locked behind getting the first truck set up. I like this one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Advanced British Trench Facilities3 Aug 2016, 14:24 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2016, 13:35 PMullumulu Ah. My false. katitof is to dumb to get it what i want to say: Brits get anythink which was befor exclusive for other factions. Need more explain, Katitof? ok...here ...only for u: - can equip weapons from base to any infanterie: only USF....aaaaand now brits side tech??? wher and OKW don´t side tech to get weapons upgrades and they get them on field, not only after retreating to base and pick them up from raks, so I think both ways are balanced. - emplacements woth high dmg and hight HP: only OKW....aaaand now brits so same that brits one uses popcap.....oh wait, so only OKW has free-popcap emplacements with high dmg and high HP ---> NERF THEM, RIGHT NOW! - tanks with high hp, good gun, fast, very good accuracy, good AT and AI only whermacht (tiger) ...and now brits with comet ...(and later pershing to...sell sell sell...dollar dollar dollar) Are you trying to say that SOV and OKW should get one of them too??? more than half of the factions have one if we look at your opinion on this one - heavy armor flamer tank: only sovjet.....aaaaaand now brits If I´m not wrong OKW has one of those too, so, only USF and WHER don´t have one....GIVE THEM ONE!! RIGHT NOW!! If you want to deny katitof statements, you are going to try harder man, seeing how a noob without any balance knowledge as me can show how wrong your post is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry1 Jul 2016, 07:22 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jul 2016, 06:56 AMPencilBatRation Brits pay 35 muni while OKW and USF pay fuel and mp (the ambulance is overpriced as fuck as well). Also the inferior, unhealthy deutsch Untermensch need medics and healing as fast as possible and more than any other faction. yeah I know that, this game is full of differences as it is designed that way... UKF has to tech to get engineers and so, repairs.... USF and UKF has to pay fuel to unlock weapon racks and then have to pay muni for each weapon, while OKW only pay muni... Osther has t0 mg.. OKW has t0 atgun than can cloack, garrison and retreat and no other atgun can... USF can decrew their vehicles and repair them without engineers, SU has the only "offensive" mg in the game... and so on... that doesn´t mean game is imbalanced....problem? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry1 Jul 2016, 06:45 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jul 2016, 05:36 AMPencilBatRation I explained as why it is a problem now. 100 mp and 15 fuel is your explanation of why it is a problem now and it wasn´t a problem in the past?? so, paying for medics is the problem now???? lol, that is a problem all others factions have since the beggining (paying for healing). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: War Spoils Rating13 Jun 2016, 08:37 AM just want to ask, I hope it is OK to ask here.... I had around 900 items before the war spoils update, and yes, I had that map to farm, and I used a lot... thing is, that now, after update, I have only around 300 items (non-duplicates, that is fine) but I only got 500 supply..... shouldn´t I have quite more than 500 even if most of my dups items came from that farming map???? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Things that ruin team games, but don't affect 1v120 May 2016, 07:48 AM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2016, 16:19 PM0ld_Shatterhand This way he gets punished for too aggressive truck placement, but not to much because some commanders don´t make any sense without aggressive truck placement. Then use the rigth commander if you plan to use aggressive truck placement, same way a UKF player won´t use cancer commander if he don´t plan to build emplacements.... Commanders a strategic decision, and it would be nice if no one commander is usefull in every mach, every game mode, every map, every situation..... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Ostheer is currently not much fun in my opinion18 May 2016, 10:35 AM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2016, 19:57 PMwouren The single data point is the damage that the vehicles do against infantry. I don't know what would convey the point that it does damage against infantry more clearly. I possibly should've included more vehicles in my analysis, but at this point we're on a tangent to a tangent to a tangent (no, seriously) and I'm kind of losing interest. it is really easy to understand what that guy was telling you... I´ll give you an example.....my tank do 1000 damage every time he hits an enemy tank.... Enemy tank do 200 damage every time he hits my tank.... Now, enemy tank hit me 8 out of 10 shoots, while I only hit him 1 out of 10 shoots.... In addition, my tank fires each 5 seconds, but enemy tank shoot each 2 seconds... Yeah my tank is a beast, he do 1000 damage!!!! but after the engagement my tank is dead, and enemy tank is alive.... Jump back to quoted post16 May 2016, 19:48 PMwouren You might want to figure out what you are talking about before you post. The point I was making was that the damage is very high for the AEC against inf. Sorry if I sound salty. ehh, well, that guy said that AEC is not as good as it was in the past againts infantery, so no a great threat in the early game where he don´t usually have ligth vehicles and tanks, so no big treat there for the enemy faction. And you answered with that table....if your answers is remotely linked to what guy said, then, you were trying to defend AEC being good againts infantery If not, then, maybe, it is better you don´t quote others if you are not saying something related to the quoted guy. anyway, I´m really noob, so maybe, I just missunderstanding something, if so, apologies.... Finally, yeah, giving a table with damage data is not a good indicator of if that unit is good or bad againts infantery...coz, there are lot of others parameters that affect the performance of that unit againts infantery, as accuracy, how fast it is shoooting, etc... So , imho your damage table is really pointless as it is not a good indicator of the performance of those units againts infantery.... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Give US Snipers!17 May 2016, 13:27 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 11:48 AMMr.Smith The idea is that by using REs you will minimize your bleed. Thus, you will make a very expensive MP unit ineffective against your composition. Sure, you will never manage to kill the sniper; sure, the sniper will remain annoying. Sure, you might lose most confrontations because of that, but you will eventually win the war (because of lower MP bleed/better map control) -- and the enemy won't know if you also plan on fielding an m20 or not; that's the importance of having multiple options. Yes, weapon racks are an issue. However, what if we made REs only able to pick up one weapon instead of dual-weapons? Or what if we gave RE's inferior versions of the weapons they pick? please, don´t give USF snipers counters then, if your sniper counter proposal is stop using rifles, start using RE becasue they bleed less, nerf those RE (If in the past USF only could use rifles and RE, now one of them will be nerfed by removing one slot, so more rifles everywhere) and then, on top of that, teching to LT tier to field other sniper counter (m20).... A faction with only two stock infantery units, RE being the unit with less DPS out of the box of the game, the worse engineers of the whole game (you don´t need them to repair vehicles, so less utility, it is expesive to reinforce comparing with others engineers, you need to side tech to give them some figthing capabilities, no flamethrower upgrade, no mines...) I think, your are a great user with great suggestions, but this one wasn´t validated by your QA department, or you didn´t take enough time to give it a though before posting it.....becasue at the end, what you are saying is, there isn´t a USF counter to sniper other than the m20, but hey, you can stop fielding the best unit of the USF arsenal and start using RE, yeah, they don´t have any figthing power, and in the actual game, they are not even cheap to maintain, but you can use them coz they will bleed you less than rifles.... Yeah, in the past, RE were cheaper to reinforce, so you could replace any lost rifle with them, coz in late game, they are more cost-effective than rifles if you give them some upgrades from racks....Problem here being that you never replaced rifles with RE in the early game, only when a rifle was lost during the match....in the early game, YOU NEED RIFLES. Aren´t there other options that actually give to USF a proper sniper counter???? if not, then, buffing m20 or give USF a sniper unit is a better solution imho. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors17 May 2016, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2016, 15:42 PMSchmitz As already stated, Flak HQ can't barrage your at guns and kill the crew. It is also a lot more expensive and needed to build tanks. As already stated, you can place that truck in your base and no atgun will touch it. But you know, you will be able to produce same units from it that if you place covering a VP and/or a fuel point.... In: COH2 Balance