Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 17:35 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 17:17 PMthedarkarmadillo OKW didn't lose anything when the leg was buffed because it was always a part of their roster. Can you remind me where th mortar came from? There's a huge HUGE difference in having a unit buffed to fill its role and a unit added to add diversity Good point, and about OKW smoke and incendiary barrage coming from nowhere? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OBK buildings in disadvantage30 May 2018, 17:16 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 16:54 PMSander93 No I don't, I explicitly said that trucks deployed on the front lines are as vulnerable as they should be. This is high risk, high reward. There's nothing wrong with this. What I want is more durability added to the trucks the closer they are to the base sector, because I think it's unfair when the OKW player deliberately decides to build the trucks close to base (or in base) for safety they can still get destroyed in one or two arty barrages. This is high risk, low reward which doesn't make sense. And less durability the farest they are. That's a interesting proposal, what would be the malus for a truck deployed close to a VP which are usualy at the middle of the map? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 17:10 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 14:52 PMzarok47 Some posts back I already said okw flamenade can be changed to flamers on pio's or maybe only be thrown on garrisons, so I agree it is a problem atm (and not just vs UKF). I would also say UKF is, was and always will be a shitshow to balance so I would focus on the other 4 factions. Allright , thanks for "missing out" on all the reasons rushing stuka is suicide in 1vs1. I also expect your thread about why USF can lose acces to mortar today, since it's cheaper to get pack howi then it is to get stuka (I already prepared your post for that). Or is your 1200 games as USF 1vs1 vs 3 okw games a sign of factional bias projected unto me? Your call buddy. Yep you are bias, I already opened such a topic where I stated USF mortar didn't bring shit (while I assume I posted it before the last patch), then I always prefered riflesmoke to the mortar as the mortar doesn't counter multiple hmgs. Please also note that while USF gain a mortar they lost those smoke from riflemen. What OKW did lost when the ISG gained garrison cleaning tools again? Then since you don't read the topic, I already gave my opinion on the solution I feel more viable: Move the flamnade to SP or put it behind a paywall. What you picked-up from my comment was about someone complaining that IF the flamnade was to be removed (not my proposal) then it would lock OKW T2 out of any heavily garrisoned map because there is NO garrison cleaner in that tier. To which I replied there is actually the best garrison cleaner in the game in that tier. Too bad it cost fuel but still, maybe in 1vs1 that's usually not your first call, that's a complete different story in teamgame. Then you came and blablabla... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 11:29 AMzarok47 Which I rebutted in the post you claim was nitpicking. Are you trolling or just enjoy digging your own hole? Nop, OKW T2 is dominant on every map that is not garrison heavy and it has one of the best garrison counter in its T2 but yeah it cost fuel... too bad. At some point you may consider that every factional tier has CONS and PRO and maybe OKW T2 CONS is lack of cheap and easy to access garrison cleaner. You may need to go over your factional bias to understand that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 11:25 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 11:18 AMzarok47 Take your own advice and read all posts. Which is not true. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 10:58 AMzarok47 That could work, but I prefer flamethrower since that seems to work on engi/pio's. Why try to re-invent the wheel? Things like this make me wonder how your 1vs1 experience is (especially as okw). LV's, more than medium tanks rule the scene, delaying either to get arty to flush out garrisons is retarded. While you struggle vs every garrison and hold on to dear life getting that stuka out, I am getting out a LV which will rape your army. It's why every half decent faction has acces to garrison counters from early one (flames, mortar) while brits struggle to do anything (and are seriously weak atm since their crutches are gone). At this point I am seriously wondering you're just against okw getting garrison clearing for the simple fact it's okw. Else I expect your thread on why USF should lose the mortar today (afterall, they can rush pack howi for cheaper than okw can rush stuka). Then build T1. Or read all posts and stop only cherry picking quotes out of context. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW starting unit change30 May 2018, 09:00 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 08:37 AMinsaneHoshi IIRC all factions start with the same MP - their starting units cost. Nop that's a lie. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 07:28 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 07:18 AMShadowLinkX37 Because in 1v1 the first piece of armor matters a lot. A stuka doesn't do anything vs armor. What matters in 1vs1 is the wiping potential of your army and capping territory: Armor doesn't cap points. You have racketen and Puma to counter medium armor as well. Know with what you say, you completely make me believe flamnade have to go away, so OKW meta can evolve to something else than spam volks>fast pz4. with a variant including a HT or Luch if things go very well and you have extra fuel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 07:13 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 06:34 AMShadowLinkX37 Because building a stuka in 1v1 first vehicle is SO viable. Honestly if people think building a vehicle to counter garrisons is an appropriate counter for an entire tech decision people need to stop bleeding bias from every wound. Why not? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?30 May 2018, 06:22 AM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2018, 06:18 AMthedarkarmadillo Ugh you expect me to use another unit besides volks to kill infantry, clear garrisons, build cover, snare tanks and eventually ball into a death blob? That's not why we're here. Yes, but I'm waiting for the fuel argument so you can't rush T3 and spam Pz4 fast enough... In: COH2 Balance