The tiger is a different tank in a different faction with a different economy. It's not 1=1 balance. The tiger has no capacity for Jackson support not dual BAR support. The tiger doesn't have self healing armour to support it. The Pershing doesn't fact allied TDs.
They are both heavy tank that can be called at cp12 with almost identical cost. Player expects the same role from it. Absorb dmg & deal dmg at the frontline.
Pershing doesn't have support from pak40(with weak target skill), stock rocket arty unit, mg42 (the best mg). So USF needs to break the line OST draw. And luck for Tiger, it doesn't face the Panther! WOW!
The Pershing loses in a slugging match with the tiger because it's SUPPOSED TO.
And in the end What the tiger is and can do is frankly irrelevant.
What matters is that the Pershing is balanced in its own faction for its own cost.
Usf tanks are specifically not intended to outlast enemy armour. The entire faction is built around this concept.
USF tanks are specifically not intended to outlast enemy armour but move faster & deals more dmg. Wouldn't Pershing firing faster than Tiger with less range(45vs50) more suits?
The Pershing is basicly a Panther with AI. Not a tiger of any strain.
I'm paying 630mp + 230 fuel for Panther with AI.
You cannot ignore the power spike that CA brings when balancing the Pershing.
I already tested power spike of CA to Pershing is weaker than vet3 Tiger.
I'd rather have passive CA than power spike. Thank you.