M10 is one of the unit that shows "I still can win you even with this unit".
I honestly don't know why m10 is added to UKF commander...
At least buff hp to 640 just like other tanks? |
I always get surprised when axis player complain about "high armored" tanks like churchill(240), kv-8(260)kv-1(270) when the comparison is one of the highest armored(260 -> 312) tank.
From my experience(including game play & pro players replay) brummbar has very high potential with ground attack. It's not uncommon thing to see brummbar toggling "hold fire" & do manual attack only. It deals tons of dmg per each shot. No wipe with one shot to the full health inf., but good enough to send them back to the base.
Allies have to spot the opportunity to flank it to catch the back. But it's not that easy. Especially when 2at + brum is common combination.
I'd say nerfing mobillity or a AOE or reduce armor(312 is.... ridiculous. Even 6 pounder has only 60% chance at long range) a little will do. IMO a bit overpowered in current status. |
Just give up your hope. UKF is the only faction having WR of around 43% WR in 1v1( https://coh2stats.com/stats/month/1617235200/1v1/wermacht?statsSource=top200), yet they don't even want to face the fact that UKF is week.
Not showing on pro level play like ML is because pros tend to like other factions, Having low WR in automatch is because UKF players tend to have low skills.
With current balance, I can safely say removing UKF from the game will surely gonna boost WR of soviet & USF in team games. Somewhat buff for the allies. |
Thread: RK 43 7 May 2021, 15:31 PM
It has slightly lower penetration at both vet0 and vet3 that does not matter when facing stock Allied tanks (except for Churchill and Comet).
I think it's time for the people to realize that Churchill only has 240 armor.
vet 0 rak43 can pen with 75%
vet 3 : 93.75%
Please don't make people think Churchill is the tough one. They tank with hp, not armor. |
Thread: RK 43 7 May 2021, 02:56 AM
Meant to write 160+, my bad.
Fact is that OKW doesn't have AT squads that can be a deterrent to light vehicles like re double zook, Panzergrens or RE, but Raketenwerfer is the worst at guns against light vehicles, while being more or less in line with others against mediums and heavies, is another leftover of bad faction design.
What happened to Panzerfüsiliers? It does't count because its commander only unit? |
Thread: RK 43 6 May 2021, 16:11 PM
What if 2 Okw vs 2 Brit and early game Okw facing 4 UCarrier?
Just go for 1 raket per each player. Brit will leave as soon as 4 UC dies. |
Thread: RK 43 6 May 2021, 10:00 AM
Joke a side, in VN.Community, Alies ATG are born for killing Alies tank rather than Axis. If Enemies picked 57mm, 7 prounder or Zis, you are fucked for sure.
After all, Armor values matter.
XD. Guess that meme is world-wide. rooted weapon works best to the original faction.
57 to USF / pak 40 to WM(thx to it's high pen) |
Thread: RK 43 5 May 2021, 13:33 PM
TBH, I'm quite surprised anyone thinking 57 is the best AT gun. Thought (at least in Kor. community) we all agreed on the pak 40 is the best one. |
Thread: RK 43 5 May 2021, 01:48 AM
The Pak40 has the same penetration of the Pounder and about the same as the Zis
With incredible skill that stuns enemy tank. And don't forget that almost all (except for some heavy tank from Soviet) allies tank armor is lower than axis. Even churchil(240) has only 6 higher than p4(234).
You don't need to spend munitions with anything but heavy tanks to use hvap.
As I've mentioned earlier, 57 only has 55% chance of penetrating even p4. 45% to panther. I don't know about you, but I'd not be happy with 55% chance of dealing dmg. with AT. |
This is bad comparison tbh. Doctines dont, in a global scale, break faction rules, they allow different playstyle with-in the faction rules. .
I simply don't get it. One is allowing different playstyle within the faction rule, and one is "breaking the faction rule"?
Can you elaborate more?
And if possible, provide me what is the faction rule(for each faction) here?
USF must have low armor? UKF mainline inf. must not have snare? |