Profile of ElSlayer

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198020912674


Thread: Buff Wehrmacht30 Jun 2016, 16:11 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2016, 16:03 PMRedT3rror Let's play a game: Find the allied fanboy thread: image removed "Welcome to the COH2 Balance forum"? Wait, it is Ami's thread? Nevermind. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry30 Jun 2016, 14:32 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2016, 14:25 PMZyllen Didn't i already told we are offtopic and i no longer wish to discuss this any more? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction satisfaction poll30 Jun 2016, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2016, 05:46 AMDoomlord52 > OKW: Feels lackluster somehow. This, exactly. [...] Main issues: Builders are actually combat units (and really good ones at that) No real early-game support crews (MG, mortar) - at least before this patch Far too much reliance on mid-game LIGHT vehicles Can't really play defensive when needed Why don't you just play Wehrmacht then? Because that's what you describe. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry30 Jun 2016, 10:46 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2016, 09:54 AMMoLarr Yes SU the same as OKW, except for the part where SU has alot more varied options. The blob needed to go I agree with that. The result though instead of having the ugly blob meta, and the light vehicle rush you are now left with the one choice. You can honestly not be a fan of luchs or puma rush everytime? Except for the part where 50% of units in Soviet T1+T2 are just included in OKW T0 and OKW have more so called "Elite infantry" types that Soviets. Talk about variety. It's not like all infantry play is instantly removed once light vehicle hits the field. And by the way, how luchs/puma rush is different from rushing Stuart/AEC/T-70/222/M20 everytime? I think you're trying to oversimplify current OKW meta. IMO new OKW meta is combined arms, just like Soviets (as you already said in the beginning). Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2016, 09:30 AMOZtheWiZARD [...] This topic should have been named: I struggle to find my ways without my trusted Volks blob, rant. I'd say " I struggle to find my ways without my trusted Volks blob and stalling into KT without light vehicle play" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Replace the Jeep with Pershing.29 Jun 2016, 18:15 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 17:41 PMBreaking Brad the doge just needs to not cost fuel In: Lobby
Thread: Any reason for it?29 Jun 2016, 17:37 PM Ah, some more cross-faction unit comparison out of faction context. On topic: How T-34-76 struggles with MOST medium armor but Pz.IV struggles with ALL? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch today? Scheduled maintenance today29 Jun 2016, 16:30 PM New bugs! Yay! In: Lobby
Thread: Replace the Jeep with Pershing.29 Jun 2016, 16:29 PM I'm not sure if I support this change. WC51 outside of Mechanized Company isn't THAT attractible since giving OKW snares. Previously you could roam around even after first schrek appeared on the battlefield. You could just evade it, or even play safe and use WC51 only after you forced schrek squad retreat with your infantry. Now after building first tech building ALL Volks get snares so your WC51 is useful only in a very short timeframe. Without Withdraw and Refit it is quite costly investment (20 fuel!) for what it does - glorified kubel with transport capability. In: Lobby
Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)29 Jun 2016, 16:11 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 12:41 PMJunaid You mean pop-cap exploit. You're defending it? You didn't understood how it affected number of tanks. I explained. Why do you think that I defending it? I don't even care about its existance. I never use it, except maybe when I want to keep M20 on my base in case if I urgently need mines, but don't need M20 itself. Happens 1 in 20 games because I suck at unit preservation. In: Lobby
Thread: StrumPio Med Kits: A Proposal 29 Jun 2016, 15:41 PM Damn, SPios are indeed overburdened with roles nowadays. In: COH2 Gameplay