Profile of donofsandiego

Lol good for u, u were welcome to stop quoting me at anytime

It takes two to tango. But yeah, that's about it.

Lol and u were doing what exactly? Balance patches are over anyway...

Same thing as you, except I was already convinced what, 7 posts prior to this one now?

They are used mostly the same now. Since demos can be spotted by anyone, they are pretty much restricted to blowing up buildings and bunkers. Most other cases its a waste of muni

But still, you can admit that the use cases are not 100% the same.

Of all the differences between the factions this one might literally be the least important

I don't mind that at all.

Anyways, you realize you can safely exit thread now? I'm already fine with ost not getting demos. At this point you're just here to argue for argument's sake

U literally said that u wanted demos on Ost becuz "u like them". Thats a good reason but the one im giving isnt? Seriously?

No, that's not my only reason. I also dislike it because I think it's very useful in many situations, and thought that it had ought to be available to both sides because of this reason. As it turns out, it would be bad for the balance if the axis had the ability to destroy shot blockers and such early game. So therefore I changed my mind.

Only thing i was trying to convince u of is that just becuz u like or dislike something, u need a better reason than that to make a change...

I would have told you why specifically I thought that they should have them, but you asked if "they need[ed] them?" which is a whole other discussion entirely, and it had nothing to do with why I was wondering about giving it to them anyways.

I gave u my argument and u ignored it. LIke i said, sure lets give Ost demos. But y stop there? U still havent answered that

Y not give soviets bunkers, anti-personell minefields, and a dedicated AT mine?

I hate to burst your bubble man... but they actually do have access to all of those things. So I don't know what you're trying to prove here. Actually, even besides that, I don't know what point you're trying to prove here. The thread is already over. I got my answer.

Cuz if they dont need them y change it??? UR reason could not be more silly:

Bro. You are all over the place. Pick your excuse and stick to it at least. Either necessity doesn't matter or it matters.

You start off posting "do they need them?" and then you switch to an argument about "bro it's just game design" and then you get angry at me for pointing that out.

But y stop at demos.... I like teller mines too. I also like having stock rocket arty. I also like having free AA when i play OKW


Of course they arent, but i dont think relic was changing design just cuz they liked too... IT was for balance reasons

The idea is that you take something away, but you give it back in another way. Which relic kind of failed at lmao (obviously not just in this regard). Sure, OST can open up new paths and destroy buildings with the satchel, but they don't have huge anti-blob potential without the demo.

Simple question, is demos being only available stock to soviet CEs a balance issue?

Are we switching back to the necessity argument now? Yes, I guess it is, considering what theekvn said.