???
Again, you described the Ostwind. A vehicle which trumps all lights, serves as AI and can still do chip damage against mediums.
???????
Did you read my OP? The whole point was giving OST an earlier trump card to light vehicles and light tanks. They do not have one right now, and must overinvest in AT when they're already losing the infantry battle barring excellent MG play.
If you think OST does well enough against light vehicles and light tanks then okay, please state so. I don't think many players will agree, but I can always be wrong.
I don't think OST has a good option vs light tanks, and my whole point is fixing that. The Puma from mobile defense used to make OST competitive, but the tech and building requirement changes have made that strategy obsolete.
Allied players will never regret building a t-70, AEC, or stuart against OST. There's no punish beyond overextending those vehicles against anemic AT options.
If you think I'm "describing the ostwind" then okay. Throw away the whole short-barreled p4 idea.
Is moving the ostwind to t2, or the HQ with a battlephase 2 requirement a decent idea? Why or why not?