this feels like a troll thread... soviet tanks arent crap... although i feel ram should be a better ability
Soviet quality was crap in real life.
in what sense? the T-34 mod 41 had superior armor and gun to the panzer 4F...it was also a significantly faster tank with better cross country mobility...
the T-34 mod 43 had superior armor to the Panzer 4 F2-G while sporting a gun good enough to penetrate the 50mm of armor the panzer 4 F2-G sported.... and of course its also faster
the T-34-85 outclasses the Panzer 4 H-J outright in all aspects except ergonomics...
if youre comparing on the standards of optics and ergonomics then thats the tradeoff for being all that and having a pricetag less than half of that of a sherman...
and if we talk about soviet heavies well the IS-2 mod 44 is lighter than tiger but sports a bigger gun capable of knocking out all fielded german heavies... and armor resistant to the KwK 43 up to 1km... did i mention that its faster aswell?
Still they managed to lose more soldiers despite having every conceivable advantage.
not quite... the soviets took heavy losses in order to accomplish deep battle... but managed to successfully disable/capture far more german soldiers than the numbers present...
also by late 1944/45 the red army had less losses per engagement than the wehrmacht took... check out the vistula oder offensive...