Login

russian armor

Brummbar too potent against mediums

rqd
28 Sep 2019, 03:32 AM
#1
avatar of rqd

Posts: 65

It is strange that a non-doc heavy tank which excels at killing infantry has better penertration stats than a t-34-76. Is it intended? I mean, doctrinal 105 Sherman has only 35 pen.
28 Sep 2019, 04:52 AM
#2
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2019, 03:32 AMrqd
It is strange that a non-doc heavy tank which excels at killing infantry has better penertration stats than a t-34-76. Is it intended? I mean, doctrinal 105 Sherman has only 35 pen.


Eh they'll probably give it an armor and damage buff next patch or move to T2 so it's "more available" because Axis crap always has to be "more available".
28 Sep 2019, 05:06 AM
#3
avatar of Doomlord52

Posts: 960

Yes, it does have higher pen than a T34/76 (+20 at all ranges), but its' projectile is also incredibly slow moving; the chances of a direct hit vs. a moving vehicle is very low (unless using attack-ground, but then it's a skill-shot). I can't really think of a situation in which the higher pen would make it over-performing?

As for the 105-sherman having low pen; I'm really not sure why it's that low. Possibly because it has a turret and higher RoF?
28 Sep 2019, 08:13 AM
#4
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2019, 03:32 AMrqd
It is strange that a non-doc heavy tank which excels at killing infantry has better penertration stats than a t-34-76. Is it intended? I mean, doctrinal 105 Sherman has only 35 pen.

Both The 105 and the brumbar has deflection damage so they always do damage.

On the other hand the Dozer upgrade Shermans have have switchable munition having both AT and great AI.
28 Sep 2019, 08:29 AM
#5
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13


As for the 105-sherman having low pen; I'm really not sure why it's that low. Possibly because it has a turret and higher RoF?


Because of deflection damage as mentioned and the Brummbar is all about raw power given it lacks a turret with less utility abilities like the smoke. Its gun is supposed to be better than the 105mm in most aspects.
28 Sep 2019, 08:40 AM
#6
avatar of GI John 412

Posts: 495 | Subs: 1



Because of deflection damage as mentioned and the Brummbar is all about raw power given it lacks a turret with less utility abilities like the smoke. Its gun is supposed to be better than the 105mm in most aspects.


Except freedom.

The Brunmbar has only 50% as much Freedom as a 105mm Sherman.

However this does put its Freedom at about the same as a T34/76 and about 75% higher than Ostruppen.
rqd
28 Sep 2019, 09:21 AM
#7
avatar of rqd

Posts: 65

I can't really think of a situation in which the higher pen would make it over-performing?


Like in close combat? Usually mediums will try to attack brummbar's rear so if they get close even the slow projectile will have good chance to hit. So if two tanks are both low on health a penertrate shot could change the result...idk.
28 Sep 2019, 09:51 AM
#8
avatar of Jilet

Posts: 556

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2019, 09:21 AMrqd


Like in close combat? Usually mediums will try to attack brummbar's rear so if they get close even the slow projectile will have good chance to hit. So if two tanks are both low on health a penertrate shot could change the result...idk.


Getting hit from a assault gun without a turret on its rear. Hmmmm...
28 Sep 2019, 12:29 PM
#9
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned
Purely a L2P issue. Just keep your medium tank in motion and Brum won't hit anything. Thread closed.
28 Sep 2019, 16:01 PM
#10
avatar of frostbite

Posts: 593

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2019, 03:32 AMrqd
It is strange that a non-doc heavy tank which excels at killing infantry has better penertration stats than a t-34-76. Is it intended? I mean, doctrinal 105 Sherman has only 35 pen.

its to potent period

28 Sep 2019, 16:02 PM
#11
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

It’s not period
28 Sep 2019, 16:10 PM
#12
avatar of frostbite

Posts: 593

mini isu 152 non doctrinal. ultimate manpower killer. bangs atguns all inf. shoots over shit easily. squad wipes and makes units have to retreat within seconds of encounter and still penetrates most allies tank like butter. and trying to dodge those shots are laughable unless your reversing already far. its to potent
28 Sep 2019, 16:13 PM
#13
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

mini isu 152 non doctrinal. ultimate manpower killer. bangs atguns all inf. shoots over shit easily. squad wipes and makes units have to retreat within seconds of encounter and still penetrates most allies tank like butter. and trying to dodge those shots are laughable unless your reversing already far. its to potent


Wot
28 Sep 2019, 16:28 PM
#14
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474



Wot
u are trying to argue with someone that defended pre nerf brace , u rember permanent brace ? He defended that
28 Sep 2019, 16:56 PM
#15
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

u are trying to argue with someone that defended pre nerf brace , u rember permanent brace ? He defended that


I don't. Pretty sure brace was never permanent. It's cooldown used to be way too fast but when was it permanent?
28 Sep 2019, 17:30 PM
#16
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474



I don't. Pretty sure brace was never permanent. It's cooldown used to be way too fast but when was it permanent?
5 sec cd bwtween brace
28 Sep 2019, 18:03 PM
#17
avatar of Sir Edgelord

Posts: 127

u are trying to argue with someone that defended pre nerf brace , u rember permanent brace ? He defended that

I also don't remember or just don't know the translation as I am in Russian, what Brace are we about?
28 Sep 2019, 22:02 PM
#18
avatar of Hannibal
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2

u are trying to argue with someone that defended pre nerf brace , u rember permanent brace ? He defended that



I also don't remember or just don't know the translation as I am in Russian, what Brace are we about?


Don't derail guys. This has nothing to do with the topic in the slightest. But he means the UKF emplacement abiliity (green shield icon, weapons disabled for damage reduction)


To the subject:
I don't get why the Brummbär should have decent penetration. It's worth its price in AI capability, so why should it also have the chance to deal decent damage against mediums while it already has (according to someone posting earlier) deflection damage? This does not make a lot of sense.
Against lights, sure, but a medium should not be threatened to be damaged by normal shots.
However, I'd argue for high penetration for the bunker busting barrage because the Brummbär here behaves more like the AVRE/Sturmtiger.
rqd
29 Sep 2019, 00:34 AM
#19
avatar of rqd

Posts: 65

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2019, 09:51 AMJilet


Getting hit from a assault gun without a turret on its rear. Hmmmm...


Your opponent will always rotate and reverse brummbar while being flanked, so yeah...
29 Sep 2019, 02:54 AM
#20
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

5 sec cd bwtween brace


You mean 15. The first change it got was moving it from 15 to 90
4 users are browsing this thread: 4 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

365 users are online: 365 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50144
Welcome our newest member, jacobowr92
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM