Is2 and other heavy tanks issu
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
After that there can be some minor buffs for specific tanks. KT should get better turret traverse and/or front armor, Tiger should get +5 range, IS-2 perhaps a bit more damage. Pershing will need an HP buff if it's godly wiping power is nerfed.
This way all heavy tanks would have standardized reliable offensive power while retaining some specific traits, such as the KT being slow but heavily armored, the Pershing being an overgrown medium and the Tiger and IS-2 being good all-rounders.
Posts: 130
Posts: 3260
Posts: 955
So, what about pershing With 800hp only
Thats off-set by having the heaviest cannon. Heaviest, like the most accurate and wiping one.
Unfortunately, its on a faction that is already filled with good DPS but low survival-ability stuff
USF could realy use a churchill clone
Posts: 4474
they are not worth it just spam nomal tanks or tank desroyer only isu,ele,jagt are usefull heavy tanks and maybe the pershing as u can use it as a more powerfull jackson but u could just build 2 jackson instead so your choice
just spam art with a mix of generalist/atgun infantry/TD
Posts: 5279
Posts: 2358
Or... If you are playing a team game maybe it's because you just want to have fun and use whatever the fuck you want to.
Isn't the last tournament being played as a 2v2 Team match?
Anyway if you dont care about 3v3 or 4v4 neither you dont need to be that rude. The game has those modes for a reason...
Posts: 5279
Isn't the last tournament being played as a 2v2 Team match?
Anyway if you dont care about 3v3 or 4v4 neither you dont need to be that rude. The game has those modes for a reason...
I mostly play 3s and 4s because I can play with more friends that way. I don't mean it as a disrespect to the mode, but the mode will never be balanced and accepting that and just playing what's fun
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I quited using the IS2 like a year ago when I saw a P4 penetrate it frontaly 3 times one after another. Experience has led me to believe the claims that it has the same armor as the KT are false and its actually closer to a Tiger I or its someway nulified by the high penetration of german TDs. ....
One video a thousand words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_K7HJuNJ40
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
One video a thousand words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_K7HJuNJ40
I do not know when I play with the IS-2 ricochet that is rare + the low productivity of the main gun makes this tank useless for me.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I do not know when I play with the IS-2 ricochet that is rare + the low productivity of the main gun makes this tank useless for me.
Chance to bounce vs IS-2 at max range:
more shots will bounce than not.
armored_car_sdkfz_234_squad_mp 79%
panzer_iv_ausf_j_battle_group_mp 71%
jagdpanzer_tank_d170estroyer_squad_mp 55%
stug_iii_squad_mp 55%
raketenwerfer43_88mm_puppchen_antitank_gun_squad_mp 52%
More shots will penetrate than bounce.
pak40_75mm_at_gun_squad_mp 49%
king_tiger_squad_mp 47%
tiger_squad_mp 47%
panther_ausf_g_squad_mp 41%
Posts: 91
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Soviets are my favourite faction, and I do not think IS-2 is bad. I tested it in some CheatMode duels "Tiger vs IS-2" and it's about 50/50 win for each, maybe slightly even favouring IS-2. IS-2 can hit infantry really hard (well, if it doesn't miss), and has good armor. The only thing I would change about IS-2 is the doctrines where it's available. Maybe take IS-2 from that doctrine with t34/85 and IL-2 and put it somewhere else.
From a commander design point of view a powerful call-in like the IS-2 and a powerful off map like Il-2 should not be available in the same commander.
Same goes for things like Tiger and stuka AT or Elephant and stuka dive bomb.
IS-2 and T-34/85 are a rather poor combination mainly because one will probably lack the fuel to build both unless in 4vs4.
Posts: 91
From a commander design point of view a powerful call-in like the IS-2 and a powerful off map like Il-2 should not be available in the same commander.
Same goes for things like Tiger and stuka AT or Elephant and stuka dive bomb.
IS-2 and T-34/85 are a rather poor combination mainly because one will probably lack the fuel to build both unless in 4vs4.
Yeah, having both t34/85s and IS-2 requires great amounts of fuel, and lots of engineers.
Livestreams
5 | |||||
4 | |||||
596 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.1109614.644+10
- 4.606220.734-1
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, jhonnycena0400
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM