Posts: 393
Posts: 673
Posts: 500
Posts: 1740
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1216
i honestly dont understand why you would introduce a new unit to the game, blatantly underpowered, and keep ignoring itCalled money, mate.
why
Posts: 1217
Posts: 393
Called money, mate.
Posts: 149 | Subs: 1
Posts: 207
Posts: 593
Relic recently tries to make some underperforming units more usefull (SU85/T34/Penals/Brumbar...)sad but flame ht is better then both kv8 and flame hetzer
But there are still allot of underperforming units like WC51/Greyhound etc.
But this thread is about the Flame Hetzer, I tried to make it work but to me it looks like this units spews luke warm water instead of actual flames. And would like to know what you think of this unit and if underperforming how you would buff it.
Edit:
Veterancy requirements also is way too high, it takes more than 150 conscript kills to reach its maximum veterancy.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 295 | Subs: 1
2 
Posts: 1108
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 393
just decrease the veterancy requirements. How much CP do you need to call-in?
Posts: 1216
Release new shitty unit to draw in the suckers; fix it later to draw in the people who sat on the fence. Profit for everyone...except the suckers.
Would make more sense to make it OP then like other released commanders..
Posts: 96
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Plan of saving Feuersturm doctrine:
1. Flamehetzer ----------------> Trash can .... Profit!
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
It should get more frontal armor. The excellent slope gave it almost the protection of a Panthers frontal armor.
That or make the Flammpanzer an upgrade for a regular Hetzer that could take its spot.
Posts: 194
 |
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
327 | ||
 |
|
|
226 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
