Please add the Panzer III and T-26 tanks to the game, they played a vital role in the Eastern Front when Germany first attacked Russia.
Lots of players would love to see these in the game.
They would be good for early tank battles and support.
Panzer III and T-26 Tanks
26 Apr 2016, 06:30 AM
#1
Posts: 49
26 Apr 2016, 06:36 AM
#2
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
First: the Soviet Union have Т-70, to T-26 no role
secondly: PZ-3 is appropriate to compare with the T-50
thirdly: I would prefer the T-60 with 20-mm cannon
secondly: PZ-3 is appropriate to compare with the T-50
thirdly: I would prefer the T-60 with 20-mm cannon
26 Apr 2016, 06:48 AM
#3
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
They played that role in 1941.
MP happens in 1944-45.
They were outclassed, outdated and re-purposed by that time.
MP happens in 1944-45.
They were outclassed, outdated and re-purposed by that time.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
26 Apr 2016, 06:50 AM
#4
Posts: 673
They played that role in 1941.
MP happens in 1944-45.
We can also say that about T-34-76. Played role in 41-43, after that was totally changed to 85.
But... in CoH 2 it looks like in late war 76 was main soviet tank.
26 Apr 2016, 07:00 AM
#5
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Numbers wise? Hell it was.
It was most common sight on the battlefield until the very end, there was a fair share of 85s, but 76s served from the beginning until the end.
"Quantity is a quality on its own" as he once said.
It was most common sight on the battlefield until the very end, there was a fair share of 85s, but 76s served from the beginning until the end.
"Quantity is a quality on its own" as he once said.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
26 Apr 2016, 07:58 AM
#7
Posts: 556
gross hotchkiss
26 Apr 2016, 08:00 AM
#8
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Who the hell subscribed to my posts? Why would you subject yourself to this? I know you are reading this. Are you one of the masochists subscribed to Katitof?
These people work in mysterious ways.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
26 Apr 2016, 08:02 AM
#9
Posts: 556
i really don't think you understand how common the sight of the t34-76 was....sure it was garbage but boy it was cheap garbage to produce.
26 Apr 2016, 11:17 AM
#10
Posts: 1617
Panzer 3 
Maybe as a flame tank
Maybe as a flame tank
26 Apr 2016, 20:12 PM
#11
Posts: 609
#TeamHotchkiss
26 Apr 2016, 21:27 PM
#12
Posts: 49
First: the Soviet Union have Т-70, to T-26 no role
secondly: PZ-3 is appropriate to compare with the T-50
thirdly: I would prefer the T-60 with 20-mm cannon
So? Plenty of good WWII games have similar units. Also their stats, build time and abilities would be different making them distinct choices to make.
You sound like those people that were against new units or the Pershing tank. But guess what? they have been added to the game and players are using them.
26 Apr 2016, 22:19 PM
#13
Posts: 25
So? Plenty of good WWII games have similar units. Also their stats, build time and abilities would be different making them distinct choices to make.
You sound like those people that were against new units or the Pershing tank. But guess what? they have been added to the game and players are using them.
Except logically having the soviets field a woefully outdated tank makes little sense, and if it was a sensible suggestion, what role would it have? AI or AT? And besides the Light tank category for the soviets is covered by the T-70 so logically the T-26 can not fill a role that the soviets don't already have and is a waste of MP and fuel.
The Panzer III has always been suggested.
26 Apr 2016, 22:41 PM
#14
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
PzIII Flame Tank is a good shout, and frankly I think putting that kit on the Hetzer was a missed opportunity.
26 Apr 2016, 23:37 PM
#15
Posts: 455
I could see the Panzer III series to have a role in the game as a light tank since it would be more armored than a Stuart.
So? Plenty of good WWII games have similar units. Also their stats, build time and abilities would be different making them distinct choices to make.
You sound like those people that were against new units or the Pershing tank. But guess what? they have been added to the game and players are using them.
However, the T-26 just wouldn't be suitable. Not only is it really inferior to the Panzer III, but it is a slow tank with an armor of a M20 Utility Car. It's not really an ideal light tank for the Soviets to use. Besides, the T-70 already fulfills that role of harassment.
26 Apr 2016, 23:42 PM
#16
Posts: 196
Would P3s be cool and historical? Yes. Do they have a place in the game? No.
Seriously, where could P3s be added that didn't make them either game-breaking (pre-T3) or useless (T3)?
Seriously, where could P3s be added that didn't make them either game-breaking (pre-T3) or useless (T3)?
 | Playercard of Kallie | |||||||||||||||||||
|
27 Apr 2016, 00:35 AM
#17
Posts: 266
Would P3s be cool and historical? Yes. Do they have a place in the game? No.
Seriously, where could P3s be added that didn't make them either game-breaking (pre-T3) or useless (T3)?
6 cp call in.
27 Apr 2016, 00:47 AM
#18
Posts: 196
6 cp call in.
6 cp = useless. You can have a P4 out at 6 cp, if you want. And at that stage,anything weaker than a P4 is fodder for AT.
| Playercard of Kallie | |||||||||||||||||||
|
27 Apr 2016, 04:25 AM
#19
Posts: 2742
i really don't think you understand how common the sight of the t34-76 was....sure it was garbage but boy it was cheap garbage to produce.
That was the Sherman.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
27 Apr 2016, 05:31 AM
#20
Posts: 1216
I suppose you can make it cost like the StuG but perform as bad as Puma.
But then again good luck Relic bothering.
But then again good luck Relic bothering.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
86 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
153 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
996 users are online:
996 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM