Posts: 366
My opinion:
Heavies should be tough when they are properly facing their enemy and are engaged in a slug-fest. They should however, be vulnerable to mediums flanking around and getting rear shots as mediums are risking more by diving in and trying to circle around a heavy tank which leaves them open to snares and rear-line AT.
Posts: 161
Russian guns penetrating Kruppsteel! Witchcraft!
1 
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Posts: 304
Posts: 1217
Posts: 304
Posts: 526
Posts: 236
Posts: 36
Posts: 1072
Posts: 141
some good ideas but many absurd. i dont want this balance update, pls relic do your own work!.What are you talking about ninja changes, do you even know what those are...
# NO MORE NINJA CHANGES!!!
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 141
Personally, I'm a fan of them reducing the Rear armor on heavies one of my biggest gripes with heavies is that bad RNG can really wreck you (especially a mass T34/Sherman dive versus a Tiger or KT).+1
Posts: 738
Posts: 400
Besides, I'm pretty sure IRL rear armor was pretty weak and couldn't take much if any punishment.
Posts: 1122
4 Posts: 141
Heavies seem very unattractive now, especially first tiger.
Posts: 139
Heavies seem very unattractive now, especially first tiger.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Agreed. No use of getting a KT now since they didn't buff its frontal armor/side armor. Slow turret will make it so easy for 76, 85, Cromwell, etc spam to own it now. No shrek to protect it either unless you turtle a place with toy rockets around it. 2 panthers or 3 JPIV are a better choice.
4 Posts: 141
Agreed. No use of getting a KT now since they didn't buff its frontal armor/side armor. Slow turret will make it so easy for 76, 85, Cromwell, etc spam to own it now. No shrek to protect it either unless you turtle a place with toy rockets around it. 2 panthers or 3 JPIV are a better choice.
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
227 | ||
 |
|
|
84 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
