You know whats funny?
Only the tiger got nerfs...Is-2 is fine. WTF?!
No allied bias, sure
Don't look at me. I nerfed the rear armour of all heavies
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
You know whats funny?
Only the tiger got nerfs...Is-2 is fine. WTF?!
No allied bias, sure
Posts: 1617
Don't look at me. I nerfed the rear armour of all heavies
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Posts: 824
We are all freaking out about no handheld AT. An entire faction depends on no handheld AT in stock (Soviet army), another has no native snares on infantry and its AT is useless against light armor (Brits). We are going to test these changes, doesn't mean they are 100% definitely going to be how the game ends up in the future.
OKW shreks were always a problem because they vetted volks up too quickly and they offered a strong AT support weapon to every OKW attack or defense, and forced medium tanks to fear volks blobs which they absolutely should not.
I agree that OKW may need another light AT option in the med truck to help it avoid always going to get a Puma, but let's see first.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
We are all freaking out about no handheld AT. An entire faction depends on no handheld AT in stock (Soviet army), another has no native snares on infantry and its AT is useless against light armor (Brits). We are going to test these changes, doesn't mean they are 100% definitely going to be how the game ends up in the future.
OKW shreks were always a problem because they vetted volks up too quickly and they offered a strong AT support weapon to every OKW attack or defense, and forced medium tanks to fear volks blobs which they absolutely should not.
I agree that OKW may need another light AT option in the med truck to help it avoid always going to get a Puma, but let's see first.
Posts: 467
OKW had it effrotelessly easy to deny all light armor and good part of medium armor with little to no skill, right now they will need to build dedicated units and actually use their heads to position and bait, like UKF and Sov did since forever.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Like blobbing Guards and Piats
Posts: 467
Good thing that guards are stock and PIATs actually can hit light vehicles
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Like blobbing Guards and Piats
Posts: 400
You're surprised at the outcry?
OKW had it effrotelessly easy to deny all light armor and good part of medium armor with little to no skill, right now they will need to build dedicated units and actually use their heads to position and bait, like UKF and Sov did since forever.
Obviously panic is the only possible choice from OKW players and especially the fanboys(just look at mycalliope alone loosing it).
There will be a lot of changes, a lot of new dynamics and synergies, we'll have to relearn at least 2 armies. Changes on this scale rarely happen.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
We are all freaking out about no handheld AT. An entire faction depends on no handheld AT in stock (Soviet army), another has no native snares on infantry and its AT is useless against light armor (Brits). We are going to test these changes, doesn't mean they are 100% definitely going to be how the game ends up in the future.
OKW shreks were always a problem because they vetted volks up too quickly and they offered a strong AT support weapon to every OKW attack or defense, and forced medium tanks to fear volks blobs which they absolutely should not.
I agree that OKW may need another light AT option in the med truck to help it avoid always going to get a Puma, but let's see first.
Posts: 871
Good thing that guards are stock and PIATs actually can hit light vehicles
Tell us the truth, your playercard is untainted with the filth of allied games played?
Posts: 97
Posts: 1276
Posts: 738
Posts: 70
Posts: 1108
Remember that volks have Fausts now, so you can still punish aggressive vehicle play (even better than before) since tank pushing will be alot harder now coz you can snare them.. Just make sure by the mid game you have 2x Raks.
Posts: 658
Posts: 526
*GASP!*
You mean like you'll have to actually put down mines and maybe actually consider what opponent does and go for Puma, just like ost goes for 222, USF for stuart, UKF for AEC and sov for SU-76/T-70 to deal with early vehicle from opponent instead of spamming most op handheld AT weapon on most basic infantry that doesn't even require any side costs!?
SUCH INJUSTICE!
Posts: 276
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |