Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I like the fact that usf have a versatile strong main line infantry but it just should not beat elite inf
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 175
does it matter if it's a design choice? there have been changes to the faction before.
beside, There's a difference between adding new unit and buffing existing one.
Posts: 4474
If investment in that inf is greater then what elite inf costs, then it should.
Elite inf doesn't translate to superior ubermensh walking over anything.
Even LMG paras have counters(as in single squad beating them mercilessly) and axis doesn't have ANYTHING that would be as expensive.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
What your versatile lmg rifle should beat lmg ober ?
(And as always you point mistake of the other or simply deny them )
Trying being constructive for once ?
Posts: 4474
So in term of balance, because it is all about that in fact. USF infantry and armor should be weaker because Axis faction have superior armor and elite infantry? You're not really neither constructive or balanced in your reasoning.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Ok bigger example should a Sherman beat a Pershing ?
(And yes rifle should stomp volk but ober are elite anti inf only if they can't do their job what are they there for ?
Posts: 4474
How are they not doing their job? If I follow your reasoning, M36 Jackson is a dedicated TD and then should 100% pen any heavy and super heavy.
Katitof-2018
4 Posts: 550 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1930
To me it doesn't matter. I would love some changes to USF, I think they are really boring to play atm. But, to Relic it apparently matters.
Posts: 4474
Elite infantry beats rifles, even rifles with double bars. Double bars have about the damage output of 1 lmg42 at max range.
The only issue is double 1919s on rifle and that's not an issue with rifles but an issue with the fact that you can get double 1919s on rifles.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 301
Just seems a bit pretentious is all.
Grim.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Dude the Jackson can pen other medium tank with ease for 209 to 240 damage but can't beat a tank that cost more like a tiger but still can damage it
Are ober cheaper than rifle ?
Posts: 4474
What you say isn't even true. Between Jackson and Pz4, the result depend on which shot first.
Katitof-2018
5 Posts: 243
It seems superfluous. Like saying your name after each sentence if you were having a conversation with someone.......when everyone's names are written on their foreheads XD
Posts: 1273
Posts: 54
Same with volks and rifle depends on cover but my point is dat a versatile inf Main line should not beat a more expensive dedicated anti infantry elite inf
(Like a Sherman vs an elefant)
 | Playercard of When God Made A Pershing | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4474
Then what does US have? Its armor is vastly outclassed, and you want OKW infantry to be better too just because some are classed as "elite"? Well then now US has shitty end game armour and also infantry who are going to die...
Lets not pretend making rangers or paratroopers (both doc dependent) is an answer...all OKW elite inf is long range and rangers are up close= worse in most cases.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 175
that seems like an awfully self limiting opinion. The terminator veterancy is barely 6 months old.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
What your versatile lmg rifle should beat lmg ober ?
(And as always you point mistake of the other or simply deny them )
Trying being constructive for once ?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1096
Yea I too find that odd too
Ruzen
 |
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
116 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
