Riflemen OP with Vet patch

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 13:07 PMGrim

why do you write your name at the bottom of each post?

seems utterly pointless....

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 14:21 PMBananenheld

WhY shouldnt he? Jeez

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 19:25 PMGrim

Just seems a bit pretentious is all.

Grim.

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 19:25 PMGrim

Just seems a bit pretentious is all.

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 21:27 PMPedro_Jedi

For the same reason Voltardark always thanks the opportunity to voice his opinions. Seems to be an understanding about writing etiquette.

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 21:49 PMMistah_S

So according to you, having different etiquette is now pretentious?

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 00:01 AMCookiezNcreem

Riflemen OP?

*checks playercard*


primarily axis player?


primarily team game player?



rank 1k?




10/10 thread

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2016, 22:48 PMKatitof

Do some history lessons.

Apparently you don't know why they were buffed in the first place.

Also, since that time, axis infantry is stronger and elite one reinforces for much less.

L2P thread, just like all the aaa ones.

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 22:40 PMFiresparks

USF needed something, but there were a lot of underused or underpowered unit like shermans, .50cal, m8a1, or the 57mm that could have been buffed.

Turning the riflemen into terminator just turn their meta one dimensional.

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 23:09 PMPutinist

They needed infantry that scaled into late game. Not much to choose from beside buffing riflemen.

Design problem

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 22:15 PMGrim

It seems superfluous. Like saying your name after each sentence if you were having a conversation with someone.......when everyone's names are written on their foreheads XD

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 23:09 PMPutinist

They needed infantry that scaled into late game. Not much to choose from beside buffing riflemen.

Design problem

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 00:52 AMFiresparks

The grenadier had slightly better veterancy but it only require a small tweak, not the terminator veteranccy. The other problem was the weak bar and the fact the USF depended entirely on their riflemen. Everything else is either poor or mediocre.

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 01:58 AMPutinist

You couldn't really compare their vet (still can't really) straight off as the two factions are designed differently. USF depend completely on their rifleme (as you say) by design, and they did not perform. If that design choice was going to be kept, they had to buff the vet simply. Not that I like it either..

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 00:14 AMStug life

Why instead of recived accuracy at vet 3 we give them 50-40% reinforce cost reduction ?

Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 00:01 AMCookiezNcreem

Riflemen OP?

*checks playercard*


primarily axis player?


primarily team game player?



rank 1k?




10/10 thread

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 00:14 AMStug life

Why instead of recived accuracy at vet 3 we give them 50-40% reinforce cost reduction ?

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 04:01 AMOmega_Warrior

Because they will still lose too many engagement lategame. The idea is that instead of having durability and reliability in the armor like most other factions. USF scales with durability in their infantry instead. And I think it is different then the way other factions scale, but it does work and shouldn't really be messed with.

USF is an infantry dependent army, and that isn't a bad thing.

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 08:30 AMKatitof

Because it doesn't fix anything and we'd be back where one of most expensive squads that can NOT rely on elite infantry spam like certain other army *cough*OKW*cough* has basic infantry that gets pushed around by much cheaper squads.