why do you write your name at the bottom of each post?
seems utterly pointless....
WhY shouldnt he? Jeez
Riflemen OP with Vet patch
13 Mar 2016, 14:21 PM
#21
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
WhY shouldnt he? Jeez
13 Mar 2016, 19:25 PM
#22
Posts: 1096
WhY shouldnt he? Jeez
Just seems a bit pretentious is all.
Grim.
13 Mar 2016, 21:27 PM
#23
Posts: 543
Just seems a bit pretentious is all.
Grim.
For the same reason Voltardark always thanks the opportunity to voice his opinions. Seems to be an understanding about writing etiquette.
13 Mar 2016, 21:46 PM
#24
Posts: 380
So why are you not even in a top 500 with op rifles? This is a troll tread.
13 Mar 2016, 21:49 PM
#25
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Just seems a bit pretentious is all.
So according to you, having different etiquette is now pretentious?
For the same reason Voltardark always thanks the opportunity to voice his opinions. Seems to be an understanding about writing etiquette.
+1
13 Mar 2016, 22:15 PM
#26
Posts: 1096
So according to you, having different etiquette is now pretentious?
It seems superfluous. Like saying your name after each sentence if you were having a conversation with someone.......when everyone's names are written on their foreheads XD
13 Mar 2016, 22:36 PM
#27
Posts: 395
Riflemen OP?
*checks playercard*
primarily axis player?
primarily team game player?
rank 1k?
10/10 thread
ravaged and savaged
I bought vCoH on January 3rd, 2007.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
13 Mar 2016, 22:40 PM
#28
Posts: 1930
Do some history lessons.
Apparently you don't know why they were buffed in the first place.
Also, since that time, axis infantry is stronger and elite one reinforces for much less.
L2P thread, just like all the aaa ones.
USF needed something, but there were a lot of underused or underpowered unit like shermans, .50cal, m8a1, or the 57mm that could have been buffed.
Turning the riflemen into terminator just turn their meta one dimensional.
13 Mar 2016, 23:09 PM
#29
Posts: 175
USF needed something, but there were a lot of underused or underpowered unit like shermans, .50cal, m8a1, or the 57mm that could have been buffed.
Turning the riflemen into terminator just turn their meta one dimensional.
They needed infantry that scaled into late game. Not much to choose from beside buffing riflemen.
Design problem
13 Mar 2016, 23:13 PM
#30
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
They needed infantry that scaled into late game. Not much to choose from beside buffing riflemen.
Design problem
Move Rifle vet 3 RA to Rears
(Relic, DO NOT DO THIS.)
13 Mar 2016, 23:46 PM
#31
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
It seems superfluous. Like saying your name after each sentence if you were having a conversation with someone.......when everyone's names are written on their foreheads XD
Guess he understands forums differently from you do.
I too try and be a little formal on here, but OP takes it to next level.
14 Mar 2016, 00:14 AM
#32
Posts: 4474
Why instead of recived accuracy at vet 3 we give them 50-40% reinforce cost reduction ?
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
14 Mar 2016, 00:52 AM
#33
Posts: 1930
They needed infantry that scaled into late game. Not much to choose from beside buffing riflemen.
Design problem
The grenadier had slightly better veterancy but it only require a small tweak, not the terminator veteranccy. The other problem was the weak bar and the fact the USF depended entirely on their riflemen. Everything else is either poor or mediocre.
14 Mar 2016, 01:58 AM
#34
Posts: 175
The grenadier had slightly better veterancy but it only require a small tweak, not the terminator veteranccy. The other problem was the weak bar and the fact the USF depended entirely on their riflemen. Everything else is either poor or mediocre.
You couldn't really compare their vet (still can't really) straight off as the two factions are designed differently. USF depend completely on their rifleme (as you say) by design, and they did not perform. If that design choice was going to be kept, they had to buff the vet simply. Not that I like it either..
14 Mar 2016, 03:45 AM
#35
Posts: 1930
You couldn't really compare their vet (still can't really) straight off as the two factions are designed differently. USF depend completely on their rifleme (as you say) by design, and they did not perform. If that design choice was going to be kept, they had to buff the vet simply. Not that I like it either..
does it matter if it's a design choice? there have been changes to the faction before.
beside, There's a difference between adding new unit and buffing existing one.
14 Mar 2016, 04:01 AM
#36
Posts: 2561
Why instead of recived accuracy at vet 3 we give them 50-40% reinforce cost reduction ?Because they will still lose too many engagement lategame. The idea is that instead of having durability and reliability in the armor like most other factions. USF scales with durability in their infantry instead. And I think it is different then the way other factions scale, but it does work and shouldn't really be messed with.
USF is an infantry dependent army, and that isn't a bad thing.
14 Mar 2016, 05:18 AM
#37
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
Riflemen OP?
primarily axis player?
primarily team game player?
rank 1k?
10/10 thread
Riflemen OP buff Axis
14 Mar 2016, 08:30 AM
#38
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Why instead of recived accuracy at vet 3 we give them 50-40% reinforce cost reduction ?
Because it doesn't fix anything and we'd be back where one of most expensive squads that can NOT rely on elite infantry spam like certain other army *cough*OKW*cough* has basic infantry that gets pushed around by much cheaper squads.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Mar 2016, 09:10 AM
#39
Posts: 4474
Because they will still lose too many engagement lategame. The idea is that instead of having durability and reliability in the armor like most other factions. USF scales with durability in their infantry instead. And I think it is different then the way other factions scale, but it does work and shouldn't really be messed with.
USF is an infantry dependent army, and that isn't a bad thing.
Yea I understand but with this they can't stomp ober and pg (elite infantry)
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
14 Mar 2016, 09:14 AM
#40
Posts: 4474
Because it doesn't fix anything and we'd be back where one of most expensive squads that can NOT rely on elite infantry spam like certain other army *cough*OKW*cough* has basic infantry that gets pushed around by much cheaper squads.
I like the fact that usf have a versatile strong main line infantry but it just should not beat elite inf
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265