M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate
Posts: 40
My logic is flawless...
Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4928
I initially disliked the idea of the Pershing because I was maining axis at the time, so typical axis fanboy behaviour, but since then I think it's more a case of USF need more variation and not bigger things to run away with.
I don't want one because a Sherman Jumbo would actually be a unique take on the "Heavy" Tank, rather than a copy of the Tiger or IS-2 like the Pershing will probably be. That and the Jumbo actually had an effect on the outcome of the war, while the Pershing showed up at the very end and did nothing spectacular, other than show the Soviets our most recent advancements in tank development right before our alliance was over (not that this mattered either!).
254 Sherman Jumbos officially produced, unknown number of custom conversions (tank crews salvaging armour from dead tanks and welding it to theirs), saw productive use in the Battle of the Bulge. Compared to 20 M26 Pershings (still known as T26E3 upon their arrival to Europe), a fraction of which saw action.
Posts: 2470
I don't want one because a Sherman Jumbo would actually be a unique take on the "Heavy" Tank, rather than a copy of the Tiger or IS-2 like the Pershing will probably be. That and the Jumbo actually had an effect on the outcome of the war, while the Pershing showed up at the very end and did nothing spectacular, other than show the Soviets our most recent advancements in tank development right before our alliance was over (not that this mattered either!).
254 Sherman Jumbos officially produced, unknown number of custom conversions (tank crews salvaging armour from dead tanks and welding it to theirs), saw productive use in the Battle of the Bulge. Compared to 20 M26 Pershings (still known as T26E3 upon their arrival to Europe), a fraction of which saw action.
we all know the ostwind, 251/17, and sturm tiger are what nearly won the war for the germans.
Posts: 4928
we all know the ostwind, 251/17, and sturm tiger are what nearly won the war for the germans.
The Ostwind should have been a Wirbelwind, only because the Möbelwagen would need a set-up and tear-down time, which doesn't fit the role of a mobile anti-infantry weapon. Rather, it would be temporary static-defense.
251/17 should have been the 251/21 Drilling, but Drilling didn't need to 'setup' because it had fixed panels, so the unit would function more like the Soviet Quad, which may have been too similar.
The Sturmtiger gets a pass solely because there is nothing else like it that could take on the function it has in-game, but I still think it's a silly unit and hard to balance.
I have similar feelings about the Jagdtiger, would have preferred a Jagdpanther instead.
Posts: 758
The Ostwind should have been a Wirbelwind, only because the Möbelwagen would need a set-up and tear-down time, which doesn't fit the role of a mobile anti-infantry weapon. Rather, it would be temporary static-defense.
251/17 should have been the 251/21 Drilling, but Drilling didn't need to 'setup' because it had fixed panels, so the unit would function more like the Soviet Quad, which may have been too similar.
The Sturmtiger gets a pass solely because there is nothing else like it that could take on the function it has in-game, but I still think it's a silly unit and hard to balance.
I have similar feelings about the Jagdtiger, would have preferred a Jagdpanther instead.
if they are in there then the M26 should be in there too its no fair that the axis get all cool looking hard hitting toys while the USF is given short-end-of-the-stick, hand-me-down hardware
Posts: 1891
Posts: 928
*Axis Fanboyism* WE NEED MORE WT AUF E100s with autoloaders *end Axis Fanboyism*
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 228
Calliope would be very welcomed for me. I feel like some of USF late-game struggles comes from their lack of real artillery so its very difficult to clear out an Ost. player who has dug in somewhere with MG42s and Paks especcially on certain maps like when you spawn South on Langresaya
yeah axis retardboys compare a m8 scott to a stuka or katyusha, that makes me so
Posts: 11
Posts: 168
There is no denying that some further reworks are needed to all factions even when discounting the balance issues. And I would hazard a guess that Relic will do this with the commander rework etc which cant be too far away now.
Posts: 4928
Wouldn't the Sherman Jumbo just be a glorified KV1? Nothing to be too excited about.
And the Pershing would just be a copy+paste IS-2. So interesting.
Besides, the Jumbo had superior performance to the KV-1. Armour was better, and they could be armed with 76mm guns.
Posts: 1216
And the Pershing would just be a copy+paste IS-2. So interesting.
Besides, the Jumbo had superior performance to the KV-1. Armour was better, and they could be armed with 76mm guns.
You know, you still haven't actually defined your idea of what a heavy tank is. Also, calling Pershing a Tiger/IS2 copy paste is, well, like saying Obama's a Muslim.
Posts: 4928
You know, you still haven't actually defined your idea of what a heavy tank is.
What is this even supposed to mean?
Posts: 1216
Posts: 4928
It means you're throwing that term around without actually telling us what it is, and when I asked you to define that term you ignored that request.
I ignored it because it wasn't relevant.
Posts: 1216
As for comparing M26 to IS-2, your comparison relies entirely on the presumption that it WOULD be the same as the IS-2, whereas not everyone has made such claims. I for one would not want the 26 to be "USF IS-2". Again, whatever that means, but I'll assume you won't bother elaborating on that either.
Posts: 4928
Then you're speaking nonsense when you insist things are heavy vehicles and not even bothering to explain why. Jumbos, for example, are the closest to what US troops had to heavy tanks, because they had no actual heavy tanks outside of the M26. Closest to heavy =/= actual heavy.
You're not telling me what I'm supposed to explain, you're asking "What is a Heavy Tank" and withholding any other relevant information, probably trying to get me to say something incorrect so you can "prove" me wrong. Why does the definition matter so much as long as the unit performs well? A Jumbo Sherman would give the Americans a more durable tank whilst also being unique compared to the Tiger or IS-2.
Livestreams
65 | |||||
40 | |||||
34 | |||||
13 | |||||
12 | |||||
6 | |||||
1 | |||||
640 | |||||
13 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.838223.790+1
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.590233.717+6
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1118621.643-1
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, KETTA
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM