Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Still the Kubelwagon is a #$%@#$% volkswagen and it can survive 1 shot from sherman or at gun.
Posts: 345
Not sure if serious ...
I'am not really sure that the Katyusha need the ability to pin any squad caught in the barrage area ( a full screen or little less ) ?
Ostheer have to call a plane to pin squad, in a reduct area compared to katyusha aoe range, and will not kill infantry ( or 1-2 entity maybe )
An already muni starved faction (OKW) is now more muni starved and still can't build caches.
Posts: 3293
The Katyusha was known for his ability to strike terror on the German troops, I think that should immobilize the troops that are within the impact area of the barrage. What do you think?
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Ihmo troll thread, but come on, the ostheer plane pin any and all squads in their area while katyusha can hit or miss squad in its area....really different ones.
In addition one is an ability and you don´t need to tech for it....so reaaaaaally differents one, no room for comparing them.
Posts: 209
Realism is not a measurement for balance. Also it makes no sense that any tank survives a penetrating shot in this game.
Why every thread has to turn into a fanboy war?
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Uh, due to OKW's fuel penalty the Stuka costs about 136 fuel, so it's almost worth two Kat's. The Kat and Stuka are also two different rolls of artillery, the Kat is focused on area denial and the Stuka is made for breaking enemy defensive lines in preparation for an assault.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Cost about 136 fuel ? Really ?
Alex please meet with math at first and then start saying something ...
When okw get 66 % fuel penalty(in reality is is something near 70 % because fuel poins give you 71% [you get 5 fuel from 7] if we talk theoreticly in half map control)
And if you get 66 % fuel it means you get 100 fuel instaed of 150 (if you were other faction) because 66 % of 150 fuel is 100 F
And 66% of 136 fuel is something about 90 fuel.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned
axis
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
OKW get 71% (well give or take sometimes it can actually be the 66% or sometime 73% depending on map control) on average. Now, here's the math.
100/.73 = 136, 100/.71 = 140.
The reason why you want to do this conversion when talking about unit cost is that it means OKW artificially will never be able to match the enemy in amount of vehicles made (this is by design).
Posts: 2742
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
s
Posts: 57
Posts: 1701
I'm really tempted to believe you....
But you have one game as Soviets ever played................
Posts: 1216
Posts: 306
troll thread
Step-by-step relic balance
If an allied unit has an equivalent axis unit it must be either
1. not cost-effective
2. useless
3. be effective at feeding axis units vet
4. or all the above
Posts: 33
He hasn't even said anything "bullshit" in this thread, man.
It's true: the Stuka and the Katy fulfill different roles. Personally, I'd rather have a Katy than a Stuka, since it's cheaper, can fire more often and, in my opinion, is easier to aim effectively. Often when I'm playing OKW I find that the long line shape of the Stuka's barrage doesn't match the shape of my target. Meanwhile, the nice simple Katy circle is always effective no matter what you're shooting at, and covers a fair breadth too. Sure the Stuka may be able to do more damage to precise locations, but the Katy just feels overall more consistent to me.
Posts: 176
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWdd6_ZxX8c
Personally, I'd rather have a Katy than a Stuka, since it's cheaper, can fire more often and, in my opinion, is easier to aim effectively.
since it's cheaper, can fire more often and, in my opinion,
in my opinion
Posts: 598
Posts: 2053
Just because it's feared doesn't mean everything else wasn't scary in comparison.
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
99 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
