Most of the performance problems in COH2 seem to be CPU related, not GPU related. I went from a GTX 570 to a GTX970, and there wasn't much of a performance change. The only thing that improved was being able to max out texture quality, since the lowly ~1.2gb on the 570 was getting maxed out constantly, and causing stuttering. Otherwise, the FPS was pretty much the same (since nothing else changed).
What are the rest of your specs? CPU/RAM/etc.?
 |
|
With a GTX 970, i get between 80~120 fps. |
Scatter Angle:
Panzer IV: 7.5
Sherman: 6.0
Scatter Distance:
Panzer IV: 6.4
Sherman: 6.2
Uh, USF is late 1944. The US Army was very stubborn and refused to accept the 76mm Shermans as a replacement despite superior AT performance. In their minds, Shermans weren't supposed to fight Tanks, they were supposed to fight Infantry and Fortifications, and for this the Army kept using low velocity guns because of their superior HE round. They believed that Tank Destroyers were supposed to kill tanks, although this is poorly represented because the USF Tank Destroyers in CoH2 lack their real-life advantages.
The US Army didn't change their minds until losses incurred during the Ardennes Counteroffensive which were the result of Tank Destroyers being too few and Shermans being incapable of fighting Panzers efficiently. It was after this that Eisenhower finally gave the order to cease production and delivery of 75mm Shermans and send only 76mm Shermans.
This is a myth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNjp_4jY8pY
20:00 |
|
Steam Alias: Vítor
17-digit Steam ID#: 76561198001604015
|
|
Something like the nebelwerfer? Oh god, please no. |
Well it's not a problem per sé, it's more of an observation that keeps being confirmed because it just keeps happening.
Besides, observation is not dogmatic, if it stops happening I will adjust my view. So that's not dogmatic.
Having a general "rule" or "assumption" and sticking with it no matter what your own observation tells you is dogmatic. That's not what I'm doing here.
I originally also had the assumption that axis was generally stronger than allies but with what has happened to me recently has changed that belief (I'm not saying axis is always weaker than allies but they are certainly not stronger, at least not anymore). In other words, I experienced something and adjusted my view accordingly and that's anything but dogmatic.
Statistics gathered from many thousands of games are more reliable than your personal experience. |
This thread is a about 3v3 and 4v4 with randoms (as opposed to an arranged team), not about 1v1 and 2v2 (as I clearly stated in my original post). So us playing a 1v1 wouldn't prove any point at all.
Axis is much more powerful in large team games, so yes, it would prove much. |
That's it i'm not using this forum any longer! I haven't been here long but I'm done being isulted by people calling me "ill informed" and sometimes even "stupid". I have these impressions about the game for a reason and I hate not being taken seriously!
goodbey people!
Care to prove your point? Let's play 1x1, you can play as allies. |
you obviously missed the point there. I was stressing my point that obersoldaten are not invincible.
No, but they are hugely cost effective. Much more than riflemen, and you have the same income. So how are you being swarmed by infantry? |
I said it is not a learn to play issue! It's very easy to say that when you want to prove your point. you have never seen me play so I suggest you leave my skill of the game out of it!
What you are saying is not true at all! mortars of axis are difficult to deal with?
Excuse me but wehr or okw is not the one with 120mm monsters!
Obers win every engagement? Not true at all! try holding off a swarm off 6 riflemen when only thing you can afford is 2 obersoldaten. Believe me the obersoldaten lose, even though they are behind green cover. Grenades make sure of that!
Besides, having better tanks is useless when you can't afford them because the allies swarmed all over the fuel.
I have a reason why I have this opinion and I do not come to a conclusion lightly.usually I even overananlyse so when I form a conclusion there is a damn good reason for it. I which I didn't have to come to this conclusion honestly but I did because I couldn't ignore what I see any longer.
Please, explain why 1680mp worth of riflemen should not beat 800mp worth of obers? |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
