Should the SU76 cost fuel?

Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 18:56 PMHighfiveeeee

Of course it should. Maybe it shpuld cost a bit less or be a bit stronger but a fuel free tank?
Lol.

Do you think John Doe creates too many useless polls?

[_] Yes.
[_] YES.

Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 18:53 PMJohn Doe

Given that it has a light support role and can be countered by a 222, I think this unit would be much more useful if it only costed MP.

Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 20:55 PMDucati

It appears I may have been mislead by the title/post confusion as well. I may have voted incorrectly as I'm still not clear as to whether the poll refers to your post or title of the thread.

The SU76 should cost fuel.

Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 20:33 PMRPhilMan1

Your polls are bad and you should feel bad.

Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 21:38 PMDoomgunner

Does the 222 cost fuel?

Jump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 19:29 PMCabreza

The SU-76 is a vehicle and all vehicles in CoH2 cost fuel. Even the Kubel costs fuel now. The 76 either needs to be re-balanced to function more like the Scott so it has a defined AI role in T4 or it needs to be swapped with the T70 and be re-balanced to have a defined AT role in T3. I would personally favor the latter solution as it would create an interesting choice between tiers. T3 would offer T34s that need to be backed by SU-76s to take on heavier armor while T4 would have SU-85s to deal with armor but have to rely on T70s or Katyushas for infantry. That way there is some nice synergy between the tanks in each tier instead of the current situation where T3 is AI tanks with minimal AT capabilities and T4 is pure AT tanks and arty.