Login

russian armor

Should the SU76 cost fuel?

Good idea?
Option Distribution Votes
47%
53%
Total votes: 58
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
13 Feb 2015, 18:53 PM
#1
avatar of John Doe

Posts: 75

Given that it has a light support role and can be countered by a 222, I think this unit would be much more useful if it only costed MP.
13 Feb 2015, 18:56 PM
#2
avatar of Highfiveeeee

Posts: 1740

Of course it should. Maybe it shpuld cost a bit less or be a bit stronger but a fuel free tank?
Lol.
13 Feb 2015, 19:00 PM
#3
avatar of CasTroy

Posts: 559

Of course it should. Maybe it shpuld cost a bit less or be a bit stronger but a fuel free tank?
Lol.

+1

Next poll please.
13 Feb 2015, 19:06 PM
#4
avatar of Nebaka

Posts: 133

Do you think John Doe creates too many useless polls?

[_] Yes.
[_] YES.
13 Feb 2015, 19:08 PM
#5
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

yes, but it should be buffed. making it cost 100 fuel and be as effective as a zis gun (along with being swapped with t-70) would be an excellent move.
13 Feb 2015, 19:09 PM
#6
avatar of boc120

Posts: 245

Nebaka, I vote yes. On topic, of course it should cost fuel. It has a free barrage ability and can be a decent support for your AT guns and other support weapons. It's not great, it needs some tweaks, but not making it fuel-free.
13 Feb 2015, 19:11 PM
#7
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

Just make it so it has actually good stats, it's not that hard.
13 Feb 2015, 19:29 PM
#8
avatar of Cabreza

Posts: 656

The SU-76 is a vehicle and all vehicles in CoH2 cost fuel. Even the Kubel costs fuel now. The 76 either needs to be re-balanced to function more like the Scott so it has a defined AI role in T4 or it needs to be swapped with the T70 and be re-balanced to have a defined AT role in T3. I would personally favor the latter solution as it would create an interesting choice between tiers. T3 would offer T34s that need to be backed by SU-76s to take on heavier armor while T4 would have SU-85s to deal with armor but have to rely on T70s or Katyushas for infantry. That way there is some nice synergy between the tanks in each tier instead of the current situation where T3 is AI tanks with minimal AT capabilities and T4 is pure AT tanks and arty.
13 Feb 2015, 19:33 PM
#9
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Stop making obvious trolling poll, please.
13 Feb 2015, 19:43 PM
#10
avatar of Jawohl?

Posts: 97

this troll account lol
13 Feb 2015, 19:48 PM
#11
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

Yea why not, Obers come with free LMG #RelicLogic
13 Feb 2015, 20:33 PM
#12
avatar of RPhilMan1

Posts: 106

You ask "Should the SU76 cost fuel?" in the thread title but the poll title asks "Good idea?", which I'm guessing refers to your post, which states the SU-76 should only cost manpower. Therefore answering "yes" in the poll would agree with your statement about the SU-76 not having a fuel cost, when people may want to vote "yes" saying the SU-76 should cost fuel, as the thread title asks. That is extremely misleading.

Of course it should cost fuel.

Your polls are bad and you should feel bad.
13 Feb 2015, 20:55 PM
#13
avatar of Ducati
Benefactor 115

Posts: 164

It appears I may have been mislead by the title/post confusion as well. I may have voted incorrectly as I'm still not clear as to whether the poll refers to your post or title of the thread.

The SU76 should cost fuel.
13 Feb 2015, 21:38 PM
#14
avatar of Doomgunner

Posts: 74

Given that it has a light support role and can be countered by a 222, I think this unit would be much more useful if it only costed MP.


Does the 222 cost fuel?
13 Feb 2015, 21:42 PM
#15
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 20:55 PMDucati
It appears I may have been mislead by the title/post confusion as well. I may have voted incorrectly as I'm still not clear as to whether the poll refers to your post or title of the thread.

The SU76 should cost fuel.
13 Feb 2015, 22:14 PM
#16
avatar of John Doe

Posts: 75



Your polls are bad and you should feel bad.


Wow so you want to control how I feel about myself and my polls, bob marley?

The su76 being a comedy unit is a well known fact. It always gives me giggles when i face an opponent building an su76, ROFL.
13 Feb 2015, 22:15 PM
#17
avatar of isoul

Posts: 48

It should cost fuel BUT it should cost less (at least with its current strengths and shortcomings).
13 Feb 2015, 22:17 PM
#18
avatar of John Doe

Posts: 75



Does the 222 cost fuel?

Yes but how much? 15. Much cheaper I would say.
13 Feb 2015, 22:26 PM
#19
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 19:29 PMCabreza
The SU-76 is a vehicle and all vehicles in CoH2 cost fuel. Even the Kubel costs fuel now. The 76 either needs to be re-balanced to function more like the Scott so it has a defined AI role in T4 or it needs to be swapped with the T70 and be re-balanced to have a defined AT role in T3. I would personally favor the latter solution as it would create an interesting choice between tiers. T3 would offer T34s that need to be backed by SU-76s to take on heavier armor while T4 would have SU-85s to deal with armor but have to rely on T70s or Katyushas for infantry. That way there is some nice synergy between the tanks in each tier instead of the current situation where T3 is AI tanks with minimal AT capabilities and T4 is pure AT tanks and arty.


If only the relic developers could understand that this leads to much better gameplay than T34/85 or IS-2 spam every game.
13 Feb 2015, 22:31 PM
#20
avatar of wolfram

Posts: 20

Yes to no fuel or yes to a good idea? Which is it?
0 user is browsing this thread:

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: Buy our cool new large tanks that will never get played on the 4 new 1v1 maps added. Perfect synergy! :facepalm:
Yesterday, 19:23 PM
Rosbone: Everyone ready for some deep penetration :snfPeter:
Yesterday, 17:13 PM
Lady Xenarra: I'm sure the ppl who defended it as balanced for Allies will be screaming like they got scaled with boiling water, in COH3. How the tables turn.
Yesterday, 11:33 AM
Willy Pete: I think it was nuts with any engine damage. Especially on superheavies
Yesterday, 07:03 AM
aerafield: Personally I think without the ram ability, it's worse than loiters for example
Yesterday, 00:09 AM
Willy Pete: It combined well with most slowing abilities, not just ram stuns
Last Wednesday, 23:36 PM
Willy Pete: Only??? I think not being able to shoot it down and the ramp up effect also had something to do with it
Last Wednesday, 23:34 PM
Willy Pete: Really
Last Wednesday, 23:30 PM
aerafield: AT overwatch was broken only because it came with the faction of T34 ramming
Last Wednesday, 22:29 PM
Willy Pete: Love to see Relic really learning from their past mistakes. Let's bring back the dumbest ability in coh2, and charge money for it
Last Wednesday, 20:34 PM
Willy Pete: New DAK commander will have AT overwatch as alternate choice to elefant
Last Wednesday, 20:33 PM
aaa: Funy thing new players dont know that. And are trying to compete vs hacks
Last Wednesday, 10:33 AM
aaa: Online gaming is trash in general, not just coh. On high level there are all cheats in most games
Last Wednesday, 10:24 AM
aaa: 2 cheaters in 3 days. MH and DH
Last Wednesday, 09:57 AM
aerafield: I am a simple man, I build Humvees with Pathfinders and Missile Launchers inside, I am happy
Last Tuesday, 20:57 PM
Lady Xenarra: aerafield lamevee spammer confirmed :nahnah:
Last Tuesday, 20:42 PM
aerafield: those who know, know: https://www.reddit.com/r/CompanyOfHeroes/s/fPk4yLIgmK
Last Tuesday, 15:40 PM
adamírcz: Might be onto somethin here, combine side armour existing, maps where flanking is a viable option, and hopefully also heavies actually being less manouverable than mediums (lookin at you coh2), and it might be fun gameplay
Last Monday, 13:39 PM
Willy Pete: Shouldn't coh3 heavies actually have insane front armor values? The glory days of 400+ Kt armor wouldn't be as bad when side armor is a thing. Not to say its a good idea lol
14 Feb 2025, 23:14 PM
aerafield: But then again, maybe CoH3 superheavies should actually have insane armor values because the whole game is designed for the clumsy & inept anyway :snfPeter:
14 Feb 2025, 23:04 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

280 users are online: 280 guests
1 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51821
Welcome our newest member, w88wall
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM