M2HB .50 Cal Machine Gun
11 Feb 2015, 06:27 AM
#61
8 
Posts: 2470
BARs
11 Feb 2015, 18:37 PM
#62
Posts: 556
Iam the only one who thinks this MG is to weak for a .50 cal round? I actually fire the m2 while in the service and i have to say that this weapon is not meant to suppress, its design to tear apart the cover and man behind cover. It should be tearing apart light armor vehicles as well.
11 Feb 2015, 19:34 PM
#63
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Iam the only one who thinks this MG is to weak for a .50 cal round? I actually fire the m2 while in the service and i have to say that this weapon is not meant to suppress, its design to tear apart the cover and man behind cover. It should be tearing apart light armor vehicles as well.
Please do not argue about the real life features of the weapon, it's pointless. M2HB has the best stats damage-wise you can look it up, its major issue which makes it a bad choice is its fragility. The gunner dies from angina when he sees a horde of Obers, they other panic and shoot each other.
In game mechanics, this weapon should effectively suppress the enemy, which it can't.
12 Feb 2015, 02:35 AM
#64
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
m2 has same problem as all the other hmg weapons teams. suppression is not consistent.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
12 Feb 2015, 03:01 AM
#65
Posts: 1026
Iam the only one who thinks this MG is to weak for a .50 cal round? I actually fire the m2 while in the service and i have to say that this weapon is not meant to suppress, its design to tear apart the cover and man behind cover. It should be tearing apart light armor vehicles as well.
The 50 cal could use the same "partial cover negation" statistic that the Obers have on their magical STGs, lol.
12 Feb 2015, 05:26 AM
#66
Posts: 108 | Subs: 1
What? No. Its a feature that your .50 cal that was known to punch through Panzer 4 armor is virtually indistinguishable from the MG42 except for the lack of incendiary rounds (and was that sprint I saw that US machine gun crews get? Because they're going to run with a fucking M2?)
12 Feb 2015, 06:13 AM
#67
5 
Posts: 115
We all have seen what a M2 .50 Cal can do to concrete or metal. It's just plain stupid that Relic added this HMG and made it so powerless. It should melt light vehicles and light tanks, not to talk about infantry or cover.
The actual HMG reminds more of the .30 cal like the one we can see here:
The actual HMG reminds more of the .30 cal like the one we can see here:
12 Feb 2015, 09:14 AM
#68
Posts: 394
We all have seen what a M2 .50 Cal can do to concrete or metal. It's just plain stupid that Relic added this HMG and made it so powerless. It should melt light vehicles and light tanks, not to talk about infantry or cover.
The actual HMG reminds more of the .30 cal like the one we can see here:
lol that's a .30 cal at the bottom
Porygon Wrote:
I don't like Soviet neither, but please cake, just fuck off back to the official noob forum.
Vetlolcake:
Should i just attack move to get there? I might get there easier. Like sovs do
I don't like Soviet neither, but please cake, just fuck off back to the official noob forum.
Vetlolcake:
Should i just attack move to get there? I might get there easier. Like sovs do
12 Feb 2015, 14:16 PM
#69
Posts: 1130
use the 50 cal like a mg42 and support it with infantry its to frail unlike the maxim. that said when it has one of the best dps/suppression of any mg in the game
horrida flamma bella
12 Feb 2015, 15:23 PM
#70
5 Posts: 115
lol that's a .30 cal at the bottom
As I said
"The actual HMG reminds more of the .30 cal like the one we can see here:"
12 Feb 2015, 16:32 PM
#71
Posts: 1637
I am surprised that two people actually think the M2 is ok. I can never find a use for it. Although I can with the MG42 and the Maxim. Its too expensive, comes too late, and dies too fast.
I have resorted to building an FP behind my troops as a fall back during a Push. This of the M15 are reliable suppression. The M2 is simply not. It can be used to Great Success. So can the SU76. That doesnt mean its not crap overall.
Personally relic can feel free to mess with its Arc or Setup time or whatever else they want as long as they make it so it can survive at LEAST a single Vet Ober Squad or Rnade from the front.
Because lets face it. You can micro all you like but the other player is a player as well. Not some stupid bot. You will get flanked from time to time. And when you do the 50 is a loss.
I have resorted to building an FP behind my troops as a fall back during a Push. This of the M15 are reliable suppression. The M2 is simply not. It can be used to Great Success. So can the SU76. That doesnt mean its not crap overall.
Personally relic can feel free to mess with its Arc or Setup time or whatever else they want as long as they make it so it can survive at LEAST a single Vet Ober Squad or Rnade from the front.
Because lets face it. You can micro all you like but the other player is a player as well. Not some stupid bot. You will get flanked from time to time. And when you do the 50 is a loss.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
12 Feb 2015, 16:42 PM
#72
Posts: 1484
Sometimes, I just skip the .50cal completely and build a forward fighting position instead, cheap and locks the area down.
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
13 Feb 2015, 00:08 AM
#73
8 Posts: 2470
the M2 can definitely be powerful and i've used it effectively on several occasions, but it the cost and fragility are serious marks against it.
14 Feb 2015, 13:47 PM
#74
Posts: 75
A wider arc is all it needs. It's the best mg in game imo.
15 Feb 2015, 05:31 AM
#75
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Reinforcement cost doesn't help at all.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
15 Feb 2015, 06:57 AM
#76
Posts: 87
Even when supported it just isn't viable right now imo
true ..
15 Feb 2015, 07:14 AM
#77
Posts: 521
Yes I think a damage oriented MG could help USF a lot; especially against light vehicles since LT doesn't have any AT at his tier that doesn't cost fuel.
Find out about my redesign of all four factions, with more to come!
Feel free to contact me regarding your Attribute Editor-related questions.
Feel free to contact me regarding your Attribute Editor-related questions.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
823 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.599215.736+14
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
685 users are online:
685 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49100
Welcome our newest member, Modarov
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Modarov
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM