Login

russian armor

My problem with OKW and USF

11 Oct 2014, 21:25 PM
#41
avatar of ASneakyFox

Posts: 365

bazookas NEVER hit anything. its a huge mistake to buy them as they are now because not only do they not hit, your giving up your squad's firepower to lug the things around.. and they dont hit anyway. even in scenarios where ive let my riflemen squad get off 2 sets of bazooka volleys i tend to miss completely on both volleys.

even if the bazookas were to hit, at grenades are on average more cost effective (especially if you add in the value of manpower saved for the rifles that didnt die because of your reduced firepower, and the fuel saved that could go towards a sherman or jackson). Your riflemen will need to go in to a LOT of tank battles before the bazookas start paying off.

Its much better to just get a tank or an at gun, something that wont miss >75% of the time so you can work with a reliable strategy.
11 Oct 2014, 21:34 PM
#42
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2014, 23:30 PMSeeker


I believe it is because they are horrible without schrecks, they kind of need them to get vet fast.

From vet1 onwards they perform better then conscripts.

Explain this.
11 Oct 2014, 22:28 PM
#43
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Oct 2014, 21:34 PMKatitof

From vet1 onwards they perform better then conscripts.

Explain this.


Last time i checked volks dont have access to molotovs oorah or at nades.
12 Oct 2014, 00:07 AM
#44
avatar of Enkidu

Posts: 351

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Oct 2014, 22:28 PMJaigen


Last time i checked volks dont have access to molotovs oorah or at nades.

Yeah, just better nades, panzershreks and vet 5.
12 Oct 2014, 08:35 AM
#45
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2014, 00:07 AMEnkidu

Yeah, just better nades, panzershreks and vet 5.


Better nades is dependant on skill. if somebody is not paying attention the potato smasher is indeed batter but on my level most people will dodge it. it makes molotov just way better for denying your opponent cover. shrek and at nades are about equal in utility. and ffs people stop saying vet 4 and 5 because even for volks its fairly hard to reach that rank in 1 vs 1 let alone other units.
12 Oct 2014, 15:38 PM
#46
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

Schrecks are justt 1000 times better than AT Nade. WOuld you mind if conscripts got Schrecks and VOlks getting AT Nades instead? I would like to also point out that molotov has the second(?) slowest animation in the game.
12 Oct 2014, 17:36 PM
#47
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2014, 08:35 AMJaigen


Better nades is dependant on skill.


and RNG
12 Oct 2014, 18:26 PM
#48
avatar of Greeb

Posts: 971

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2014, 08:35 AMJaigen
people stop saying vet 4 and 5 because even for volks its fairly hard to reach that rank in 1 vs 1 let alone other units.


I disagree.

It's very easy to get vet 5 with volks due to their cheap price and the damage done with the panzerschreks.
12 Oct 2014, 18:31 PM
#49
avatar of Enkidu

Posts: 351

Sorry, I didn't mean to sound bitter but cons suck right now at any point past like the 5 minute mark and it just kind of bugs me when people say or imply that volks are worse. Volks scale pretty darn well and cons don't.
12 Oct 2014, 18:37 PM
#50
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2014, 08:35 AMJaigen


Better nades is dependant on skill. if somebody is not paying attention the potato smasher is indeed batter but on my level most people will dodge it. it makes molotov just way better for denying your opponent cover. shrek and at nades are about equal in utility. and ffs people stop saying vet 4 and 5 because even for volks its fairly hard to reach that rank in 1 vs 1 let alone other units.


Wrong.

AT weapons give ALL infantry nasty vet. I once put double zooks on a rear echelon squad. the fired both zooks at stug E. instant vet 3

I had volks kill an EZ8 sherman. they went from vet 3 to vet 5
13 Oct 2014, 00:20 AM
#51
avatar of The_Courier

Posts: 665

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Oct 2014, 23:30 PMSeeker


I believe it is because they are horrible without schrecks, they kind of need them to get vet fast.


Meh, they still get a good grenade, and their DPS is not much lower than conscript's while they are vastly more durable. Shrecks also allow them to vet very easily, while vet 3 conscripts are a rarity unless they got PPShs.

Plus, it's not like OKW lacks for powerful non-doctrinal infantry. Soviets only have Penals, and they need to forgo Maxims and AT guns to get em.
13 Oct 2014, 00:31 AM
#52
avatar of Soheil

Posts: 658



Meh, they still get a good grenade, and their DPS is not much lower than conscript's while they are vastly more durable. Shrecks also allow them to vet very easily, while vet 3 conscripts are a rarity unless they got PPShs.

Plus, it's not like OKW lacks for powerful non-doctrinal infantry. Soviets only have Penals, and they need to forgo Maxims and AT guns to get em.

how about m3(kubels counter) and sniper (strmpios counter) in begining?
13 Oct 2014, 00:45 AM
#53
avatar of Soheil

Posts: 658

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Oct 2014, 18:31 PMEnkidu
Sorry, I didn't mean to sound bitter but cons suck right now at any point past like the 5 minute mark and it just kind of bugs me when people say or imply that volks are worse. Volks scale pretty darn well and cons don't.

u shouldnt compare cons vs volks, soviets starting=combined army(maxim mortar m3 sniper zis......)but okw doesnt have these units to rush.main usefull unit in starting vs soviet just volks(kubel weak vs maxim or m3) sturmpio(weak vs maxim or sniper) if volks become weaker then soviet will eat okw easily.
18 Oct 2014, 23:53 PM
#54
avatar of DakkaIsMagic

Posts: 403

50.Cal needs to be in the first building for USF. That would solve alota things.
19 Oct 2014, 02:02 AM
#55
avatar of GLaDOnOS

Posts: 3

50.Cal needs to be in the first building for USF. That would solve alota things.
I like but what do you put at Tier 2?
19 Oct 2014, 15:36 PM
#56
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

USF is blobby not because you build a bunch of rifles, it's that to tech, you have to build MORE infantry squads.

You build your infantry force, then you have a bunch of other infantry squads that are REQUIRED to field more advanced units. Only the LT comes out early enough to potentially replace a rifleman squad. The early game necessitates using manpower effectively, and the USF is good at this.

It's as USF enters the midgame that they are forced to keep churning out infantry to get any sort of tech. That's when they're left with this unwieldly blob.
19 Oct 2014, 18:53 PM
#57
avatar of kafrion

Posts: 371

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Oct 2014, 00:45 AMSoheil

u shouldnt compare cons vs volks, soviets starting=combined army(maxim mortar m3 sniper zis......)but okw doesnt have these units to rush.main usefull unit in starting vs soviet just volks(kubel weak vs maxim or m3) sturmpio(weak vs maxim or sniper) if volks become weaker then soviet will eat okw easily.


okw has the only t1 at unit which gets very good with vet and is perfect aghainst m3s and the like as for snipers they can be suppressed by kubeljesus or flanked and cut to pieces by sturmpios
20 Oct 2014, 00:25 AM
#58
avatar of Soheil

Posts: 658

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Oct 2014, 18:53 PMkafrion


okw has the only t1 at unit which gets very good with vet and is perfect aghainst m3s and the like as for snipers they can be suppressed by kubeljesus or flanked and cut to pieces by sturmpios

i meant in begining okw doesnt have vet infantry and strmpio with that cost of rnforce dont have any advantage to rush vs m3sniper......just def or lay mine if u be lucky(i meant starting)
20 Oct 2014, 02:41 AM
#59
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

USF is blobby not because you build a bunch of rifles, it's that to tech, you have to build MORE infantry squads.

You build your infantry force, then you have a bunch of other infantry squads that are REQUIRED to field more advanced units. Only the LT comes out early enough to potentially replace a rifleman squad. The early game necessitates using manpower effectively, and the USF is good at this.

It's as USF enters the midgame that they are forced to keep churning out infantry to get any sort of tech. That's when they're left with this unwieldly blob.
You know just because you have a lot of infantry doesn't mean you have to blob. I usually keep all my infantry in atleast 2 seperate groups at all times so they all can't get suppressed at once.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Livestreams

unknown 19
Germany 15
Canada 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

390 users are online: 390 guests
0 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
72 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53418
Welcome our newest member, vin88xink1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM