Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
As far as I can remember their where issues with Luch being detected easier when in camo mode.
With changes to penetration remove the bonus damage to emplacements.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Also UKF's centaur is locked behind 125 fuel if you include starting fuel. So I am not sure how a doctrinal Ostwind locked behind 135 fuel is crazy gamebreaking OP.
UKF still gets all the needed tools even if rushing T3 ASAP including things that OKW doesn't have like sniper and combat-oriented ultra light vehicle.
 | Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
-Give Volks fausts on track call-in and nades on track deployed. Objectively volks dont nessery need flamenades so early, while they do need fausts, because of M3 and Bren carrier.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
This is actually SPECIFICALLY why they DO NOT have fausts from get go, so these units can actually be used against them, especially M3 as UC does something from range.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
All this does allows to cheese out usage of this units, because you have no tools to respond aside from raketen which is a suicidal invesment early on, because of map controll against both soviets and UKF.
There are no justification for flame M3 to just retreat wipe and run freely, and for UC to have 0 threat what so ever but small arms fire.
Not to mention Pfusiliers have AT nade from the get go, and this doesnt make OKW suddenly OP and unstoppable by having snare early on.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 219
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
since schwere HQ is going from 60 to 90 fuel, does this not mean that obers will be coming out even later than they currently do?
think that may be a scenario that we do not want
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
since schwere HQ is going from 60 to 90 fuel, does this not mean that obers will be coming out even later than they currently do?
think that may be a scenario that we do not want
Posts: 219
Posts: 956
Posts: 857 | Subs: 2
Posts: 578
Posts: 240
The Ruleset is only a guideline, and are not actually the Rules. This is .org
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Don't give sturmpios both schrek and sweeper at the same time!
It makes the unit so versatile compared to any other engi squad in the game, plus lets teamgame players get improved repairs and schrekblob capabilities without penalty.
It's just a bad idea ok
Posts: 69
Obers were getting deleted by vet II+ LMG infantry by the time they came out in 3v3+. As a rule of thumb these days I assume that I'll be to be forced to retreat a pair 2-3 times before enough vet is attained to go toe-to-toe with a pair of vet II+ mainline lmg squads. And that's from fighting in light cover!
Granted this change might make them rather obnoxious in 1v1s but we'll see.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1289
Talking about Obers ST44 how about greatly reducing their DPS but increasing the size to 5 men? Squad with low entity number are not very good CQC units.
Posts: 956
Obers should be moved to the Command HQ and require 1 deployed truck, but the LMG34 and IR STGS would be locked behind the Schwerer Panzer HQ. This change would give OKW more options for the mid game.
), but the placement timing I've voiced against many a time (in the live version).
 |
|
|
132 | ||
 |
|
|
80 | ||
 |
|
|
122 | ||
 |
|
|
48 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
