Login

russian armor

[Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (66)down
28 Nov 2020, 09:39 AM
#102
avatar of Blebfeesh

Posts: 129

My thoughts are primarily from 3v3/4v4 AT experience. If something is not mentioned, then I think it's acceptable.

It WILL 1 shot 4 man grens at 70 range if they're in yellow green clumped, and you don't even need to switch to HE rounds. That needs to go. (Thanks SweetRollNextDoor for posting about it too. I went in and tested against green after you said it could do that and yes, it does it consistantly.)


Et tu Brute?
Nah, it is kinda dumb, albiet hysterical that it erases infantry in green cover like its nothing. Imo, it should be an activated ability that functions like the Jagdtiger's or 17 pounders ability. with its anti infantry potential nerfed so it cant just thanos snap vet 5 obers having the audacity to use green cover. Just reducing its anti infantry ability just turns it into the worst of both worlds, bad vs infantry and bad vs tanks.
28 Nov 2020, 09:47 AM
#103
avatar of Selvy289

Posts: 366

Forgot about the ISU concrete round. Iv used it many times wiping infantry in green cover, it defiantly shouldn't anymore expecially now that its more potent against tanks and cost. Its easier to use than the pershings ap round which is still bounceable and cost about the same only effective against armor (I got the price wrong its 50muni).
28 Nov 2020, 09:54 AM
#104
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1289

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 09:38 AMgbem
Wehraboos wont rest till the soviets are unplayable...


The soviets changes get the most post obviously. I do like most of them.

But the t70 triple nerf and the utter nutering of ram without any noticable buff to speak off makes the t34 76 quite usseles imo.
Both penals and cons being focused into a role of durability wont help penals. Penals need a bit more umpf in at or ai to be viable late game. Durability is tge role of cons.
28 Nov 2020, 10:49 AM
#105
avatar of luvnest
Strategist Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20

Combat Engineers



very good change!

M3 Scout



I also like this one, giving the M3 much needed utility.

Maxim



I gotta test this, but from reading the patch nodes, this should be good. I never quite understood a use case for the sustained fire ability though.

ZiS-3 Field Gun



yeah this is a good change

Special Rifle Command



good change

Penal Battalion



Hm, I appreciate the change but this doesn't change the fact that penals scale quite badly against upgraded volks or 5men Grens. Especially not for their cost of 300MP. T1 openings take quite a heavy toll on your manpower (especially since healing costs 250 MP for some reason). I'd suggest lowering the penal cost to 280 mp to better reflect their combat performance on top of the changes above. A tommy squad is at 270 and with the global 5th man upgrade I'd rather have that squad instead of a penal any time.

M5 Half-Track



Gotta see how this plays out, if it becomes too much of a dice roll to take down a plane,

SU76



my biggest issue with the Su76 is that it is extremely sluggish and unresponsive and has poor accuracy (e.g. hitting the ground multiple times) and penetration making it easy prey for PUMA or PIVs. The changes are nice, but won't change anything in that regard.

I think it's important to make Soviet T3 more worthwhile since the T70 is all that holds soviet mid game together, and that is getting nerfed now.

T70



Quite a hefty nerf for a unit that basically carries soviet mid game.

T34/76 and T34/85 Ram Ability



So what does the ram do now? just damage? Locked behind vet 1 seems like a bad choice in my opinion.

Katyusha



yeah if this is kept consistent with all other rocket arty this should be fine

SU85



I guess that's fair, it's still really good

ISU-152



alright

Summary

I can't really tell if this patch does the soviets more harm than good. T1 Changes are good over all (except penals maybe). T3 changes are not optimal. By nerfing the t70 I feel like there needs to be a compensation by making the SU76 more reliable and a good tank hunter for medium tanks (or better with vet). As a result, Soviets would be less dependent on rushing for the t70 and instead go for T1 with SU76 backup. This opens up more ways to play with them. I'd also suggest lowering the cost of base healing in at least manpower regards and/Or adding fuel or muni cost instead. Just food for thought.

We also have to see if that horrible early game around enemy osttruppen/Flame HT is gone now. A 4 Minute Flame HT for soviets is incredibly hard to deal with the core components (e.g. without baby at gun). I hope this patch will make T1 a viable strat again, bringing more variety to the games.

EDIT:

After playing the mod I can confirm that osttruppen will still dominate the soviet early game, light vehicle timing + pgrens is too powerful. Since soviets have to go for M42 at guns every game in order to deal with that, I don't see any change in the meta, regardless of the ostheer changes. T1 is not feasable, because 222 arrives at the 4/5 min mark. The Penal vs Osttruppen combat, considering it's a 100 mp difference is really weak.

Also snipers can't deal with MGs now without sacrificing a valuable supporting squad in front of it, which makes it vulnerable to flanks. I don't like the sight change at all, especially since sniper were rarely seen in the patch previously anyway.
28 Nov 2020, 10:50 AM
#106
avatar of gbem

Posts: 1979



The soviets changes get the most post obviously. I do like most of them.


Yes because the soviets are already the weakest faction in the game and this retarded patch nerfs their last few good units... the su85 t70 zis3 all got nerfs...

Might aswell remove the faction from the game at this point since the balance team is under the delusion that the soviets are a good faction... you know ignoring automatch winrates pickrates and tourney results...
28 Nov 2020, 11:02 AM
#108
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

ALSO people call ram+off map cheese but... Like how else exactly is Soviet supposed to kill an Elefant or JT since their only TDs are casemate and will flat out lose against these big beasts...


Sometimes it feels like they're not supposed to.
28 Nov 2020, 11:13 AM
#109
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 10:49 AMluvnest

my biggest issue with the Su76 is that it is extremely sluggish and unresponsive and has poor accuracy (e.g. hitting the ground multiple times) and penetration making it easy prey for PUMA or PIVs. The changes are nice, but won't change anything in that regard.


Su-76 probably feels "sluggish" because of the cone of fire that is begin fixed it mobility is inline and its rotation superior to other casemates.

I will test a bit more.

Imo making KV-8 a call in unit without requiring T4 might create more reason to use this unit.
28 Nov 2020, 11:17 AM
#110
avatar of vonAsten

Posts: 462 | Subs: 4

In my opinion ram ability needed to be nerfed. It was incredibly cheesy combined with airstrikes. there was no real counter play to that. Especially considered that a t34 only costs 90 fuel, which is too cheap imo. In lategame you can easily survive with double zis guns and a few t34. Which means you dont need much mapcontrol but still can have huge mappresence lategame.

I think double zis-guns will still be a 2-men army. They need to make them 4 men or remove the barrage ability or at least nerf it heavily (the nerf in the patch notes is not enough)

kv-1 should get a slight armour nerf.

In return Soviet early game is weak. I think one of the reasons is their Healing. It should be buffed. I feel like in the early game you cant get the map back because you lose so much time with healing. Especially vs flametruck from Ostheer they suffer becuase cons (or penals/ guards) take a lot of health damage and then spend a lot of time healing in base.

I also think cons perform slightly too bad in the early game. But buffing them could be dangerous, since they also have oorah, good sandbags, mollys, good vet 3 and atnades.
28 Nov 2020, 11:34 AM
#111
avatar of mrgame2

Posts: 1794

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 09:34 AMDharx


Sure, some more nerfs are needed for literally the worst unit in SOV roster.


Same can be said of stuff and two. At least su76 is getting a buff.

The barrage is a qol fix imo. Yes it should be reduce similarly

I could be wrong but su76 main gun has better attack infantry profile. I lost more infantry to su76 normal shots than t34s
28 Nov 2020, 11:47 AM
#112
avatar of Selvy289

Posts: 366

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 11:34 AMmrgame2


Same can be said of stuff and two. At least su76 is getting a buff.

The barrage is a qol fix imo. Yes it should be reduce similarly


Not really it more of a fix, the su76 is just getting what every other turret-less tank in the game has plus a new ability replacing the old one.

In regards to the M5, I think its abit too much. Ill try 4%.

Penals even through they come abit earlier, by mid game late game they dont fair well against upgraded infantry in damage or staying power. By late they bleed you (at penals just become dead weight).

I said in the past move some accuracy to their received accuracy, it isnt working. Honestly they are so out of place idk what changes they need.
28 Nov 2020, 12:04 PM
#113
avatar of GachiGasm

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Alternative ram change could be making it a skill shot instead of homing at least then it requires more than a pair of clicks.

Problem with this, is that its most likely will be used to wipe inf. But if it possible to lower crashing profile during the ram, then it could work.


ALSO people call ram+off map cheese but... Like how else exactly is soviet supposed to kill an elefant or JT since their only TDs are casemate and will flat out lose against these big beasts...


Well honestly you dont need ram to do the offmap, its just easier with it, you can just block them from behind and drop offmap. Thing is if there is a shreck blob running around, aswell as pak walls, then every allied faction will have problems dealing with mentioned units.
28 Nov 2020, 12:18 PM
#114
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Su-76
The reveal radius in camo seem to be very small and the unit very difficult to detect.

B4
This unit is the lest effected by the changes to Arty and it need to be looked at.

I would also suggest that direct fire mod be changed to a firing mode that turn the gun into an ATG gun with a range of 50-60.


Maxim

The sustain fire seem oppressive at start and progressively losing power.
I suggest a MU increase and discount with each vet level.
28 Nov 2020, 12:59 PM
#115
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 10:49 AMluvnest
I'd also suggest lowering the cost of base healing in at least manpower regards and/Or adding fuel or muni cost instead. Just food for thought.

In return Soviet early game is weak. I think one of the reasons is their Healing. It should be buffed.


The healing is getting a small buff with the medics QoL improvement, as the aura should help heal the large Soviet squads faster.

We are looking at decreasing the manpower cost of either the medic upgrade or T3 to give Soviet mid game teching an easier time.
28 Nov 2020, 13:04 PM
#116
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

Give Soviets unlocked molotov tech when T1 or T2 is built. Miragefla's mod had this change and it was excellent.
28 Nov 2020, 13:47 PM
#117
avatar of JibberJabberJobber

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 10:49 AMluvnest

Summary

I can't really tell if this patch does the soviets more harm than good. T1 Changes are good over all (except penals maybe). T3 changes are not optimal. By nerfing the t70 I feel like there needs to be a compensation by making the SU76 more reliable and a good tank hunter for medium tanks (or better with vet). As a result, Soviets would be less dependent on rushing for the t70 and instead go for T1 with SU76 backup. This opens up more ways to play with them. I'd also suggest lowering the cost of base healing in at least manpower regards and/Or adding fuel or muni cost instead. Just food for thought.

We also have to see if that horrible early game around enemy osttruppen/Flame HT is gone now. A 4 Minute Flame HT for soviets is incredibly hard to deal with the core components (e.g. without baby at gun). I hope this patch will make T1 a viable strat again, bringing more variety to the games.


Thank you for your thoughts, please do the same for the other factions! :D

I have the same ideas about Soviets as you, mainly the AT options of Soviet T1 (an alternative to the M-42), their very manpower intensive teching and the lack of scaling on the SU-76 and Penals. The T-70 should remain the centerpiece of Soviet build orders, but toning it down gives the opportunity to address some of these things.

What do you think of Soviet lategame, is it fine or is it too strong? If it's the latter, what would you change about it?

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 10:49 AMluvnest

EDIT:

After playing the mod I can confirm that osttruppen will still dominate the soviet early game, light vehicle timing + pgrens is too powerful. Since soviets have to go for M42 at guns every game in order to deal with that, I don't see any change in the meta, regardless of the ostheer changes. T1 is not feasable, because 222 arrives at the 4/5 min mark. The Penal vs Osttruppen combat, considering it's a 100 mp difference is really weak.


Do provide the replay(s) as well if you don't mind sharing them.

We want to keep Osttruppen builds viable, keeping it situationally strong like Assault Grenadiers, so any further nerfs shouldn't hit too hard.

How would you go about further delaying their timing? There have been different ideas floating around, so tell me which one of them you like best, if any:
  • Keep them like in the preview, but add a slight manpower cost.
  • Short recharge like live, but require T1 to unlock Faust. T2 doesn't give Faust anymore.
  • Make Osttruppen buildable in HQ, so the Ostheer player has to choose between getting an MG42 or Osttruppen squad first. 25-30 seconds buildtime.


jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2020, 10:49 AMluvnest

So what does the ram do now? just damage? Locked behind vet 1 seems like a bad choice in my opinion.


It still stuns. It will also still damage the engine if it penetrates, it's just the rare heavy engine damage (think recrewing an abandoned tank) and immobilize crits that got removed.

The reason for moving it to vet 1 is because ram becomes very hard to avoid for the opponent once there are multiple T34s on the field, especially if the opponent has a heavy tank. Right now, Soviet lategame with AT offmaps often revolves around just pumping out as many T34s as possible and waiting for the first mistake from the opponent to delete his tank, there's not much counterplay involved. At vet 1, the combo will still be as potent, but the opponent will have an easier time playing around it.

Another route would be to make ram have less impact but also have less drawbacks, so ram + offmap won't necessarily mean a dead tank for both sides. Ram would slow down the enemy tank's speed and acceleration (like ret mine) and do some damage, while it would overheat the T34's engine (like on failed ram) and disable its gun temporarily (8~ seconds). No stuns, damaged engines or immobilizations anymore.
28 Nov 2020, 14:01 PM
#118
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

Give Soviets unlocked molotov tech when T1 or T2 is built. Miragefla's mod had this change and it was excellent.


+1 It seems very strange that Molotovs still require a separate side-tech.
28 Nov 2020, 14:07 PM
#119
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

i wanna point out that ML20 howitzer still has cooldown bug (it says 0 seconds remaining and stays there for a good amount of time) - please fix it in upcoming patch..



All arty pieces that got hit with the recent cooldown nerf have this bug.
28 Nov 2020, 14:09 PM
#120
avatar of JibberJabberJobber

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3



+1 It seems very strange that Molotovs still require a separate side-tech.


Maybe not free, but cheaper, so from 80/10 to 40/10.

It's a good ability considering the vet 2 throw speed and the low 20 munition cost. If it was free as part of tech, it should be 30 munitions.
PAGES (66)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

740 users are online: 1 member and 739 guests
Rosbone
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49065
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM