Profile of astro_zombie

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 123

General Information


Thread: Faction Imbalance16 Aug 2014, 17:31 PM Don't generalize people so much. Not everyone wants some instawin thing. There is clearly something not quite right, don't you think? Or do you want this game to lose more players? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Imbalance16 Aug 2014, 17:23 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Aug 2014, 17:04 PMDarthBong420 you mean when allies lose their advantage and the game becomes equal? ffs you allied "players" don't realize that you guys the advantage all the way to mid game. the germans have are on the back foot until they get their heavies. you do not understand this. if you want to win just do it in 4 minutes when you have a huge advantage with maxims, snipers, elite rifles, power wagon. lol, why should anyone want to be forced to win a game in 4 minutes? It's an idiotic design. Not every player is soviet and many people, including myself, don't even seem to have rifle company. It's not even a guarantee. Some maps are just impossible to flank and you lose the advantage. Who would want to have to win a game in 4 minutes? Nobody would, the games last much longer than that. what you are saying proves what an awful video game design this is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Game Freeze Followed by Fast Forward16 Aug 2014, 05:42 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2014, 23:31 PMDeath's Head This is become so unbelievably frequent that I am just about fed up with this game. Balance problems... Auto-matching problems... Optimization problems... Bugs, pathing and numerous other coding problems... and now this? You have GOT to be kidding me Relic... I feel your pain man. I want to like the game but at every turn it just tries its best to make you hate it. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Game Freeze Followed by Fast Forward16 Aug 2014, 05:41 AM Relic, you cannot seriously IGNORE this problem. Do you guys understand that this game is fucked because of this? No one will take this game seriously with this crap. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: The Problem of Axis in Teamgames16 Aug 2014, 05:39 AM This has been how every team game has played out for months. Today, not kidding, 98% searching axis, and to think people say things like that number doesn't mean anything. We all know what the real reason for it is. You don't need a scientific study to see what's right in front of your face. Anyway, between the extreme lopsidedness of this and the game still constantly freezing/speeding up at the worst times, I think I've had enough. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Schwerer Panzer HQ Firing outside of its range?14 Aug 2014, 02:39 AM Does target size factor into this and other situations with MGs similar to this? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Why isn't the King Tiger doctrinal?14 Aug 2014, 02:32 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2014, 00:22 AMImagelessbean It's not a super unit, it's a break through unit. The idea is that if OKW manage to get the resources to get one the allies have a massive army and they need a damage sponge to push into the line and open it so the infantry can exploit it. I have been on the side with and against this unit and it is no more a threat than any other heavy tank. Rely on good placement of AT units and an ability or two and you will either force it off or destroy it. When forced off the entire OKW army must retire because it has no support and they literally cannot lose it (Imagine losing 400 fuel in tanks in one go, you lose the game). It is seriously no scarier than a regular Tiger. Beating it does not mean you don't lose tanks, you can lose potentially 4 or more tanks and still retain a lead while fighting it. If you are talking about it at high levels of vet that's your own fault. In team games I actually find the Jagdtiger far more intimidating. I understand what the "intent" of it is, but I disagree with your conclusion that it is no different than any other heavy. It is not a heavy - a tiger and IS2 are heavies - this and the Jagd are "super heavies." Heavies are counterable and killable within reason. Super heavies allow you to play mediocre all game and then pull something out that requires an inordinate amount of resources to counter. If you want to argue OKW needs it and that the Jagd is worse, which it probably is, it just solidifies how I feel about the concept of such units. I just lament them from a design perspective and think the game is worse due to their existence. I digress... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why isn't the King Tiger doctrinal?13 Aug 2014, 22:46 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Aug 2014, 22:15 PMNapalm I love the King Tiger. By far the best piece of armor in the game. It shouldn't be doctrinal because this game is all about super units now. More super units = super fun. Ammirite? Sad but true, except for when the faction or doctrine you pick doesn't get any. At least in command and conquer everyone got a superweapon. As I've stated before, I really think the whole superunit thing has no business in COH and makes it a worse game because of it. Hated it in COH1, wish they did away with it in COH2, but in fact just made it worse. SU players love the ISU152 - Axis players hate it. Axis players love KT/Jagd/etc - allies hate it. See a trend here? While we're at it, why don't they just give US a Nuclear Doctrine? Might as well with the absurd shit in this game at this point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Someone Can Explain prestige?12 Aug 2014, 23:48 PM number go high, then number go low In: Lobby
Thread: New commander release. 12 Aug 2014, 00:05 AM LOL, very good. In: Lobby