Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback2 Dec 2020, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 15:20 PMJibberJabberJobber I've thought about a similar approach myself and I agree it is a more wholesome solution to fix T1's AT problem. The PTRS upgrade for Penals always felt a bit shoehorned into T1. Balance wise, it would have a much greater impact than improving the PTRS upgrade on Penals. T1 would have access to more sandbags (and other utility) from the PTRS Conscripts. Penals would be able to focus fully on their AI role. Giving AT satchels to all Penals would also be a big (maybe unnecessary) change. T1 would be played very differently from now. It's an interesting idea that would definitely be worth testing, but it would require further finetuning like Vipper said. It leaves Tank Hunters PTRS upgrade in question. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback2 Dec 2020, 11:30 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 11:02 AMVipper Now try to kill a zis with Elefant and Pak with ISU. Try using 2 M36 with AP around vs Elefant and see what happens, hell try using 3 Su-76 vs Elefant and see what happens. And now you try something that is actually realistic and put 2 PaKs near that elefant. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Excessive Amount Of Micro Required For Brummbar1 Dec 2020, 23:39 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 22:03 PMVipper it should also fix this inconstancy in projectile speed. It would be consistent to greatly decrease the AoE, AoE profile, increase scatter then and decrease penetration by 75%. It would also be consistent to put it behind a doctrine, because both vehicles that you want to put it in line with are doctrinal, it is very inconsistent for brummbar not to be. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 20:16 PMWiderstreit and why it should be better than other AA? Amount of units capable of shooting down planes for Ost: 5. Amount of units capable of shooting down planes for OKW: 4. Amount of units capable of shooting down planes for USF: 3(not sure if M20 does, 2 if it can't). Amount of units capable of shooting down planes for UKF: 2. Amount of units capable of shooting down planes for Sov: 1. 222 is extremely reliable AA unit too for whatever reason. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Excessive Amount Of Micro Required For Brummbar1 Dec 2020, 13:00 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 12:34 PMVipper Brumabr barrage should have Cd lowered now that it has a cost and projectile speed increased. The other changes can applied if there is need for it. You are not contradicting yourself, wanting other ammo based barrages to get higher cooldown, ignoring attached muni cost. And there is zero reason why projectile speed should be increased, its one of the reasons why zis just got its barrage nerfed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] USF Feedback1 Dec 2020, 12:31 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 12:20 PMTickTack Is the greyhound being considered for any changes? I've noticed it's really good against OKW's Luchs, is it intended to counter light vehicles or early infantry? It's great against both. What about a little armour nerf? So small arms (and luchs) do a bit more damage to it. It can deal some damage to it. Its not good against it in any way. Both are AI specialist vehicles of similar price, its only natural they will put some kind of fight against each other. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback1 Dec 2020, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2020, 12:04 PMWiderstreit For what do you need more AA as Allii? Germans air-attacks arn't that powerful and are still easy to counter. I'll just assume you don't even know SCAS exists. Kind of understandable as its not with AG, VSL or osttruppen doctrine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback30 Nov 2020, 20:56 PM Can we finally stop this clownery with pretending that penals have anything to do with elite infantry? The only thing they have to do with elite infantry is from back in the day, where picking a doctrine with guards or shocks REPLACED penals with them in T1. Being better then cons doesn't exactly warrant elite status as that bar is placed rather low and cons are much more cost efficient then penals anyway, especially in late game. We know that certain someone around here is absolutely batshit terrified of the possibility that penals might get a well deserved buff, but lets not pull random semantical terms out of arse to "prove" that penals do not need the buffs for both, late game scaling and AT late game scaling. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 rework30 Nov 2020, 20:33 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 15:21 PMVipper Tank slugging it out stationary does not say much for their balance. Most tank fight involve moving and trying to flank slower vehicles with faster vehicles. Same applies to infantry, but that doesn't stop you from doing it all the time and bringing it up endlessly. Again, the ONLY thing that T34 needs it NOT BEING IMMOBILIZED after ram. Make it exact same 5 second stun on T34 and gun destroyed crit, contrary to popular belief, Hitlerium wasn't used all that often in german tanks and both were equally badly damaged after a ram, no reason why one should end as a scrap, while other just got a dent in bumper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback30 Nov 2020, 20:12 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 15:57 PMJibberJabberJobber I'll put on some weight and try T1 again. Turns out Doritos and Mountain Dew was his secret all along! And whoever thinks PTRS deals any kind of noticeable damage to front armor of any vehicle armored better then an ostwind is a clown completely detached from any kind of reality. In: COH2 Balance