Profile of Katitof

If you read through the tread you will notice that the discussion focuses on the said problematic in a 2v2 context.

In this case its even easier, because you can coordinate with your team mate to push sov off it(use MG42 to pin) and just walk up to it with flame pio and torch it.

That's all dandy and fine on paper, but on some maps (Semois, Kharkov) you can't really go someplace else, since the FHQ will be ideally located to cut you off or to force you into an engagement.

Regular mortars just don't deal enough dps in order to take out a fhq defended by a soviet mortar so if you don't get the MHT you're gonna be outgunned and will loose so much map control that the FHQ will have paid off, even if you manage to avoid manpower loses.

Umm, if soviet goes for early FHQ, there will be no conscrits around the map and no early T2 mortars to defend it.

If soviet goes for T2, there won't be any early FHQ locking the map up until 2 CPs.

If he places FHQ near your cutoff, get around the map and cut off his resources while locking them with MG42 and/or mine field.

FHQ is incredibly easy to counter if you know what to do, it forces soviet player to keep most of his forces near it to defend it, it DECREASES his field presence across the map, allowing you for more room around it.

The only reason why people are having problems with FHQ is it is so damn rare sight that people have no slightest clue on how to react to it.

I would love to see those orginanised plans for mass extermination that you people claim german SS commanders had and did. Yeah i seen the documantaries too but i have never seen hard evidence of orders of mass extermination like you guys claim. Remember allies had broken the german enigma code so if extermination on that scale really happened why are we never presented with an intercepted transmission?

Then you're welcome to take a tour to poland, to german concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkenau in Oświecim and see it for yourself. Maybe seeing the gas chambers, crematoria and products made out of humans will beat some sense into your head.

I'm usually smart enough to not get into this kind of discussions, but statements like yours makes me want to kick you so hard in the ass that you will know how my shoe taste like.

These players represent the best players of coh 2 and win because they have far superior skills then the average newbie maxim spammer. That doesn't mean the maxim is not op dumbass.

If you want to discredit everything that is thrown your way, you might just as well quit the discussion, because you don't give a shit about how to counter maxims and only thing you care for it nerfing them so you can grenspam with impunity or no adaptation.

If you see a better then you player countering something, you don't go screaming "OMG HE GUT AND I R BAD, HE GOD OF MICRO, I CAN NOT KNOW DIFFERENCE BETWUN PIO AND GREN", you watch fucking better players and LEARN from them. This is the exact reason why I have relatively small number of games played, but I'm way better then VAST majority of players who have 1000s games with CoH2.

You are as good as you let yourself be. If you're not willing on improving yourself, don't blame balance, because its not balance thats bad here-its you and only you are to blame.

This applies in general to about 95% of posters on this and official forums.
Most of balance threads could be replaced with "Why the fuck would I have to use anything else then grens and tigers?" and it wouldn't change a thing about whats inside them.

No decent German player would allow his sc to get at naded. of course they do more damage up close but conscripts fail hard to take out a sc from cover and at range. maxims with at support like guards or zis have a far better time at it.

There are no cons in maxim spam. There is a high chance that there are no guards with T2 build as well.
Unless sov gets 2 ZiS guns to face the same direction, your SC should not die to anything, but will be able to distract maxims for repositioning/retreats and even retreat kills, which it does excellent this patch.

I'd like to know if there's any movies about the Eastern Front that aren't 30 years old / low budget / propaganda foil.

Other then documentaries? Nope.