Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback23 Dec 2020, 21:48 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 21:46 PMVipper Still waiting for any test done by you that backs your claim that "are very bad in actual combat". Until then pls stop quoting me. I just did and posted the results. It shows that pioneers perform much better then upgraded REs as you can see if you compare our screenshots. Clearly pios have much higher efficiency, you can't ignore that, its stat from in-game that YOU yourself brought up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback23 Dec 2020, 21:34 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 21:16 PMVipper once more you are projecting (because you are an April fools joke) Ok then. Lets focus on real balance problem then. Clarly from my stats compared to your stats we can see that pios are 350% more overpowered then REs and they require much lower investment of only 60 muni per squad as opposed to bolster+anvil+90for brens+70 or however much it costs now for heavy sappers. Do you see how bullshit that post of yours is or should we continue your clown performance? @mods if you don't think of posting post game stats to argument anything as an utter joke as well then this site is completely hopeless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback23 Dec 2020, 21:14 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 21:10 PMVipper Here is a little and game stat from a preview game. https://www.coh2.org/file/19332/heavy-sapper1.jpg https://www.coh2.org/file/19331/heavy-sapper-2.jpg 19 kill and 652% efficiency Now feel free to install the game, use the RO.E and prove that "are very bad in actual combat" as you claim. Is this some kind of early April fools joke? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback23 Dec 2020, 20:23 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 20:20 PMAlphrum but there not, so your argument crumbles. just because grens are not being changed too much, doesn't mean there fine, the balance team is making small changes and being cautious which is the right thing to do. They are considered fine by balance team. While I not always agree with them, I'd take their word for it over someone who thinks ost can be played like USF against USF. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My perspective on the upcoming changes as a UKF main23 Dec 2020, 20:17 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 16:04 PMVipper You are assuming that UKF cap slower in preview when they can actually cap faster by producing a Ro.E. You honestly believe current live 4 sections with 1.25 cap speed cap slower then preview version bo with 3 1.0 cap speed rifles and 1 combat ineffective RE with 1.25? Like... really? Based on... what exactly, because most certainly not on stats or reality. Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 20:06 PMNorthFireZ snip Was it tested against an actual player or easy AI? Because players will contest you and that RE isn't going to hold any territory and neither will the outnumbered by that point sections. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback23 Dec 2020, 20:14 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 13:58 PMVipper The moving speed penalty is enough to keep the unit from fighting effectively. They were spammed and used with tripple lmg in active combat despite that. Do you know why they are not anymore? Because once LMGs were nerfed and their original durability was nerfed and their original vet was nerfed, they because completely irrelevant as anything else but a repair bot. If they are going to see any kind of active combat use, then that's amazing, a dead unit brought to life, don't need to shit your pants in fear over that. I am not mixing anything up and I have not claim the the upgrade is "broken", that simply katitof. This is my original post which I think you agree: Literally every single person on this forum knows that "looked at" in your dictionary means "nerf hard". You're not fooling anyone. And if that's what you somehow actually meant, then we've looked at it. Its fine. Now we've looked at it, we can finally move on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback23 Dec 2020, 20:10 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 15:35 PMGachiGasm This is common misrepresentation, that if something is used 99% of the time its automatically OP. WC was OP objectively. VSL was OP objectively. Osttroopens used not because they are OP, but because they are better then grens. If 200mp unit is better then 240mp unit, when latter is considered fine(the fact that the only change grens got was formation is testament to their own balance), then that is dictionary definition of OP unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback23 Dec 2020, 13:27 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 13:25 PMVipper You mean in live or a preview game? Comparing to commandos an elite doctrinal unit makes little sense, compare them with other engineer types units and you might be surprised. It might be a massive shock to you, but pioneers or CEs do not have access to late game upgrades, nor you can dump 150+ muni on them to make them better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback23 Dec 2020, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 13:16 PMVipper LMG grenadier are not a good benchmark either since the are meant to excel at long cover to cover fights and the punch above their cost in that particular scenario. MR conscripts can simply ourah to them and beat them. 6 man cons can do the same. If you can't inflict enough damage to approaching inf, you aren't going to win CQC engagement with LMGs squipped. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback23 Dec 2020, 12:30 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2020, 12:29 PMVipper And now that it has been introduced, and after several other buff conscripts have received over the years their superior vet bonuses where toned down. And now we can buff SVT, PPSH and 7th man separately if the need shows up! In: COH2 Balance