Profile of JHeartless

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1637

General Information
Steam: 76561198006521729


Thread: retreat modifiers15 May 2014, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2014, 14:22 PMKatitof ] Except, there is nothing wrong with it. If you overextend your infantry, you will loose it. Retreat was never supposed to be free "out of fail" card where angels descend upon your troops and with that divine intervention allow them to come out unharmed from the avalanche of bullets and flames. Retreat makes your squads harder to kill for small arms and thats about it. If you've lost squad to anything else on retreat, it means you overextended or were successfully flanked. ROFLMAO But I want my Angels! If you did this OP the counter to the effectivness of the KV8 would be simply hitting the retreat button. Then this expensive call in would be useless really. Unless of course they countered it by BUFFING the flame damage to insta whipe levels like it was in the past and I dont think ANYONE wants that. Like SURPRISE KV8 entire army gone In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T315 May 2014, 14:04 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2014, 13:40 PMcoh2player KV-1 is good for its cost (around the same as a T-34/85) and should be employed with different strats. Unlike the soviet mediums, ts armor/HP renders German T3 moot. It has the same gun as the T-34/76. I find that it has staying power, and works well with a zis in support. It arrives early and can be deployed far forward due to its armor so a continuous front line can be maintained. It's a meatshield. It is vulnerable to paks and heavies, but what isn't? With its recent changes it is also alot more vulnerable to Fausts. I used to enjoy the fact that it could bonunce fausts and had enough HPs to make it worth its cost. But I can routinely beat them with P4s just keep the P4 at range where the Pen drop off for the T34/76 gun cant compete. And unlike the T34 post patch it CANNOT close the distance or easily escape. Want to see comedy watch a blob of KV1s vs a single Pak 43. Point the gun away wait for the pack to get in mid range then point at them and watch them die one by one trying in vain to escape. I absolutely hate this tank this patch. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T315 May 2014, 13:25 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2014, 08:09 AMKreatiir You trollin' brah? I really think this is just a bad tank wrapped in some armor.. I think it's one of the worst tanks to call-in, but of course I might be wrong. Poor Speed, Mediocre Armor, Poor AT, Mediocre AI, High Relative Cost....Pak Bait. When paired with an SU85 its "Better than nothing" but I would take a Sherman or T34/85 call in any damn day over this POS. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poor MG42 vs Rich MaxPin!15 May 2014, 13:16 PM MG42s suppression is not a problem. It is easily suited as a defensive weapon but it should be used offensively. Soviets need x2 the number of Maxims to MG42s to duplicate the effectiveness of an MG42 in the rear of an attack force. I prefer the MG42 in all cases every time. The Maxim may be able to go in unsupported in certain cases (until its Rnade to death) but the MG42 is VERY efficient at blob control. I call this balanced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: You cant better your gameplay? No worries, just drophack!14 May 2014, 21:43 PM I had one drop hacker pre battle servers. None since He had a program that would prevent the replay from being recorded and would quit at loss without a loss. Happened to me twice. He was from the land of China. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T314 May 2014, 19:54 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 17:47 PMMitylite From the beginning of my playtime, I've always tried Tier 3 soviet and it always wrinkles my sprinkles. T34 is arse when you aren't already ahead of the German Tier 3. It feels like a landslide dependent tier. If you aren't riding the landslide it will suck butts, if you are riding the landslide, it will too and seem "ok". German Tier 3 is great. It does everything so well that I don't NEED tier 4. Stugs in particular are being awesome because so many seem to go T3 this patch with soviets... Stugs eat that up in my experience with them. This. I dont bother with a T34 though. T70 is the landslide tank of choice for me. KILL THAT INFANTRY and get your stupidly fast veterancy so you can push them Nazis back into their spider holes! But if your dragged out your hosed. Tiger is GG for Zis even a pair of them. And they seem to have an Anti AT Nade coating (Patent Pending. Until I use them of course then every AT nade is a crit... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Maps, which one you like and why?13 May 2014, 21:13 PM Hate Maps with Snow and Stalingrad Like Maps without snow In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T313 May 2014, 21:04 PM But then you get NO KAT! And they are OP! MVGame. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: soviet zis3 and su7612 May 2014, 20:33 PM I would LOVE to give up Barrage for more AT personally. Barrage is not worth it imho. If i want indirect fire I can build a Mortar... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Penals and Veterancy11 May 2014, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post10 May 2014, 18:31 PMelchino7 Remember that it´s damage > kills. Maybe some other units got the most hits rather than the Penals just killstealing True which is why I am hoping someone can look at the game files. It may just be my imagination. In: COH2 Gameplay