Profile of JHeartless

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1637

General Information
Steam: 76561198006521729


Thread: Tournament28 Apr 2014, 21:17 PM Count me as Intermediate. Lets do this. In: Events Central
Thread: Blitzkrieg is pretty useless now28 Apr 2014, 21:13 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 21:07 PMvan Voort Is it better than smoke? I tend to think no Darn it. Your right! And while we are at it. Tripwire flair isnt better than Incendiary strike I mean WTF. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: soviet mines - squad wipes28 Apr 2014, 16:33 PM Yeah I did to. Was wondering if it was dumb luck though. Something may be amiss. I also had a single cluster of Smines kill a full health M3. So something is odd about mines in general I think. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther is under-performing for its cost28 Apr 2014, 16:13 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 16:03 PMIpKaiFung it's already got 50 range, which is very high for a turreted vehicle, and it's also very fast. however it's penetration values on the main gun somehow are 180/170/160 when it should be 260/240/220 I think the fuel cost increase was too much. The HP and Armor changes makes it no longer practically invincible. 160 damage a shot from a Zis with its craptasic reload 960 HPs was a bit much. Its also not the only tank to lose HPs this patch. I personally think that the T4 tech price in general should come down. T3 for cheaper tanks that are weaker. T4 for stronger tanks that are more expensive is what I would like to see. (with the same relative cost) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PGrens post 4/24 patch28 Apr 2014, 15:25 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 14:45 PMZombiFrancis How does one stay in mid range when opposing units receive the greatest chances of winning by closing that distance or by staying at range? How does one get into mid range without sustaining (considerable) fire in transit? The only mid range that feasibly exists is the distance a squad takes to go from long to close range. And that is what pgrens are good at: firing on the move and closing the distance. Now, they're worse off before and after they close that distance, so if just the initial push isn't enough, then it really won't be enough. Let see. LMG Gren behind Pgren. Come at me Bro. They arent supposed to be run and gun against Soviet infantry in cover rambos. Not even Shock Troops can pull that off anymore. Thats like saying LMG Grens are owning my Shocks on the charge they is broken! Or you could put them in an M3 MVGame In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point28 Apr 2014, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 13:29 PM__deleted__ When speaking about shermans, I hate it and love it in the same time. Hate it while playing germans, love it when playing soviets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point28 Apr 2014, 04:29 AM I was comparing it to a T34/76. I thought you would pick up on that. And actually with the range of the SU76 it actually does better. We can do combined arms all day. I could say the same about how a Single Faust hit will equalize the Puma with the T34 and allow the Puma to take it head on. Puma spam is becoming a thing. And there is a reason. Its a no tech early call in unit. That can be countered by late tier soviet call in units effectively. It cannot be countered by a T34/76 including tech costs effectively. It invalidates T3. Just like the last meta. There is no point in building T3 if there are Pumas around. The tech cost plus the unit cost makes it not worth it. Assuming equal map control. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point28 Apr 2014, 03:01 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 02:31 AMQubix Let's compare puma to t34/76 Puma costs 280 MP 80Fuel (?) T34 310 MP 100 Fuel so the difference is not that big. T34 +wins in 1v1 +way better vs inf +ram +quicker turret turning speed Puma +more range +speed (I think it's significantly faster right?) +TWP at vet 1 and it's not that easy to get them to vet 1 since they die pretty quickly +no tech needed T34 is better at everything the only advantage of the puma is that it's easier to position it correctly due to speed and range and it only costs slightly less MP and fuel. I don't see a balance problem. At 9 cp you would be correct. Make it cheaper and weaker. It invalidates T3 soviet because it can be no tech and comes early. You will several by the time the first 76 hits the field. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 00:39 AM I think One Shot whipes are crap. Total crap. From any unit. Any Faction. No matter what it costs. Increase the Scatter and increase the ROF for the ISU. Problem solved. No potency lost for the most expensive unit in game and no more squad whipes. It should kill a full health squad faster than any piece of armor. So do whatever it takes to get that right. (more scatter less damage per shot double ROF for example) Elephant is another topic. I havent faced one this patch so I cant comment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point27 Apr 2014, 22:36 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2014, 22:20 PMAerohank I don't like Pumas. Not because of balance reasons, but because of how the unit functions. It's an armored car with a light AT gun on top. But it costs and functions as a tank with a normal AT gun on top. Its looks are very deceiving. I would prefer the Puma to be cheaper. But at the same time I want it to be slightly more vulnerable and have lower penetration. I envision this unit as a fast, cheap, tank hunter for flanking purposes. Not as a tank destroyer that can take on medium/heavy tanks from the front. +1 its very annoying. It puts T3 Soviet back to where it was pre balance changes. Puma just wrecks everything in that tier pretty easily. Its a medium tank more or less. A weak medium tank but not an armored car. In: COH2 Balance