Hedgerow chopper upgrade for the Shermans
Maybe after Vet 1, but this isn't a bad suggestion. I approve, USF lacks vehicles capable of plowing through hedgerows / heavy crush. I think currently only the Bulldozer is capable. |
Target Weak Point could just be given a 5 second cooldown so that while it can stun, it cannot take advantage of the stun personally. |
Umm, this is the battle of Crete which the Germans won, yes?
They won, but it wasn't a battle worth winning. They took far more losses than necessary due to a significant number of their men being unable to reach their weapons. Crete is the reason Hitler ordered them to never do that again, and considered large-scale airborne assaults to be tactically unsound. |
Man, shrecks will miss machine gun bunkers, still vehicles, and fuel caches unless you are within 10-15 range as well. Don't think its only a bazooka thing. Its actually a good thing that these weapons are mildly inaccurate. Bazooka can get buffs, accuracy, should not be one of them.
Bazooka is actually the least accurate RPG though, the Panzergrenadier Panzerschreck is the most accurate handheld AT weapon. The Bazooka should at least be on-par with that due to its much weaker rocket. |
Only what has been officially revealed. |
I never understood why people think the B4 is so great. It does high damage in a large radius. BUT you have no control over where the shell will land, so it's entirely up to the RNG Gods to decide if it will work. |
Giving USF a best in class light tank call in would break the game. You would pick that commander everygame, go T1, and push the enemy off of the map.
Have you missed the announcement of the Valentine? A Light Tank marginally more expensive than an M5 Stuart, but with a 75mm gun and IR Half-Track spotting? |
The quad is still a problem, it was rebalanced for the old faction. Just revert those changes and tweak the 222 some more and we'll be golden. |
I never said it loses the MG-34. I'm saying that it performs worse against infantry with the 2CM upgrade coming as stock.
Prior to this alteration I used to use my 221 with the MG-34 + Vet3 to eliminate snipers and infantry until I saw enemy light vehicles that I'd need the 2cm for. It was very effective.
I don't get it, you just admit the MG 34 stays equipped, but still argue it has less performance? |
It still had a significant engagement range advantage. Yet it gets outranged by SU-85s in this game. So that evens out. Also if we go down that lane, the T-34 shouldn´t be able to hit reliably and have poor vision range etc. The T-34 lacked in any regard but numbers and mobility.
SU-85 has range because it's a turretless Tank Destroyer and in CoH those have extra range to make up for not having turrets. I also underlined the sentence that is already a feature of the T-34/76
Also: Why does the 1941 KV deflect Panther shells? This Russian tank is totally exaggerated.
Because the KV-1 has inflated armour stats just like the Tiger I does.
The Tiger has a shit survivability in this game, since they took any survivability buff from its vet.
300 Armour and 1040 Health is not "shit survivability". |